Regulated Non-Quarantine Projects

Two EU funded projects for the benefit of the whole EPPO region

Legend
Justification for qualification based on EPPO PM 4 Standards
Justification for disqualification
Additional or non-conclusive information
Standard text



NAME OF THE ORGANISM: Comstockaspis perniciosa {Quadraspidiotus perniciosus} (QUADPE)


GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE PEST

Name as submitted in the project specification (if different):
 

Pest category:
 
Insecta


1- Identity of the pest/Level of taxonomic listing:

Is the organism clearly a single taxonomic entity and can it be adequately distinguished from other entities of the same rank?
 
Yes

Is the pest defined at the species level or lower?:
 
Yes

Can listing of the pest at a taxonomic level higher than species be supported by scientific reasons or can species be identified within the taxonomic rank which are the (main) pests of concern?
 
  • Not relevant: Fruits (including hops) sector
If necessary, please list the species:
 
-

Is it justified that the pest is listed at a taxonomic rank below species level?
 
Not relevant

Conclusion:
 
  • Candidate: Fruits (including hops) sector
Justification (if necessary):
 

2 – Status in the EU:
 
Is this pest already a quarantine pest for the whole EU?
 
No

Presence in the EU:
 
Yes

List of countries (EPPO Global Database):
 
Austria (1993); Bulgaria (2011); Croatia (2016); Czech Republic (2011); France (2011); Germany (2011); Greece (2008); Hungary (2013); Italy (2011); Italy/Sardegna (2011); Portugal (2011); Portugal/Azores (2011); Portugal/Madeira (2011); Romania (2011); Slovakia (2011); Slovenia (2013); Spain (2016); Spain/Islas Canárias (2011)

Conclusion:
 

Justification (if necessary):
 
Data of the presence of this pest on the EU territory are available in EPPO Global Database (https://gd.eppo.int/).

HOST PLANT N°1: Juglans regia (IUGRE) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
In the responses to the questionnaire CZ and FR did not support regulation because economic impact was considered acceptable. FR also commented that the 'pest was totally endemic in orchards', and 'no feasible and effective measures were available'. A full assessment is performed.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

 
Justification:
 
Comstockaspis perniciosa, San Jose scale, is a polyphagous species (see García Morales et al., 2016). The host plant range could probably be much wider, but on some of the recorded host plants this insect cannot finish development, which means that these plant species are not true host plants. The importance of the host plant is different in different parts of the world, so for each region only the local literature sources can give a true picture. In general, this species is a serious pest on deciduous fruit trees including apple, pear, peach, plum, currants and some woody ornamental plants (Konstantinova, 1976; Davidson & Miller, 1990; Kozar, 1990; Kosztarab, 1996; cited in CABI, 2021). Different varieties of fruit species show different susceptibility in different parts of the world (Bichina & Gatina, 1976; Shalamberidze, 1978; Verma & Sriravasta, 1990; cited in in CABI, 2021). The scale insect is a pest in walnut (UC PMG, 2020).
Comstockaspis perniciosa has 1-5 generations in different parts of the world. Its development differs in these regions and detailed information can be found only in local publications. It overwinters in colder countries as first-instar larvae (crawler). In central Europe, the adults appear at the end of April, and in northern Europe 1 or 2 months later. The crawlers continue to appear for 1-2 months: the females have about 100 crawlers (Kosztarab & Kozar, 1988). The first-instar larva is the dispersal phase. It can be distributed by wind, birds or flying insects (Mague & Reissig, 1983; CAB 2021).
The most important means of transport into a new area, however, is infested nursery material. By this means the pest was accidentally introduced throughout the world (CABI, 2021)
[In responses to the questionnaire, FR commented that 'the pest was totally endemic in production orchards'.]
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest was already widespread in orchards in the EU and that consequently plants for planting should not be considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal of the first instar larva.

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Infested walnut trees look water stressed, and fruiting wood encrusted with scale insects may die back. The infested bark often cracks and dies, and heavily-infested scaffold limbs and branches die within 1 to 2 years (UC PMG, 2020).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Minor

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
Yes

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 
No

Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest is managed by non-targeted controls (e.g. use of mineral oils) as used in classical approaches of orchards integrated pest management (see Golan et al., 2023). Plants in a nursery are regularly checked and a substantially free from requirement for all quality pests is considered enough.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
Monitoring program.
Use of insecticides.
Biocontrol.

