Regulated Non-Quarantine Projects

Two EU funded projects for the benefit of the whole EPPO region

Legend
Justification for qualification based on EPPO PM 4 Standards
Justification for disqualification
Additional or non-conclusive information
Standard text



NAME OF THE ORGANISM: Verticillium dahliae (VERTDA)


GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE PEST

Name as submitted in the project specification (if different):
 

Pest category:
 
Fungi


1- Identity of the pest/Level of taxonomic listing:

Is the organism clearly a single taxonomic entity and can it be adequately distinguished from other entities of the same rank?
 
Yes

Is the pest defined at the species level or lower?:
 
Yes

Can listing of the pest at a taxonomic level higher than species be supported by scientific reasons or can species be identified within the taxonomic rank which are the (main) pests of concern?
 
  • Not relevant: Fruits (including hops) sector
If necessary, please list the species:
 
-

Is it justified that the pest is listed at a taxonomic rank below species level?
 
Not relevant

Conclusion:
 
  • Candidate: Fruits (including hops) sector
Justification (if necessary):
 
-

2 – Status in the EU:
 
Is this pest already a quarantine pest for the whole EU?
 
No

Presence in the EU:
 
Yes

List of countries (EPPO Global Database):
 
Austria (2014); Belgium (2015); Bulgaria (1986); Croatia (2016); Cyprus (2011); Czech Republic (2011); Denmark (1986); France (1986); Germany (2012); Greece (2013); Greece/Kriti (2013); Hungary (1986); Italy (2007); Malta (2007); Netherlands (2018); Portugal (1986); Slovakia (2012); Slovenia (2017); Spain (2021)

Conclusion:
 

Justification (if necessary):
 
Data of the presence of this pest on the EU territory are available in EPPO Global Database (https://gd.eppo.int/). V. dahliae is present in most EU Member States (MSs), with the exception of Ireland (absent, no pest records) and Poland (absent/uncertain). The current status of V. dahliae in the MSs where the pathogen is known to occur ranges from “restricted distribution” to “widespread” (EFSA, 2014).

HOST PLANT N°1: Corylus avellana (CYLAV) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Remark: Inspection for 'Verticillium spp.' is recommended in EPPO Standard PM 4-31 Certification scheme for hazelnut. Any plant found to be infected should be recorded and immediately removed.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
?
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate by default

 
Justification:
 
Verticillium dahliae is a soil-borne fungus that causes Verticillium wilt diseases in an extremely wide host range of annual and perennial dicotyledonous plant. Its primary economic hosts include: artichoke, aubergine, bell pepper, cotton, hop, lettuce, mints (Mentha spp.), oilseed rape, olive, potato, strawberry and tomato (CABI, 2021) and Corylus (Houshyarfard, 2020); citrus and pome fruits, however, are the exception (Smith et al. 1988).
Verticillium dahliae can survive for 14 years in soil as microsclerotia (form of resting spores) (Wilhelm, 1955), either free or embedded in plant debris, which are stimulated to germinate in response to root exudates (Mol, 1995). Infection of plants, both individuals and populations, is directly related to the inoculum density of microsclerotia in the soil (Pullman & DeVay, 1982; Harris et al., 1996; Mol et al., 1996; Xiao & Subbarao, 1998).
Verticillium dahliae is seed transmitted (CABI, 2021)
Verticillium dahliae can easily be dispersed by propagation material (nursery stock) of both herbaceous and woody hosts (e.g. Keykhasaber et al., 2018).
[In the responses to the questionnaire, SI supported deregulation in the EU because infections of Corylus avellana are relatively rare.]

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Disease symptoms may comprise wilting, chlorosis, stunting, necrosis and vein clearing. Brown vascular discoloration may be observed in stem tissue cross-sections (Frandin & Thomma, 2006). Symptoms of Verticillium wilt diseases can vary between hosts; thus, there are no unique symptoms that develop on all plants infected by V. dahliae (Fradin & Thomma, 2006). Moreover, symptoms can vary depending upon strains (pathotypes) of the pathogen (Korolev et al., 2008; Jiménez-Díaz et al., 2012; cited in EFSA, 2014).
Verticillium wilt of hazelnut trees is caused by the fungus of Verticillium dahliae, which is usually observed in early summer as a progressive loss of leaves from the infected limbs, starting at the base of each branch. Occasionally, leaves may show a true wilt and when death of these leaves is very rapid, they may remain attached to the tree for several weeks. An entire tree may show Verticillium wilt symptoms, or infection may be confined to one side, or even one branch of the hazelnut tree. Verticillium dahliae was one of the fungi involved in hazelnut decline (Houshyarfard, 2020).
[In the responses to the questionnaire, SI supported deregulation in the EU because infections of Corylus avellana are relatively rare.]

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Minor

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
Yes

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

Justification:
 

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Healthy propagation material
Healthy soil (free from Verticillium dahliae microsclerotia)
Healthy seed

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate by default

Justification:
 
Uncertainty whether plants for planting is a significant pathway compared to infection from soil.

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: economic impact considered acceptable.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2020) Verticillium dahliae (verticillium wilt), CABI Digital Library (Accessed 30/May/2024).
  • EFSA (2014) Scientific opinion on the pest categorisation of Verticillium dahliae Kleb.1. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH). EFSA Journal 12(12), 3928, 54 pp.
  • Fradin EF & Thomma BP (2006). Physiology and molecular aspects of Verticillium wilt diseases caused by V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum. Molecular Plant Pathology 7(2), 71-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00323.x.
  • Harris DC & Yang JR (1996). The relationship between the amount of Verticillium dahliae in soil and the incidence of strawberry wilt as a basis for disease risk prediction. Plant Pathology 45(1), 106-114.
  • Houshyarfard M (2020) Survey on etiology and distribution of dieback / decline of hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.) in Northern Iran. Journal of Nuts 11(3), 245-256.
  • Jiménez-Díaz RM, Cirulli M, Bubici G, Jiménez-Gasco MM, Antoniou PP & Tjamos EC (2012). Verticillium wilt: a major threat to olive production. Current status and future prospects for its management. Plant Disease 96, 304–329.
  • Keykhasaber M., Thomma BPHJ & Hiemstra JA (2018) Verticillium wilt caused by Verticillium dahliae in woody plants with emphasis on olive and shade trees. European Journal of Plant Pathology 150, 21-37.
  • Korolev N, Pérez-Artés E, Mercado-Blanco J, Bejarano-Alcázar J, Rodríguez-Jurado D, Jiménez-Díaz RM &, Katan T & Katan J (2008) Vegetative compatibility of cotton-defoliating Verticillium dahliae in Israel and its pathogenicity to various crop plants. European Journal of Plant Pathology 122, 603–617. DOI 10.1007/s10658-008-9330-1
  • Mol L, Halteren JM van, Scholte K & Struik PC (1996). Effects of crop species, crop cultivars and isolates of Verticillium dahliae on the population of microsclerotia in the soil, and consequences for crop yield. Plant Pathology 45(2), 205-214.
  • Pullman GS & DeVay JE (1982). Epidemiology of Verticillium wilt of cotton: a relationship between inoculum density and disease progression. Phytopathology 72(5), 549-554.
  • Smith IM, Dunez J, Phillips DH, Lelliot RA & Archer SA (eds) (1988) European handbook of diseases: Verticillium dahlia Kleb. and Verticillium albo-atrum Reinke & Berthold. Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford, UK. 299-302.
  • Wilhelm S (1955) Longevity of Verticillium wilt fungus in the laboratory and the field. Phytopathology 45, 180-181.
  • Xiao CL & Subbarao KV (1998). Relationships between Verticillium dahliae inoculum density and wilt incidence, severity, and growth of cauliflower. Phytopathology 88(10), 1108-1115

HOST PLANT N°2: Cydonia oblonga (CYDOB) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Remark: Inspection for ' Verticillium spp.' recommended in EPPO Standard PM 4-27 Pathogen-tested material of Malus, Pyrus and Cydonia.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
?
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate by default

 
Justification:
 
Verticillium dahliae is a soil-borne fungus that causes Verticillium wilt diseases in an extremely wide host range of annual and perennial dicotyledonous plant. Its primary economic hosts include: artichoke, aubergine, bell pepper, cotton, hop, lettuce, mints (Mentha spp.), oilseed rape, olive, potato, strawberry and tomato (CABI, 2021); citrus and pome fruits, however, are the exception (Smith et al. 1988).
Verticillium dahliae can survive for 14 years in soil as microsclerotia (form of resting spores) (Wilhelm, 1955), either free or embedded in plant debris, which are stimulated to germinate in response to root exudates (Mol, 1995). Infection of plants, both individuals and populations, is directly related to the inoculum density of microsclerotia in the soil (Pullman & DeVay, 1982; Harris et al., 1996; Mol et al., 1996; Xiao & Subbarao, 1998).
Verticillium dahliae is seed transmitted (CABI, 2021)
Verticillium dahliae can easily be dispersed by propagation material (nursery stock) of both herbaceous and woody hosts (e.g. Keykhasaber et al., 2018).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
No

Justification:
 
Disease symptoms may comprise wilting, chlorosis, stunting, necrosis and vein clearing. Brown vascular discoloration may be observed in stem tissue cross-sections (Frandin & Thomma, 2006). Symptoms of Verticillium wilt diseases can vary between hosts; thus, there are no unique symptoms that develop on all plants infected by V. dahliae (Fradin & Thomma, 2006). Moreover, symptoms can vary depending upon strains (pathotypes) of the pathogen (Korolev et al., 2008; Jiménez-Díaz et al., 2012; cited in EFSA, 2014).
For pome fruits: diseases caused by Verticillium spp. are not mentioned in the crop compendium for disease in pome fruits of the American Phytopathological Society (Sutton et al., 2014), also Smith et al (1988) indicate that pome fruits seem to be the exception to susceptibility for Verticillium spp.