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: plants for planting is not considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • Baker G (1977) Distribution of San Jose scale, Quadraspidiotus perniciosus (Comst.), in the Adelaide Hills. Agricultural Record 4(7), 54-56..
  • Bichina TI & Gatina Esh (1976) Varietal susceptibility of apple trees to San Jose scale and its integrated control. Ustoichivost' Vinograda i Plodov. Kul'tur k Zabolevaniyam i Vreditelyam, 124-137. Stiinca, Kishinev: Moldavian SSR.
  • CABI (2021) Diaspidiotus perniciosus (San José scale). CABI Digital Library (Accessed 31/Jul/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.46224.
  • Davidson JA & Miller DR (1990) Ornamental plants. In Armoured Scale Insects, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 603-632.
  • García Morales M, Denno BD, Miller DR, Miller GL, Ben-Dov Y, Hardy NB. 2016. ScaleNet: A literature-based model of scale insect biology and systematics. Database. The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation, 2016: bav118. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bav118. https://scalenet.info/catalogue/.
  • Golan K, Kot I, Kmiec K & Gorska-Drabik (2023) Review. Approaches to Integrated Pest Management in Orchards: Comstockaspis perniciosa (Comstock) Case Study. Agriculture 13, 131.
  • Konstantinova GM (1976). Coccids - pests of apple. Zashchita Rastenii 12:49-50.
  • Kosztarab M & Kozár F (1988) Scale insects of Central Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 455 pp.
  • Kozár F (1990). Deciduous fruit trees. In Armored Scale Insects their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 593-602.
  • Kozár F & Drozdjak J (1988). Peculiarities in the distribution of scale-insects (Homoptera: Coccoidea) on deciduous fruit trees in Hungary. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 23(1-2), 187-210.
  • Kozár F & Konstantinova GM (1981). The scale insects (Homoptera: Coccoidea) of deciduous fruit orchards in some European countries. (Survey of scale insect (Homoptera: Coccoidea) infestations in European orchards No. III.). Acta Phytopathologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 16(1/2), 211-222.
  • Kozár F, Brown MW & Lightner G (1994). Spatial distribution of homopteran pests and beneficial insects in an orchard and its connection with ecological plant protection. Journal of Applied Entomology 117(5), 519-529.
  • Mague DL & Reissig WH (1983) Airborne dispersal of San Jose scale, Quadraspidiotus perniciosus (Comstock) (Homoptera: Diaspididae), crawlers infesting apple. Environmental Entomology 12, 692-696.
  • Verma RR & Srivastava PM (1990) Response of different varieties of apple (Malus pumila) to pest infestation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 60(5), 338-339.
  • UC PMG (2020) San Jose scale. In Pest management guidelines for agriculture – Walnut. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, publication 3471, 38-39. https://ipm.ucanr.edu/legacy_assets/PDF/PMG/pmgwalnut.pdf

HOST PLANT N°2: Malus domestica (MABSD) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
New proposal

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Inspection for ' Quadraspidiotus perniciosus' recommended in EPPO Standard PM 4-27 Pathogen-tested material of Malus, Pyrus and Cydonia. However, in the responses to the questionnaire NL did not support regulation. FR commented for other hosts that the 'pest was totally endemic in orchards'. A full assessment is performed.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

 
Justification:
 
Comstockaspis perniciosa, San Jose scale, is a polyphagous species (see García Morales et al., 2016). The host plant range could probably be much wider, but on some of the recorded host plants this insect cannot finish development, which means that these plant species are not true host plants. The importance of the host plant is different in different parts of the world, so for each region only the local literature sources can give a true picture. In general, this species is a serious pest on deciduous fruit trees including apple, pear, peach, plum, currants and some woody ornamental plants (Konstantinova, 1976; Davidson & Miller, 1990; Kozar, 1990; Kosztarab, 1996; cited in CABI, 2021). Different varieties of fruit species show different susceptibility in different parts of the world (Bichina & Gatina, 1976; Shalamberidze, 1978; Verma & Sriravasta, 1990; cited in CABI, 2021). The scale insect can be a serious pest in apple (Sazo et al., 2008; Rodrigues et al., 2001; Golan, 2020).
Comstockaspis perniciosa has 1-5 generations in different parts of the world. Its development differs in these regions and detailed information can be found only in local publications. It overwinters in colder countries as first-instar larvae (crawler). In central Europe, the adults appear at the end of April, and in northern Europe 1 or 2 months later. The crawlers continue to appear for 1-2 months: the females have about 100 crawlers (Kosztarab & Kozar, 1988). The first-instar larva is the dispersal phase. It can be distributed by wind, birds or flying insects (Mague & Reissig, 1983; CABI 2021).
The most important means of transport into a new area, however, is infested nursery material. By this means the pest was accidentally introduced throughout the world (CABI, 2021)
[In responses to the questionnaire, FR commented that 'the pest was totally endemic in production orchards'.]
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest was already widespread in orchards in the EU and that consequently plants for planting should not be considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal of the first instar larva.