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 
No

Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

Justification:
 
Remark: no reason to consider possible unacceptable economic impact to other hosts with this species more than with another species which is not regulated at present.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: no report of economic impact on this host.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2020) Verticillium dahliae (verticillium wilt), CABI Digital Library (Accessed 30/May/2024).
  • EFSA (2014) Scientific opinion on the pest categorisation of Verticillium dahliae Kleb.1. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH). EFSA Journal 12(12), 3928, 54 pp.
  • Fradin EF & Thomma BP (2006). Physiology and molecular aspects of Verticillium wilt diseases caused by V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum. Molecular Plant Pathology 7(2), 71-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00323.x.
  • Harris DC & Yang JR (1996). The relationship between the amount of Verticillium dahliae in soil and the incidence of strawberry wilt as a basis for disease risk prediction. Plant Pathology 45(1), 106-114.
  • Jiménez-Díaz RM, Cirulli M, Bubici G, Jiménez-Gasco MM, Antoniou PP & Tjamos EC (2012). Verticillium wilt: a major threat to olive production. Current status and future prospects for its management. Plant Disease 96, 304–329.
  • Keykhasaber M., Thomma BPHJ & Hiemstra JA (2018) Verticillium wilt caused by Verticillium dahliae in woody plants with emphasis on olive and shade trees. European Journal of Plant Pathology 150, 21-37.
  • Korolev N, Pérez-Artés E, Mercado-Blanco J, Bejarano-Alcázar J, Rodríguez-Jurado D, Jiménez-Díaz RM &, Katan T & Katan J (2008) Vegetative compatibility of cotton-defoliating Verticillium dahliae in Israel and its pathogenicity to various crop plants. European Journal of Plant Pathology 122, 603–617. DOI 10.1007/s10658-008-9330-1
  • Mol L, Halteren JM van, Scholte K & Struik PC (1996). Effects of crop species, crop cultivars and isolates of Verticillium dahliae on the population of microsclerotia in the soil, and consequences for crop yield. Plant Pathology 45(2), 205-214.
  • Pullman GS & DeVay JE (1982). Epidemiology of Verticillium wilt of cotton: a relationship between inoculum density and disease progression. Phytopathology 72(5), 549-554.
  • Smith IM, Dunez J, Phillips DH, Lelliot RA & Archer SA (eds) (1988) European handbook of diseases: Verticillium dahlia Kleb. and Verticillium albo-atrum Reinke & Berthold. Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford, UK. 299-302.
  • Sutton TB, Aldwinckle HS, Agnello AM & Walgenbach JF (2014). Compendium of Apple and Pear Diseases and Pests 2nd edition. American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, MN, USA
  • Wilhelm S (1955) Longevity of Verticillium wilt fungus in the laboratory and the field. Phytopathology 45, 180-181.
  • Xiao CL & Subbarao KV (1998). Relationships between Verticillium dahliae inoculum density and wilt incidence, severity, and growth of cauliflower. Phytopathology 88(10), 1108-1115.

HOST PLANT N°3: Fragaria (1FRAG) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Qualified

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
EPPO Standard PM 4/11 Certification scheme for strawberry recommends inspection for 'Verticillium dahliae & V. albo-atrum', with 0% tolerance in inspection for all production stages, except for certified material (2%).

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
 
Conclusion:
 

 
Justification:
 
Verticillium dahlia is a soil-borne fungus that causes Verticillium wilt diseases in an extremely wide host range of annual and perennial dicotyledonous plant. Its primary economic hosts include: artichoke, aubergine, bell pepper, cotton, hop, lettuce, mints (Mentha spp.), oilseed rape, olive, potato, tomato (CAB 2021) and strawberry (Harris & Yang, 1996) ; citrus and pome fruits, however, are the exception (Smith et al. 1988).
Verticillium dahliae can survive for 14 years in soil as microsclerotia (form of resting spores) (Wilhelm, 1955), either free or embedded in plant debris, which are stimulated to germinate in response to root exudates (Mol, 1995). Infection of plants, both individuals and populations, is directly related to the inoculum density of microsclerotia in the soil (Pullman & DeVay, 1982; Harris & Yang, 1996; Mol et al., 1996; Xiao & Subbarao, 1998).
Verticillium dahliae is seed transmitted (CABI, 2021)
Verticillium dahliae can easily be dispersed by propagation material (nursery stock) of both herbaceous and woody hosts (e.g. Keykhasaber et al., 2018).
Plants for planting is a significant pathway to strawberry fruit hydroponic production.

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 

Justification:
 
Disease symptoms may comprise wilting, chlorosis, stunting, necrosis and vein clearing. Brown vascular discoloration may be observed in stem tissue cross-sections (Frandin & Thomma, 2006). Symptoms of Verticillium wilt diseases can vary between hosts; thus, there are no unique symptoms that develop on all plants infected by V. dahliae (Fradin & Thomma, 2006). Moreover, symptoms can vary depending upon strains (pathotypes) of the pathogen (Korolev et al., 2008; Jiménez-Díaz et al., 2012; cited in EFSA, 2014).
Strawberry plants infected with Verticillium dahliae may initially be stunted. Outer leaves exhibit marginal and interveinal browning, followed by eventual collapse; inner leaves remain green. This last symptom sometimes helps to distinguish this disease from Phytophthora crown rot. The fungus is especially destructive in semi-arid areas where soils are irrigated. Inoculum densities may be high following planting of susceptible crops (e.g., lettuce). Disease severity is greater when high levels of nitrogen are used. Various cultivars differ in their susceptibility to Verticillium dahliae (UC PMG, 2018).
Verticillium wilt of strawberry occurs throughout the temperate zones of the world, but is most prevalent and destructive in irrigated semiarid areas. The widespread strains of Verticillium that attack potato, tomato, and cotton are also pathogenic to strawberries. Thus the disease, if unchecked, has the potential to eliminate commercial strawberry production in many localitiess (APS, 1998).
Especially strawberry crops following tomato, potato and cotton were devastated. Also common weeds can be symptomless host to V. dahliae and increased the problem. In strawberry without soil fumigation, losses of up to 75% have been recorded (Talboys, 1975; Wilhelm & Paulus, 1980).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
No

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
Healthy plant material
Resistant cultivars

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Recommended for listing as an RNQP, based on EPPO PM4 Standard.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
No

Proposed Risk management measure:
 


REFERENCES:
  • APS (1998) Verticillium wilts. In Compendium of strawberry diseases. American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, MN, USA. pages 51-52
  • CABI (2020) Verticillium dahliae (verticillium wilt), CABI Digital Library (Accessed 30/May/2024).
  • EFSA (2014) Scientific opinion on the pest categorisation of Verticillium dahliae Kleb.1. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH). EFSA Journal 12(12), 3928, 54 pp.
  • Fradin EF & Thomma BP (2006) Physiology and molecular aspects of Verticillium wilt diseases caused by V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum. Molecular Plant Pathology 7(2), 71-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00323.x.
  • Harris DC & Yang JR (1996) The relationship between the amount of Verticillium dahliae in soil and the incidence of strawberry wilt as a basis for disease risk prediction. Plant Pathology 45(1), 106-114.
  • Jiménez-Díaz RM, Cirulli M, Bubici G, Jiménez-Gasco MM, Antoniou PP & Tjamos EC (2012). Verticillium wilt: a major threat to olive production. Current status and future prospects for its management. Plant Disease 96, 304–329.
  • Keykhasaber M., Thomma BPHJ & Hiemstra JA (2018) Verticillium wilt caused by Verticillium dahliae in woody plants with emphasis on olive and shade trees. European Journal of Plant Pathology 150, 21-37.
  • Korolev N, Pérez-Artés E, Mercado-Blanco J, Bejarano-Alcázar J, Rodríguez-Jurado D, Jiménez-Díaz RM &, Katan T & Katan J (2008) Vegetative compatibility of cotton-defoliating Verticillium dahliae in Israel and its pathogenicity to various crop plants. European Journal of Plant Pathology 122, 603–617. DOI 10.1007/s10658-008-9330-1
  • Mol L, Halteren JM van, Scholte K & Struik PC (1996) Effects of crop species, crop cultivars and isolates of Verticillium dahliae on the population of microsclerotia in the soil, and consequences for crop yield. Plant Pathology 45(2), 205-214.
  • Pullman GS & DeVay JE (1982) Epidemiology of Verticillium wilt of cotton: a relationship between inoculum density and disease progression. Phytopathology 72(5), 549-554.
  • Smith IM, Dunez J, Phillips DH, Lelliot RA & Archer SA (eds) (1988) European handbook of diseases: Verticillium dahlia Kleb. and Verticillium albo-atrum Reinke & Berthold. Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford, UK. 299-302.
  • Talboys PW (1984) Chemical control of verticillium wilts. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 23(2/3),163-175..
  • Wilhelm S (1955) Longevity of Verticillium wilt fungus in the laboratory and the field. Phytopathology 45, 180-181.
  • Wilhelm S & Paulus AO (1980) How soil fumigation benefits the California strawberry industry. Plant Disease 64, 264-270.
  • UC PMG (2018) Verticillium wilt. In Pest management guidelines for agriculture – Strawberry. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, publication 3468, pages 1 & 90-92.
  • Xiao CL & Subbarao KV (1998) Relationships between Verticillium dahliae inoculum density and wilt incidence, severity, and growth of cauliflower. Phytopathology 88(10), 1108-1115.

HOST PLANT N°4: Malus (1MABG) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Remark: Inspection for ' Verticillium spp.' recommended in EPPO Standard PM 4-27 Pathogen-tested material of Malus, Pyrus and Cydonia.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
?
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate by default

 
Justification:
 
Verticillium dahliae is a soil-borne fungus that causes Verticillium wilt diseases in an extremely wide host range of annual and perennial dicotyledonous plant. Its primary economic hosts include: artichoke, aubergine, bell pepper, cotton, hop, lettuce, mints (Mentha spp.), oilseed rape, olive, potato, strawberry and tomato (CABI, 2021); citrus and pome fruits, however, are the exception (Smith et al. 1988).
Verticillium dahliae can survive for 14 years in soil as microsclerotia (form of resting spores) (Wilhelm, 1955), either free or embedded in plant debris, which are stimulated to germinate in response to root exudates (Mol, 1995). Infection of plants, both individuals and populations, is directly related to the inoculum density of microsclerotia in the soil (Pullman & DeVay, 1982; Harris & Yang, 1996; Mol et al., 1996; Xiao & Subbarao, 1998).
Verticillium dahliae is seed transmitted (CABI, 2021)
Verticillium dahliae can easily be dispersed by propagation material (nursery stock) of both herbaceous and woody hosts (e.g. Keykhasaber et al., 2018).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
No

Justification:
 
Disease symptoms may comprise wilting, chlorosis, stunting, necrosis and vein clearing. Brown vascular discoloration may be observed in stem tissue cross-sections (Frandin & Thomma, 2006). Symptoms of Verticillium wilt diseases can vary between hosts; thus, there are no unique symptoms that develop on all plants infected by V. dahliae (Fradin and Thomma, 2006). Moreover, symptoms can vary depending upon strains (pathotypes) of the pathogen (Korolev et al., 2008; Jiménez-Díaz et al., 2012).
For pome fruits: diseases caused by Verticillium spp. are not mentioned in the crop compendium for disease in pome fruits of the American Phytopathological Society (Sutton et al., 2014), also Smith et al (1988) indicate that an pome fruits seem to be the exception to susceptibility for Verticillium spp.
When testing the reaction of five apple cultivars to infection with V. dahliae, Karajeh & Owais (2012) has shown that only one cultivar (cv. Delicious Anbari) produced typical wilt symptoms (with only 8% disease severity), whereas scions of the other four apple cultivars (Royal Gala, Double Red, Golden Delicious, and Granny Smith) did not show any symptoms. By contrast, inoculation of an olive cultivar (Nabali Mohassan) caused typical symptoms with 61% severity.
[In the responses to the questionnaire, NL and SI supported deregulation in the EU. NL commented that Malus was not an important host. Although Verticillium species can cause dieback, SI considered that infections of Malus are relatively rare.]

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 
No

Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

Justification:
 
Remark: no reason to consider possible unacceptable economic impact to other hosts with this species more than with another species which is not regulated at present.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: no report of economic impact on this host.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2020) Verticillium dahliae (verticillium wilt), CABI Digital Library (Accessed 30/May/2024).
  • EFSA (2014) Scientific opinion on the pest categorisation of Verticillium dahliae Kleb.1. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH). EFSA Journal 12(12), 3928, 54 pp.
  • Fradin EF & Thomma BP (2006). Physiology and molecular aspects of Verticillium wilt diseases caused by V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum. Molecular Plant Pathology 7(2), 71-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00323.x.
  • Harris DC & Yang JR (1996). The relationship between the amount of Verticillium dahliae in soil and the incidence of strawberry wilt as a basis for disease risk prediction. Plant Pathology 45(1), 106-114.
  • Jiménez-Díaz RM, Cirulli M, Bubici G, Jiménez-Gasco MM, Antoniou PP & Tjamos EC (2012). Verticillium wilt: a major threat to olive production. Current status and future prospects for its management. Plant Disease 96, 304–329.
  • Karajeh MR & Owais SJ (2012) Reaction of selected apple cultivars to wilt pathogen Verticillium dahlia. Plant Protection Science 48, 99–104.
  • Keykhasaber M., Thomma BPHJ & Hiemstra JA (2018) Verticillium wilt caused by Verticillium dahliae in woody plants with emphasis on olive and shade trees. European Journal of Plant Pathology 150, 21-37.
  • Korolev N, Pérez-Artés E, Mercado-Blanco J, Bejarano-Alcázar J, Rodríguez-Jurado D, Jiménez-Díaz RM &, Katan T & Katan J (2008) Vegetative compatibility of cotton-defoliating Verticillium dahliae in Israel and its pathogenicity to various crop plants. European Journal of Plant Pathology 122, 603–617. DOI 10.1007/s10658-008-9330-1
  • Mol L, Halteren JM van, Scholte K & Struik PC (1996). Effects of crop species, crop cultivars and isolates of Verticillium dahliae on the population of microsclerotia in the soil, and consequences for crop yield. Plant Pathology 45(2), 205-214.
  • Pullman GS & DeVay JE (1982). Epidemiology of Verticillium wilt of cotton: a relationship between inoculum density and disease progression. Phytopathology 72(5), 549-554.
  • Smith IM, Dunez J, Phillips DH, Lelliot RA & Archer SA (eds) (1988) European handbook of diseases: Verticillium dahlia Kleb. and Verticillium albo-atrum Reinke & Berthold. Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford, UK. 299-302.
  • Sutton TB, Aldwinckle HS, Agnello AM & Walgenbach JF (2014). Compendium of Apple and Pear Diseases and Pests 2nd edition. American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, MN, USA
  • Wilhelm S (1955) Longevity of Verticillium wilt fungus in the laboratory and the field. Phytopathology 45, 180-181.
  • Xiao CL & Subbarao KV (1998). Relationships between Verticillium dahliae inoculum density and wilt incidence, severity, and growth of cauliflower. Phytopathology 88(10), 1108-1115

HOST PLANT N°5: Olea europaea (OLVEU) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Qualified

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
EPPO Standard PM 4/17 Certification scheme for olive trees and rootstock recommends testing for Verticillium dahliae.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
 
Conclusion:
 

 
Justification:
 

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 

Justification:
 

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Recommended for listing as an RNQP, based on EPPO PM 4 Standard. Remark: as for other hosts, there is uncertainty whether plants for planting is a significant pathway.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
The Fruit SEWG recommended that testing the plants is also performed for CAC mother plants, and testing the soil where CAC material is going to be planted or use of pest-free soil (as recommended in the PM 4 Standard). Soil requirements (testing or use of pest-free soil) should also apply to basic and certified material. The reason for setting higher level measures on olive is the existing problems with this pest.

Justification (if necessary):
 
The reason for setting higher level measures on olive is the existing problems with this pest.