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
If heavy scale infestations are left unchecked, apple trees may be seriously damaged, resulting in reduced vigour, thin foliage, cracked or dying branches, and the eventual death of the tree. Young trees may be killed before fruiting. Infested fruit develop a reddish purple ring surrounding each spot where a scale settles (UC PRM, 2017).
In 2015 an outbreak of the San José scale was recorded mostly on fruits, notably on Malus in Poland. In 2016, major economic losses caused by the San José scale infestation were recorded in the orchards of the southeast of Poland. The study conducted in Poland during 2016–2018 near Opole Lubelskie reported that the San José scale has established very well outdoors (Golan, 2020).
Instar nymphs and females were observed on all surface parts of host plants from ground level to the tips of the shoots, leaves, and fruits. Infested fruit develops a reddish-purple ring surrounding each spot where a scale settles. Heavily infested fruit becomes distorted, pitted, cracked, and fall prematurely. Infested fruits become unmarketable causing greater economic losses. Severe infestation of fruit trees reduces the growth and decreases the yield (Łagowska 1995; Davidson & Miller 1990).
The layer of cambium of young, heavily infested twigs usually stains deep red-purplish in color. The sap accumulates in the reddened tissues of tree bark, resulting in swelling of the surface. The bark tissue often breaks, and rubbery spills appear near the cracks. The tree loses its vigour and dies prematurely. Uncontrolled infestation can kill young trees within 3 years of infestation (Westigard et al. 1977; Rosen 1990)

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Minor

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
Yes

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 
No

Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest is managed by non-targeted controls (e.g. use of mineral oils) as used in classical approaches of orchards integrated pest management (see Golan et al., 2023). Plants in a nursery are regularly checked and a substantially free from requirement for all quality pests is considered enough.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
Monitoring program.
Use of insecticides.
Biocontrol.

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: plants for planting is not considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No (new regulation proposal)

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
No listing.

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
No

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
No listing.


REFERENCES:
  • Bichina TI & Gatina Esh (1976) Varietal susceptibility of apple trees to San Jose scale and its integrated control. Ustoichivost' Vinograda i Plodov. Kul'tur k Zabolevaniyam i Vreditelyam, 124-137. Stiinca, Kishinev: Moldavian SSR.
  • CABI (2021) Diaspidiotus perniciosus (San José scale). CABI Digital Library (Accessed 31/Jul/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.46224.
  • Davidson JA & Miller DR (1990) Ornamental plants. In Armoured Scale Insects, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 603-632.
  • García Morales M, Denno BD, Miller DR, Miller GL, Ben-Dov Y, Hardy NB. 2016. ScaleNet: A literature-based model of scale insect biology and systematics. Database. The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation, 2016: bav118. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bav118. https://scalenet.info/catalogue/.
  • Golan K (2020) Contributions to the knowledge of the San José scale (Hemiptera, Coccomorpha, Diaspididae) in Poland. Polish Journal of Entomology 89(1), 7-19. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.0288
  • Ker KW & Sears MK (1986) Effectiveness of superior oil applied to apple for control of the San Jose scale, Quadraspidiotus perniciosus, and the European fruit scale, Quadraspidiotus ostrepformis (Homoptera: Diaspididae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario 117, 45-48.
  • Konstantinova GM (1976). Coccids - pests of apple. Zashchita Rastenii 12:49-50.
  • Kosztarab M & Kozár F (1988) Scale insects of Central Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 455 pp.
  • Kozár F (1990). Deciduous fruit trees. In Armored Scale Insects their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 593-602.
  • Łagowska B (1995) San José scale - serious quarantine pest. Ochrona Roślin 39(2), 8.
  • Mague DL & Reissig WH (1983) Airborne dispersal of San Jose scale, Quadraspidiotus perniciosus (Comstock) (Homoptera: Diaspididae), crawlers infesting apple. Environmental Entomology 12, 692-696.
  • Rodrigues AN, Torres LM & Polesny F (2001) Phenology of San José scale, Quadraspidiotus perniciosus (Comstock) on apple in Guarda region (central eastern Portugal). IOBC WPRS Bulletin 24(5), 195-200.
  • Rosen D (1990) Armored scale insects, their biology, natural enemies and control. Vol. A, Elselvier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 384 pp.
  • Sazo L, Araya & JE, Esparza S (2008) Control of San Jose scale nymphs, Diaspidiotus perniciosus (Comstock), on almond and apple orchards with pyriproxyfen, phenoxycarb, chlorpyrifos, and mineral oil. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 68(4), 412-412.
  • Shalamberidze NSh (1978). The resistance of plum cultivars to San Jose scale. Sadovodstvo, Vinogradarstvo i Vinodelie Moldavii, 4:41.
  • Verma RR & Srivastava PM (1990) Response of different varieties of apple (Malus pumila) to pest infestation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 60(5), 338-339.
  • Westigard PH, Calvin LD. 1977. Sampling San José in a Pest Management Program on Pear in Southern Oregon. Journal of Economic Entomology 70: 138–140.
  • UC PMG (2017) San Jose scale. In Pest management guidelines for agriculture – Apple. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, publication 3432, pages 54-56