REFERENCES:

HOST PLANT N°6: Pistacia vera (PIAVE) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
?
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate by default

 
Justification:
 
Verticillium dahliae is a soil-borne fungus that causes Verticillium wilt diseases in an extremely wide host range of annual and perennial dicotyledonous plant. Its primary economic hosts include: artichoke, aubergine, bell pepper, cotton, hop, lettuce, mints (Mentha spp.), oilseed rape, olive, potato, strawberry, tomato (CABI, 2021) and pistachio (UC PMG, 2019); citrus and pome fruits, however, are the exception (Smith et al. 1988).
Verticillium dahliae can survive for 14 years in soil as microsclerotia (form of resting spores) (Wilhelm, 1955), either free or embedded in plant debris, which are stimulated to germinate in response to root exudates (Mol, 1995). Infection of plants, both individuals and populations, is directly related to the inoculum density of microsclerotia in the soil (Pullman & DeVay, 1982; Harris & Yang, 1996; Mol et al., 1996; Xiao & Subbarao, 1998).
Verticillium dahliae is seed transmitted (CABI, 2021)
Verticillium dahliae can easily be dispersed by propagation material (nursery stock) of both herbaceous and woody hosts (e.g. Keykhasaber et al., 2018).
Verticillium wilt is favored by cool temperatures. Extended spring weather and mild summers often are accompanied by severe losses to this disease. The fungus apparently is eliminated from aboveground portions of pistachio trees in hot summer weather. Repeated attacks of wilt apparently represent new infections each year (UC PMG, 2019).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Generally Verticillium wilt causes a rapid desiccation and death of one or more scaffolds or the entire pistachio tree, usually in late spring or early summer. The first symptoms are interveinal patches of yellowing or scorching of the leaves on affected branches. In some instances, however, it may also cause a condition known as thin leaf decline where the disease develops slowly over several years before the tree becomes economically unproductive or dies. Thin leaf decline is characterized by slow loss of vigour, reduction in growth and yield, and gradual thinning of the canopy until most of the remaining leaves are clustered in tufts at the ends of branches and shoots (UC IPM, 2019).
Fotoohiyan et al (2014) reported that Verticillium dahliae is one of the most devastating diseases in pistachio orchards in the world including Iran; historically it is also the most destructive disease for pistachio in California (Trouillas, 2017). However, this is more linked to infected fields than to infected plant material. Solutions are found in control and resistant/tolerant rootstocks (Epstein et al., 2004; Triki et al., 2014; Fotoohiyan et al., 2014;). In California, resistant rootstocks have solved the problem (Trouillas, 2017).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Major

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
No

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Healthy soil
Healthy propagation material
Healthy seed (rootstock seedlings)
Reduction of fungal presence: Verticillium is very common when orchards are planted in soil formerly planted to susceptible row crops such as cotton, tomatoes, melons, etc. Avoid interplanting young orchards with these susceptible crop plants. Inoculum levels can be reduced by flooding in summer, solarizing the soil, growing several seasons of grass rotational crops (especially rye or sudangrass), or a combination of these treatments. When replanting in an area where susceptible perennials were previously grown, try to remove as many roots of the previous crop as possible. Fumigating with chloropicrin before planting will reduce inoculum (UC IPM, 2023).
Solutions are found in control and resistant/tolerant rootstocks (Fotoohiyan et al., 2014; Epstein et al., 2004).

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate by default

Justification:
 
Uncertainty whether plants for planting is a significant pathway compared to infection from soil.

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Recommended for listing as an RNQP, by default (uncertainty on plants for planting being a significant pathway). Conclusion was that there is insufficient evidence to recommend changes from the current regulation and measures.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
No

Proposed Risk management measure:
 


REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2020) Verticillium dahliae (verticillium wilt), CABI Digital Library (Accessed 30/May/2024).
  • Fradin EF & Thomma BP (2006). Physiology and molecular aspects of Verticillium wilt diseases caused by V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum. Molecular Plant Pathology 7(2), 71-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00323.x.
  • Epstein L, Beede R, Kaur S & Ferguson L (2004). Rootstock effects on pistachio trees grown in Verticillium dahliae-infested soil. Phytopathology 94:388-395.
  • Fotoohiyan Z, Rezaee S, Shahidi Bonjar GH, Mohammadi AH & Moradi M (2014). Biocontrol potential of Trichoderma harzianum in controlling wilt disease of pistachio caused by Verticillium dahliae. Journal of Plant Protection Research 57(2), 185–193. DOI: 10.1515/jppr-2017-0025
  • Harris DC & Yang JR (1996). The relationship between the amount of Verticillium dahliae in soil and the incidence of strawberry wilt as a basis for disease risk prediction. Plant Pathology 45(1), 106-114.
  • Keykhasaber M., Thomma BPHJ & Hiemstra JA (2018) Verticillium wilt caused by Verticillium dahliae in woody plants with emphasis on olive and shade trees. European Journal of Plant Pathology 150, 21-37.
  • Mol L, Halteren JM van, Scholte K & Struik PC (1996). Effects of crop species, crop cultivars and isolates of Verticillium dahliae on the population of microsclerotia in the soil, and consequences for crop yield. Plant Pathology 45(2), 205-214.
  • Pullman GS & DeVay JE (1982). Epidemiology of Verticillium wilt of cotton: a relationship between inoculum density and disease progression. Phytopathology 72(5), 549-554.
  • Smith IM, Dunez J, Phillips DH, Lelliot RA & Archer SA (eds) (1988) European handbook of diseases: Verticillium dahlia Kleb. and Verticillium albo-atrum Reinke & Berthold. Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford, UK. 299-302.
  • Triki MA, Chelli Chaabouni A, Rhouma A, Cheffi M, Mseddi A & Boudaya M (2014) Evaluation of susceptibility of pistacia genotypes to verticillium wilt disease. Acta Horticulturae 1028, 205-210.
  • Trouillas F (2017) Soil-Borne Diseases of Pistachio. Powerpoint presentation (Accessed 30/Jul/2024). https://ucanr.edu/sites/PistachioShortCourse/files/274452.pdf.
  • UC PMG (2019) Verticillium wilt. In Pest management guidelines for agriculture – Pistachio. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, publication 3461, page 62. https://anrcatalog.ucanr.edu/Details.aspx?itemNo=3461.
  • Wilhelm S (1955) Longevity of Verticillium wilt fungus in the laboratory and the field. Phytopathology 45, 180-181.
  • Xiao CL & Subbarao KV (1998). Relationships between Verticillium dahliae inoculum density and wilt incidence, severity, and growth of cauliflower. Phytopathology 88(10), 1108-1115

HOST PLANT N°7: Prunus armeniaca (PRNAR) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Remark: The assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
?
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate by default

 
Justification:
 
Verticillium dahlia is a soil-borne fungus that causes Verticillium wilt diseases in an extremely wide host range of annual and perennial dicotyledonous plant. Its primary economic hosts include: artichoke, aubergine, bell pepper, cotton, hop, lettuce, mints (Mentha spp.), oilseed rape, olive, potato, strawberry, tomato (CABI, 2021) and apricot (UC PMG, 2023); citrus and pome fruits, however, are the exception (Smith et al. 1988).
Verticillium dahliae can survive for 14 years in soil as microsclerotia (form of resting spores) (Wilhelm, 1955), either free or embedded in plant debris, which are stimulated to germinate in response to root exudates (Mol, 1995). Infection of plants, both individuals and populations, is directly related to the inoculum density of microsclerotia in the soil (Pullman & DeVay, 1982; Harris & Yang, 1996; Mol et al., 1996; Xiao & Subbarao, 1998).
Verticillium dahliae is seed transmitted (CABI, 2021)
Verticillium dahliae can easily be dispersed by propagation material (nursery stock) of both herbaceous and woody hosts (e.g. Keykhasaber et al., 2018).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Disease symptoms may comprise wilting, chlorosis, stunting, necrosis and vein clearing. Brown vascular discoloration may be observed in stem tissue cross-sections (Frandin & Thomma, 2006). Symptoms of Verticillium wilt diseases can vary between hosts; thus, there are no unique symptoms that develop on all plants infected by V. dahliae (Fradin and Thomma, 2006). Moreover, symptoms can vary depending upon strains (pathotypes) of the pathogen (Korolev et al., 2008; Jiménez-Díaz et al., 2012).
Verticillium wilt becomes apparent when leaves on one or more branches, often on only one side of the apricot tree, turn yellow and/or wilt early in the growing season. The symptoms progress until the infected shoots die and dry in a curled position often called a "shepherd's crook". When shoot, branch, or trunk tissue of infected trees is dissected, the vascular ring and often much of the heartwood will display dark discoloration. Foliar symptoms usually appear only on young trees (2nd to 4th leaf). Older trees do not normally present symptoms of Verticillium wilt. Apricot tree yields can be reduced by Verticillium, even when foliar symptoms are not readily apparent. Specific rootstock and scion varieties may vary in susceptibility and are not well known. Orchards can be adversely affected by the disease even when low pathogen numbers in soil (2–3 propagules per gram) are present. Verticillium is very common when orchards are planted in soil formerly planted to susceptible row crops such as cotton, tomatoes, melons, etc. (UC IPM, 2023).
On apricot, initial symptoms appear as a sudden wilting of leaves on one or more branches in early summer. Leaves become dull in appearance and rapidly tan and wither. Often the leaves remain attached, resulting in a one-sided, flagged appearance. At times, symptoms develop on leaves at the base of branches and progress upward until the entire branch is affected. Young trees may be killed by this pathogen, but affected branches of older trees may leaf out the following year, only to be attacked again. The result of repeated wilting is generally stunted terminal growth and low productivity or death (Gubler, 1995).
[In the responses to the questionnaire, SI supported deregulation in the EU because infections of Prunus spp. are relatively rare.]

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Medium

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
No

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Economic impact assessed for rootstocks

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Healthy soil
Healthy propagation material
Healthy seed (rootstock seedlings)
Reduction of fungal presence: Verticillium is very common when orchards are planted in soil formerly planted to susceptible row crops such as cotton, tomatoes, melons, etc. Avoid interplanting young orchards with these susceptible crop plants. Inoculum levels can be reduced by flooding in summer, solarizing the soil, growing several seasons of grass rotational crops (especially rye or sudangrass), or a combination of these treatments. When replanting in an area where susceptible perennials were previously grown, try to remove as many roots of the previous crop as possible. Fumigating with chloropicrin before planting will reduce inoculum (UC IPM, 2023).

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate by default

Justification:
 
Uncertainty whether plants for planting is a significant pathway compared to infection from soil.

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Recommended for listing as an RNQP, by default (uncertainty on plants for planting being a significant pathway). Conclusion was that there is insufficient evidence to recommend changes from the current regulation and measures.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
No

Proposed Risk management measure:
 


REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2020) Verticillium dahliae (verticillium wilt), CABI Digital Library (Accessed 30/May/2024).
  • EFSA (2014) Scientific opinion on the pest categorisation of Verticillium dahliae Kleb.1. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH). EFSA Journal 12(12), 3928, 54 pp.
  • Fradin EF & Thomma BP (2006). Physiology and molecular aspects of Verticillium wilt diseases caused by V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum. Molecular Plant Pathology 7(2), 71-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00323.x.
  • Gubler WD (1995). Verticillium wilt. In Compendium of stone fruit diseases (eds Ogawa JM, Zehr EI, Bird GW, Ritchie DF, Uriu K & Uyemoto JK). American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, MN, USA. pages 40-41,
  • Harris DC & Yang JR (1996). The relationship between the amount of Verticillium dahliae in soil and the incidence of strawberry wilt as a basis for disease risk prediction. Plant Pathology 45(1), 106-114.
  • Jiménez-Díaz RM, Cirulli M, Bubici G, Jiménez-Gasco MM, Antoniou PP & Tjamos EC (2012). Verticillium wilt: a major threat to olive production. Current status and future prospects for its management. Plant Disease 96, 304–329.
  • Keykhasaber M., Thomma BPHJ & Hiemstra JA (2018) Verticillium wilt caused by Verticillium dahliae in woody plants with emphasis on olive and shade trees. European Journal of Plant Pathology 150, 21-37.
  • Korolev N, Pérez-Artés E, Mercado-Blanco J, Bejarano-Alcázar J, Rodríguez-Jurado D, Jiménez-Díaz RM &, Katan T & Katan J (2008) Vegetative compatibility of cotton-defoliating Verticillium dahliae in Israel and its pathogenicity to various crop plants. European Journal of Plant Pathology 122, 603–617. DOI 10.1007/s10658-008-9330-1
  • Mol L, Halteren JM van, Scholte K & Struik PC (1996). Effects of crop species, crop cultivars and isolates of Verticillium dahliae on the population of microsclerotia in the soil, and consequences for crop yield. Plant Pathology 45(2), 205-214.
  • Pullman GS & DeVay JE (1982). Epidemiology of Verticillium wilt of cotton: a relationship between inoculum density and disease progression. Phytopathology 72(5), 549-554.
  • Smith IM, Dunez J, Phillips DH, Lelliot RA & Archer SA (eds) (1988) European handbook of diseases: Verticillium dahlia Kleb. and Verticillium albo-atrum Reinke & Berthold. Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford, UK. 299-302.
  • UC IPM (2023) Verticillium wilt. In Pest management guidelines for agriculture – Apricot. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, publication 3433, pages 78-79.. https://anrcatalog.ucanr.edu/Details.aspx?itemNo=3433. 
  • Wilhelm S (1955) Longevity of Verticillium wilt fungus in the laboratory and the field. Phytopathology 45, 180-181.
  • Xiao CL & Subbarao KV (1998). Relationships between Verticillium dahliae inoculum density and wilt incidence, severity, and growth of cauliflower. Phytopathology 88(10), 1108-1115.

HOST PLANT N°8: Prunus domestica (PRNDO) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Remark: The assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
?
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate by default

 
Justification:
 
Verticillium dahlia is a soil-borne fungus that causes Verticillium wilt diseases in an extremely wide host range of annual and perennial dicotyledonous plant. Its primary economic hosts include: artichoke, aubergine, bell pepper, cotton, hop, lettuce, mints (Mentha spp.), oilseed rape, olive, potato, strawberry and tomato (CABI, 2021); citrus and pome fruits, however, are the exception (Smith et al. 1988).
Verticillium dahliae can survive for 14 years in soil as microsclerotia (form of resting spores) (Wilhelm, 1955), either free or embedded in plant debris, which are stimulated to germinate in response to root exudates (Mol, 1995). Infection of plants, both individuals and populations, is directly related to the inoculum density of microsclerotia in the soil (Pullman & DeVay, 1982; Harris & Yang, 1996; Mol et al., 1996; Xiao & Subbarao, 1998).
Verticillium dahliae is seed transmitted (CABI, 2021)
Verticillium dahliae can easily be dispersed by propagation material (nursery stock) of both herbaceous and woody hosts (e.g. Keykhasaber et al., 2018).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Disease symptoms may comprise wilting, chlorosis, stunting, necrosis and vein clearing. Brown vascular discoloration may be observed in stem tissue cross-sections (Frandin & Thomma, 2006). Symptoms of Verticillium wilt diseases can vary between hosts; thus, there are no unique symptoms that develop on all plants infected by V. dahliae (Fradin and Thomma, 2006). Moreover, symptoms can vary depending upon strains (pathotypes) of the pathogen (Korolev et al., 2008; Jiménez-Díaz et al., 2012).
Verticillium wilt occurs on plum, but as a group plum is least affected of the Prunus spp. (Gubler, 1995).
[In the responses to the questionnaire, SI supported deregulation in the EU because infections of Prunus spp. are relatively rare].

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Minor

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
Yes

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

Justification:
 
Based on general information for Prunus spp. No specific information.
Remark: no reason to consider possible unacceptable economic impact to other hosts with this species more than with another species which is not regulated at present.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Healthy soil
Healthy propagation material
Healthy seed (rootstock seedlings)
Reduction of fungal presence: Verticillium is very common when orchards are planted in soil formerly planted to susceptible row crops such as cotton, tomatoes, melons, etc. Avoid interplanting young orchards with these susceptible crop plants. Inoculum levels can be reduced by flooding in summer, solarizing the soil, growing several seasons of grass rotational crops (especially rye or sudangrass), or a combination of these treatments. When replanting in an area where susceptible perennials were previously grown, try to remove as many roots of the previous crop as possible. Fumigating with chloropicrin before planting will reduce inoculum (UC IPM, 2023).

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate by default

Justification:
 
Uncertainty whether plants for planting is a significant pathway compared to infection from soil.

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: economic impact considered acceptable.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2020) Verticillium dahliae (verticillium wilt), CABI Digital Library (Accessed 30/May/2024).
  • EFSA (2014) Scientific opinion on the pest categorisation of Verticillium dahliae Kleb.1. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH). EFSA Journal 12(12), 3928, 54 pp.
  • Fradin EF & Thomma BP (2006). Physiology and molecular aspects of Verticillium wilt diseases caused by V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum. Molecular Plant Pathology 7(2), 71-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00323.x.
  • Gubler WD (1995). Verticillium wilt. In Compendium of stone fruit diseases (eds Ogawa JM, Zehr EI, Bird GW, Ritchie DF, Uriu K & Uyemoto JK). American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, MN, USA. pages 40-41,
  • Harris DC & Yang JR (1996). The relationship between the amount of Verticillium dahliae in soil and the incidence of strawberry wilt as a basis for disease risk prediction. Plant Pathology 45(1), 106-114.
  • Jiménez-Díaz RM, Cirulli M, Bubici G, Jiménez-Gasco MM, Antoniou PP & Tjamos EC (2012). Verticillium wilt: a major threat to olive production. Current status and future prospects for its management. Plant Disease 96, 304–329.
  • Keykhasaber M., Thomma BPHJ & Hiemstra JA (2018) Verticillium wilt caused by Verticillium dahliae in woody plants with emphasis on olive and shade trees. European Journal of Plant Pathology 150, 21-37.
  • Korolev N, Pérez-Artés E, Mercado-Blanco J, Bejarano-Alcázar J, Rodríguez-Jurado D, Jiménez-Díaz RM &, Katan T & Katan J (2008) Vegetative compatibility of cotton-defoliating Verticillium dahliae in Israel and its pathogenicity to various crop plants. European Journal of Plant Pathology 122, 603–617. DOI 10.1007/s10658-008-9330-1
  • Mol L, Halteren JM van, Scholte K & Struik PC (1996). Effects of crop species, crop cultivars and isolates of Verticillium dahliae on the population of microsclerotia in the soil, and consequences for crop yield. Plant Pathology 45(2), 205-214.
  • Pullman GS & DeVay JE (1982). Epidemiology of Verticillium wilt of cotton: a relationship between inoculum density and disease progression. Phytopathology 72(5), 549-554.
  • Smith IM, Dunez J, Phillips DH, Lelliot RA & Archer SA (eds) (1988) European handbook of diseases: Verticillium dahlia Kleb. and Verticillium albo-atrum Reinke & Berthold. Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford, UK. 299-302.
  • Wilhelm S (1955) Longevity of Verticillium wilt fungus in the laboratory and the field. Phytopathology 45, 180-181.
  • Xiao CL & Subbarao KV (1998). Relationships between Verticillium dahliae inoculum density and wilt incidence, severity, and growth of cauliflower. Phytopathology 88(10), 1108-1115

HOST PLANT N°9: Prunus dulcis (PRNDU) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Remark: The assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
?
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate by default

 
Justification:
 
Verticillium dahlia is a soil-borne fungus that causes Verticillium wilt diseases in an extremely wide host range of annual and perennial dicotyledonous plant. Its primary economic hosts include: artichoke, aubergine, bell pepper, cotton, hop, lettuce, mints (Mentha spp.), oilseed rape, olive, potato, strawberry and tomato (CABI, 2021); citrus and pome fruits, however, are the exception (Smith et al. 1988).
Verticillium dahliae can survive for 14 years in soil as microsclerotia (form of resting spores) (Wilhelm, 1955), either free or embedded in plant debris, which are stimulated to germinate in response to root exudates (Mol, 1995). Infection of plants, both individuals and populations, is directly related to the inoculum density of microsclerotia in the soil (Pullman & DeVay, 1982; Harris & Yang, 1996; Mol et al., 1996; Xiao & Subbarao, 1998).
Verticillium dahliae is seed transmitted (CABI, 2021)
Verticillium dahliae can easily be dispersed by propagation material (nursery stock) of both herbaceous and woody hosts (e.g. Keykhasaber et al., 2018).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Disease symptoms may comprise wilting, chlorosis, stunting, necrosis and vein clearing. Brown vascular discoloration may be observed in stem tissue cross-sections (Frandin & Thomma, 2006). Symptoms of Verticillium wilt diseases can vary between hosts; thus, there are no unique symptoms that develop on all plants infected by V. dahliae (Fradin and Thomma, 2006). Moreover, symptoms can vary depending upon strains (pathotypes) of the pathogen (Korolev et al., 2008; Jiménez-Díaz et al., 2012; cited in EFSA, 2014).
Leaves on one or more branches, often on only one side of the tree, will turn yellow or wilt early in the growing season. The symptoms progress until the affected shoots die and dry up later in the season. Affected young shoots often resemble a shepherd's hook. When shoot, branch, or trunk tissue of infected trees is cut in cross section, the vascular ring and often much of the heartwood will display dark discoloration. Foliar symptoms usually appear only on young trees (first to fifth or sixth leaf). Older trees do not normally exhibit symptoms of Verticillium wilt. Research has shown that trees’ yields can be reduced by Verticillium wilt, even when foliar symptoms are not readily apparent. Specific rootstock or scion varieties may vary in susceptibility. Second-to fourth-year trees are usually the most susceptible to Verticillium wilt (UC IPM, 2019).
On almond, initial symptoms appear as a sudden wilting of leaves on one or more branches in early summer. Leaves become dull in appearance and rapidly tan and wither. Often the leaves remain attached, resulting in a one-sided, flagged appearance. At times, symptoms develop on leaves at the base of branches and progress upward until the entire branch is affected. Young trees may be killed by this pathogen, but affected branches of older trees may leaf out the following year, only to be attacked again. The result of repeated wilting is generally stunted terminal growth and low productivity or death (Gubler, 1995).
Almond wilt due to V. dahliae, also known as ‘black heart', is an occasionally serious disease problem in Californian orchards (US). Verticillium wilt is most severe on trees 2–6-year-old, and symptoms lessen as trees mature. Usually only a few trees in a young orchard are affected, though sometimes many young trees die. Severe economic losses of 9000-11 000 USD per ha resulting from verticillium wilt in almond orchards have been recorded (Stapleton, 1997).
[In the responses to the questionnaire, SI supported deregulation in the EU because infections of Prunus spp. are relatively rare.]

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Major

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
No

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Healthy soil
Healthy propagation material
Healthy seed (rootstock seedlings)
Reduction of fungal presence: Verticillium is very common when orchards are planted in soil formerly planted to susceptible row crops such as cotton, tomatoes, melons, etc. Avoid interplanting young orchards with these susceptible crop plants. Inoculum levels can be reduced by flooding in summer, solarizing the soil, growing several seasons of grass rotational crops (especially rye or sudangrass), or a combination of these treatments. When replanting in an area where susceptible perennials were previously grown, try to remove as many roots of the previous crop as possible. Fumigating with chloropicrin before planting will reduce inoculum (UC IPM, 2023).

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate by default

Justification:
 
Uncertainty whether plants for planting is a significant pathway compared to infection from soil.

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Recommended for listing as an RNQP, by default (uncertainty on plants for planting being a significant pathway). Conclusion was that there is insufficient evidence to recommend changes from the current regulation and measures.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
No

Proposed Risk management measure:
 


REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2020) Verticillium dahliae (verticillium wilt), CABI Digital Library (Accessed 30/May/2024).
  • EFSA (2014) Scientific opinion on the pest categorisation of Verticillium dahliae Kleb.1. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH). EFSA Journal 12(12), 3928, 54 pp.
  • Fradin EF & Thomma BP (2006). Physiology and molecular aspects of Verticillium wilt diseases caused by V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum. Molecular Plant Pathology 7(2), 71-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00323.x.
  • Gubler WD (1995). Verticillium wilt. In Compendium of stone fruit diseases (eds Ogawa JM, Zehr EI, Bird GW, Ritchie DF, Uriu K & Uyemoto JK). American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, MN, USA. pages 40-41,
  • Harris DC & Yang JR (1996). The relationship between the amount of Verticillium dahliae in soil and the incidence of strawberry wilt as a basis for disease risk prediction. Plant Pathology 45(1), 106-114.
  • Jiménez-Díaz RM, Cirulli M, Bubici G, Jiménez-Gasco MM, Antoniou PP & Tjamos EC (2012). Verticillium wilt: a major threat to olive production. Current status and future prospects for its management. Plant Disease 96, 304–329.
  • Keykhasaber M., Thomma BPHJ & Hiemstra JA (2018) Verticillium wilt caused by Verticillium dahliae in woody plants with emphasis on olive and shade trees. European Journal of Plant Pathology 150, 21-37.
  • Korolev N, Pérez-Artés E, Mercado-Blanco J, Bejarano-Alcázar J, Rodríguez-Jurado D, Jiménez-Díaz RM &, Katan T & Katan J (2008) Vegetative compatibility of cotton-defoliating Verticillium dahliae in Israel and its pathogenicity to various crop plants. European Journal of Plant Pathology 122, 603–617. DOI 10.1007/s10658-008-9330-1
  • Mol L, Halteren JM van, Scholte K & Struik PC (1996). Effects of crop species, crop cultivars and isolates of Verticillium dahliae on the population of microsclerotia in the soil, and consequences for crop yield. Plant Pathology 45(2), 205-214.
  • Pullman GS & DeVay JE (1982). Epidemiology of Verticillium wilt of cotton: a relationship between inoculum density and disease progression. Phytopathology 72(5), 549-554.
  • Smith IM, Dunez J, Phillips DH, Lelliot RA & Archer SA (eds) (1988) European handbook of diseases: Verticillium dahlia Kleb. and Verticillium albo-atrum Reinke & Berthold. Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford, UK. 299-302.
  • Stapleton (1997) Verticillium wilt of almond in California. EPPO Bulletin 27, 489-492.
  • UC IPM (2019) Verticillium wilt. In Pest management guidelines for agriculture – Almond. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, publication 3431, pages 105-106. https://ipm.ucanr.edu/legacy_assets/PDF/PMG/pmgalmond.pdf. 
  • Wilhelm S (1955) Longevity of Verticillium wilt fungus in the laboratory and the field. Phytopathology 45, 180-181.
  • Xiao CL & Subbarao KV (1998). Relationships between Verticillium dahliae inoculum density and wilt incidence, severity, and growth of cauliflower. Phytopathology 88(10), 1108-1115

HOST PLANT N°10: Prunus persica (PRNPS) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Remark: The assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
?
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate by default

 
Justification:
 
Verticillium dahlia is a soil-borne fungus that causes Verticillium wilt diseases in an extremely wide host range of annual and perennial dicotyledonous plant. Its primary economic hosts include: artichoke, aubergine, bell pepper, cotton, hop, lettuce, mints (Mentha spp.), oilseed rape, olive, potato, strawberry and tomato (CABI, 2021); citrus and pome fruits, however, are the exception (Smith et al. 1988).
Verticillium dahliae can survive for 14 years in soil as microsclerotia (form of resting spores) (Wilhelm, 1955), either free or embedded in plant debris, which are stimulated to germinate in response to root exudates (Mol, 1995). Infection of plants, both individuals and populations, is directly related to the inoculum density of microsclerotia in the soil (Pullman & DeVay, 1982; Harris & Yang, 1996; Mol et al., 1996; Xiao & Subbarao, 1998).
Verticillium dahliae is seed transmitted (CABI, 2021)
Verticillium dahliae can easily be dispersed by propagation material (nursery stock) of both herbaceous and woody hosts (e.g. Keykhasaber et al., 2018).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Disease symptoms may comprise wilting, chlorosis, stunting, necrosis and vein clearing. Brown vascular discoloration may be observed in stem tissue cross-sections (Frandin & Thomma, 2006). Symptoms of Verticillium wilt diseases can vary between hosts; thus, there are no unique symptoms that develop on all plants infected by V. dahliae (Fradin and Thomma, 2006). Moreover, symptoms can vary depending upon strains (pathotypes) of the pathogen (Korolev et al., 2008; Jiménez-Díaz et al., 2012; cited in EFSA, 2014).
On peach, Verticillium wilt can be a serious disease in young trees and is known to occur in all major production areas of the United States, Canada, the Mediterranean Basin, Bulgaria, and New Zealand. However, some cultivars show almost complete recovery with age (Gubler, 1995).
Orchards can be adversely affected by the disease even when low pathogen numbers in soil (2–3 propagules per gram) are present. Avoid interplanting young orchards with susceptible crop plants, such as cotton, tomatoes, melons, etc. Verticillium dahliae is usually present in these soils. Inoculum levels can be reduced by fumigating the soil, flooding fallow fields in summer, solarizing the soil, growing several seasons of grass cover crops (especially sudangrass or ryegrass), or a combination of these methods. When replanting in an area where susceptible perennials were previously grown, try to remove as many roots of the previous crop as possible (UC PMG, 2017).
[In the responses to the questionnaire, SI supported deregulation in the EU because infections of Prunus spp. are relatively rare.]

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Major

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
No

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Verticillium wilt of stone fruits can best be controlled by planting in soil that has low or undetectable inoculum densities and that has been cropped to various grasses or other nonhosts, as there are no resistant rootstocks. Soil fumigation with chloropicrin or with methyl bromide and chloropicrin destroys inoculum of V. dahliae. Proper fertilization and irrigation of orchards may enable trees to recover from infection (Gubler, 1995).

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate by default

Justification:
 
Uncertainty whether plants for planting is a significant pathway compared to infection from soil.

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Recommended for listing as an RNQP, by default (uncertainty on plants for planting being a significant pathway). Conclusion was that there is insufficient evidence to recommend changes from the current regulation and measures.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
No

Proposed Risk management measure:
 


REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2020) Verticillium dahliae (verticillium wilt), CABI Digital Library (Accessed 30/May/2024).
  • EFSA (2014) Scientific opinion on the pest categorisation of Verticillium dahliae Kleb.1. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH). EFSA Journal 12(12), 3928, 54 pp.
  • Fradin EF & Thomma BP (2006). Physiology and molecular aspects of Verticillium wilt diseases caused by V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum. Molecular Plant Pathology 7(2), 71-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00323.x.
  • Gubler WD (1995). Verticillium wilt. In Compendium of stone fruit diseases (eds Ogawa JM, Zehr EI, Bird GW, Ritchie DF, Uriu K & Uyemoto JK). American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, MN, USA. pages 40-41,
  • Harris DC & Yang JR (1996). The relationship between the amount of Verticillium dahliae in soil and the incidence of strawberry wilt as a basis for disease risk prediction. Plant Pathology 45(1), 106-114.
  • Jiménez-Díaz RM, Cirulli M, Bubici G, Jiménez-Gasco MM, Antoniou PP & Tjamos EC (2012). Verticillium wilt: a major threat to olive production. Current status and future prospects for its management. Plant Disease 96, 304–329.
  • Keykhasaber M., Thomma BPHJ & Hiemstra JA (2018) Verticillium wilt caused by Verticillium dahliae in woody plants with emphasis on olive and shade trees. European Journal of Plant Pathology 150, 21-37.
  • Korolev N, Pérez-Artés E, Mercado-Blanco J, Bejarano-Alcázar J, Rodríguez-Jurado D, Jiménez-Díaz RM &, Katan T & Katan J (2008) Vegetative compatibility of cotton-defoliating Verticillium dahliae in Israel and its pathogenicity to various crop plants. European Journal of Plant Pathology 122, 603–617. DOI 10.1007/s10658-008-9330-1
  • Mol L, Halteren JM van, Scholte K & Struik PC (1996). Effects of crop species, crop cultivars and isolates of Verticillium dahliae on the population of microsclerotia in the soil, and consequences for crop yield. Plant Pathology 45(2), 205-214.
  • Pullman GS & DeVay JE (1982). Epidemiology of Verticillium wilt of cotton: a relationship between inoculum density and disease progression. Phytopathology 72(5), 549-554.
  • Smith IM, Dunez J, Phillips DH, Lelliot RA & Archer SA (eds) (1988) European handbook of diseases: Verticillium dahlia Kleb. and Verticillium albo-atrum Reinke & Berthold. Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford, UK. 299-302.
  • UC PMG (2017) Verticillium wilt. In Pest management guidelines for agriculture – Peach. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, publication 3431, pages 45-46.
  • Wilhelm S (1955) Longevity of Verticillium wilt fungus in the laboratory and the field. Phytopathology 45, 180-181.
  • Xiao CL & Subbarao KV (1998). Relationships between Verticillium dahliae inoculum density and wilt incidence, severity, and growth of cauliflower. Phytopathology 88(10), 1108-1115

HOST PLANT N°11: Prunus salicina (PRNSC) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Remark: The assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
?
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate by default

 
Justification:
 
Verticillium dahlia is a soil-borne fungus that causes Verticillium wilt diseases in an extremely wide host range of annual and perennial dicotyledonous plant. Its primary economic hosts include: artichoke, aubergine, bell pepper, cotton, hop, lettuce, mints (Mentha spp.), oilseed rape, olive, potato, strawberry and tomato (CABI, 2021); citrus and pome fruits, however, are the exception (Smith et al. 1988).
Verticillium dahliae can survive for 14 years in soil as microsclerotia (form of resting spores) (Wilhelm, 1955), either free or embedded in plant debris, which are stimulated to germinate in response to root exudates (Mol, 1995). Infection of plants, both individuals and populations, is directly related to the inoculum density of microsclerotia in the soil (Pullman & DeVay, 1982; Harris & Yang, 1996; Mol et al., 1996; Xiao & Subbarao, 1998).
Verticillium dahliae is seed transmitted (CABI, 2021)
Verticillium dahliae can easily be dispersed by propagation material (nursery stock) of both herbaceous and woody hosts (e.g. Keykhasaber et al., 2018).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Disease symptoms may comprise wilting, chlorosis, stunting, necrosis and vein clearing. Brown vascular discoloration may be observed in stem tissue cross-sections (Frandin & Thomma, 2006). Symptoms of Verticillium wilt diseases can vary between hosts; thus, there are no unique symptoms that develop on all plants infected by V. dahliae (Fradin and Thomma, 2006). Moreover, symptoms can vary depending upon strains (pathotypes) of the pathogen (Korolev et al., 2008; Jiménez-Díaz et al., 2012; cited in EFSA, 2014).
[In the responses to the questionnaire, SI supported deregulation in the EU because infections of Prunus spp. are relatively rare.]

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Minor

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
Yes

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

Justification:
 
Based on general information for Prunus spp. No specific information.
Remark: no reason to consider possible unacceptable economic impact to other hosts with this species more than with another species which is not regulated at present.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Verticillium wilt of stone fruits can best be controlled by planting in soil that has low or undetectable inoculum densities and that has been cropped to various grasses or other nonhosts, as there are no resistant rootstocks. Soil fumigation with chloropicrin or with methyl bromide and chloropicrin destroys inoculum of V. dahliae. Proper fertilization and irrigation of orchards may enable trees to recover from infection (Gubler, 1995).

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate by default

Justification:
 
Uncertainty whether plants for planting is a significant pathway compared to infection from soil.

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: economic impact considered acceptable.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2020) Verticillium dahliae (verticillium wilt), CABI Digital Library (Accessed 30/May/2024).
  • EFSA (2014) Scientific opinion on the pest categorisation of Verticillium dahliae Kleb.1. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH). EFSA Journal 12(12), 3928, 54 pp.
  • Fradin EF & Thomma BP (2006). Physiology and molecular aspects of Verticillium wilt diseases caused by V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum. Molecular Plant Pathology 7(2), 71-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00323.x.
  • Harris DC & Yang JR (1996). The relationship between the amount of Verticillium dahliae in soil and the incidence of strawberry wilt as a basis for disease risk prediction. Plant Pathology 45(1), 106-114.
  • Jiménez-Díaz RM, Cirulli M, Bubici G, Jiménez-Gasco MM, Antoniou PP & Tjamos EC (2012). Verticillium wilt: a major threat to olive production. Current status and future prospects for its management. Plant Disease 96, 304–329.
  • Keykhasaber M., Thomma BPHJ & Hiemstra JA (2018) Verticillium wilt caused by Verticillium dahliae in woody plants with emphasis on olive and shade trees. European Journal of Plant Pathology 150, 21-37.
  • Korolev N, Pérez-Artés E, Mercado-Blanco J, Bejarano-Alcázar J, Rodríguez-Jurado D, Jiménez-Díaz RM &, Katan T & Katan J (2008) Vegetative compatibility of cotton-defoliating Verticillium dahliae in Israel and its pathogenicity to various crop plants. European Journal of Plant Pathology 122, 603–617. DOI 10.1007/s10658-008-9330-1
  • Mol L, Halteren JM van, Scholte K & Struik PC (1996). Effects of crop species, crop cultivars and isolates of Verticillium dahliae on the population of microsclerotia in the soil, and consequences for crop yield. Plant Pathology 45(2), 205-214.
  • Pullman GS & DeVay JE (1982). Epidemiology of Verticillium wilt of cotton: a relationship between inoculum density and disease progression. Phytopathology 72(5), 549-554.
  • Smith IM, Dunez J, Phillips DH, Lelliot RA & Archer SA (eds) (1988) European handbook of diseases: Verticillium dahlia Kleb. and Verticillium albo-atrum Reinke & Berthold. Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford, UK. 299-302.
  • Wilhelm S (1955) Longevity of Verticillium wilt fungus in the laboratory and the field. Phytopathology 45, 180-181.
  • Xiao CL & Subbarao KV (1998). Relationships between Verticillium dahliae inoculum density and wilt incidence, severity, and growth of cauliflower. Phytopathology 88(10), 1108-1115

HOST PLANT N°12: Pyrus (1PYUG) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Remark: Inspection for ' Verticillium spp.' recommended in EPPO Standard PM 4-27 Pathogen-tested material of Malus, Pyrus and Cydonia.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
?
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate by default

 
Justification:
 
Verticillium dahliae is a soil-borne fungus that causes Verticillium wilt diseases in an extremely wide host range of annual and perennial dicotyledonous plant. Its primary economic hosts include: artichoke, aubergine, bell pepper, cotton, hop, lettuce, mints (Mentha spp.), oilseed rape, olive, potato, strawberry and tomato (CABI, 2021); citrus and pome fruits, however, are the exception (Smith et al. 1988).
Verticillium dahliae can survive for 14 years in soil as microsclerotia (form of resting spores) (Wilhelm, 1955), either free or embedded in plant debris, which are stimulated to germinate in response to root exudates (Mol, 1995). Infection of plants, both individuals and populations, is directly related to the inoculum density of microsclerotia in the soil (Pullman & DeVay, 1982; Harris & Yang, 1996; Mol et al., 1996; Xiao & Subbarao, 1998).
Verticillium dahliae is seed transmitted (CABI, 2021)
Verticillium dahliae can easily be dispersed by propagation material (nursery stock) of both herbaceous and woody hosts (e.g. Keykhasaber et al., 2018).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
No

Justification:
 
Disease symptoms may comprise wilting, chlorosis, stunting, necrosis and vein clearing. Brown vascular discoloration may be observed in stem tissue cross-sections (Frandin & Thomma, 2006). Symptoms of Verticillium wilt diseases can vary between hosts; thus, there are no unique symptoms that develop on all plants infected by V. dahliae (Fradin & Thomma, 2006). Moreover, symptoms can vary depending upon strains (pathotypes) of the pathogen (Korolev et al., 2008; Jiménez-Díaz et al., 2012).
For pome fruits diseases caused by Verticillium spp. are not mentioned in the crop compendium for disease in pome fruits of the American Phytopathological Society (Sutton et al., 2014), nor in the pest management guidelines for pear (UC PMG, 2017), also Smith et al (1988) indicate that an pome fruits seem to be the exception to susceptibility for Verticillium spp.
[In the responses to the questionnaire, NL and SI supported deregulation in the EU. NL commented that Pyrus was not an important host. Although Verticillium species can cause dieback, SI considered that infections of Pyrus are relatively rare.].

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 
No

Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

Justification:
 
Remark: no reason to consider possible unacceptable economic impact to other hosts with this species more than with another species which is not regulated at present.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: no report of economic impact on this host.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2020) Verticillium dahliae (verticillium wilt), CABI Digital Library (Accessed 30/May/2024).
  • EFSA (2014) Scientific opinion on the pest categorisation of Verticillium dahliae Kleb.1. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH). EFSA Journal 12(12), 3928, 54 pp.
  • Fradin EF & Thomma BP (2006). Physiology and molecular aspects of Verticillium wilt diseases caused by V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum. Molecular Plant Pathology 7(2), 71-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00323.x.
  • Harris DC & Yang JR (1996). The relationship between the amount of Verticillium dahliae in soil and the incidence of strawberry wilt as a basis for disease risk prediction. Plant Pathology 45(1), 106-114.
  • Jiménez-Díaz RM, Cirulli M, Bubici G, Jiménez-Gasco MM, Antoniou PP & Tjamos EC (2012). Verticillium wilt: a major threat to olive production. Current status and future prospects for its management. Plant Disease 96, 304–329.
  • Keykhasaber M., Thomma BPHJ & Hiemstra JA (2018) Verticillium wilt caused by Verticillium dahliae in woody plants with emphasis on olive and shade trees. European Journal of Plant Pathology 150, 21-37.
  • Korolev N, Pérez-Artés E, Mercado-Blanco J, Bejarano-Alcázar J, Rodríguez-Jurado D, Jiménez-Díaz RM &, Katan T & Katan J (2008) Vegetative compatibility of cotton-defoliating Verticillium dahliae in Israel and its pathogenicity to various crop plants. European Journal of Plant Pathology 122, 603–617. DOI 10.1007/s10658-008-9330-1
  • Mol L, Halteren JM van, Scholte K & Struik PC (1996). Effects of crop species, crop cultivars and isolates of Verticillium dahliae on the population of microsclerotia in the soil, and consequences for crop yield. Plant Pathology 45(2), 205-214.
  • Pullman GS & DeVay JE (1982). Epidemiology of Verticillium wilt of cotton: a relationship between inoculum density and disease progression. Phytopathology 72(5), 549-554.
  • Smith IM, Dunez J, Phillips DH, Lelliot RA & Archer SA (eds) (1988) European handbook of diseases: Verticillium dahlia Kleb. and Verticillium albo-atrum Reinke & Berthold. Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford, UK. 299-302.
  • Sutton TB, Aldwinckle HS, Agnello AM & Walgenbach JF (2014). Compendium of Apple and Pear Diseases and Pests 2nd edition. American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, MN, USA
  • UC PMG (2017) Verticillium wilt. In Pest management guidelines for agriculture – Pear. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, publication 3455.
  • Wilhelm S (1955) Longevity of Verticillium wilt fungus in the laboratory and the field. Phytopathology 45, 180-181.
  • Xiao CL & Subbarao KV (1998). Relationships between Verticillium dahliae inoculum density and wilt incidence, severity, and growth of cauliflower. Phytopathology 88(10), 1108-1115