HOST PLANT N°3: Prunus armeniaca (PRNAR) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Inspection for 'Quadraspidiotus perniciosus' is recommended in EPPO Standard PM 4-30 Certification scheme for almond, apricot, peach and plum. However, in the responses to the questionnaire CZ and FR supported deregulation because economic impact was considered acceptable. FR also commented that the 'pest was totally endemic in orchards', and 'no feasible and effective measures were available'. A full assessment is performed.
Remark: the assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

 
Justification:
 
Comstockaspis perniciosa, San Jose scale, is a polyphagous species (see García Morales et al., 2016). The host plant range could probably be much wider, but on some of the recorded host plants this insect cannot finish development, which means that these plant species are not true host plants. The importance of the host plant is different in different parts of the world, so for each region only the local literature sources can give a true picture. In general, this species is a serious pest on deciduous fruit trees including apple, pear, peach, plum, currants and some woody ornamental plants (Konstantinova, 1976; Davidson & Miller, 1990; Kozar, 1990; Kosztarab, 1996; cited in CABI, 2021). Different varieties of fruit species show different susceptibility in different parts of the world (Bichina & Gatina, 1976; Shalamberidze, 1978; Verma & Sriravasta, 1990; cited in CABI, 2021). The scale insect can be a pest in apricot (Navrozidis et al., 1999)
Comstockaspis perniciosa has 1-5 generations in different parts of the world. Its development differs in these regions and detailed information can be found only in local publications. It overwinters in colder countries as first-instar larvae (crawler). In central Europe, the adults appear at the end of April, and in northern Europe 1 or 2 months later. The crawlers continue to appear for 1-2 months: the females have about 100 crawlers (Kosztarab and Kozar, 1988). The first-instar larva is the dispersal phase. It can be distributed by wind, birds or flying insects (Mague & Reissig, 1983; CAB 2021).
The most important means of transport into a new area, however, is infested nursery material. By this means the pest was accidentally introduced throughout the world (CABI, 2021)
[In responses to the questionnaire, FR commented that 'the pest was totally endemic in production orchards'.]
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest was already widespread in orchards in the EU and that consequently plants for planting should not be considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal of the first instar larva.

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
UC PRG (2017) does not specifically mention the effect of the San Jose scale in apricot.
With insecticides and natural parasitoids and predators, San José scale seems to be relatively under control (Navrozidis et al., 1999)

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Minimal

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
Yes

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 
No

Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest is managed by non-targeted controls (e.g. use of mineral oils) as used in classical approaches of orchards integrated pest management (see Golan et al., 2023). Plants in a nursery are regularly checked and a substantially free from requirement for all quality pests is considered enough.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
Monitoring program.
Use of insecticides.
Biocontrol.

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: plants for planting is not considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • Bichina TI & Gatina Esh (1976) Varietal susceptibility of apple trees to San Jose scale and its integrated control. Ustoichivost' Vinograda i Plodov. Kul'tur k Zabolevaniyam i Vreditelyam, 124-137. Stiinca, Kishinev: Moldavian SSR.
  • CABI (2021) Diaspidiotus perniciosus (San José scale). CABI Digital Library (Accessed 31/Jul/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.46224.
  • Davidson JA & Miller DR (1990) Ornamental plants. In Armoured Scale Insects, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 603-632.
  • García Morales M, Denno BD, Miller DR, Miller GL, Ben-Dov Y, Hardy NB. 2016. ScaleNet: A literature-based model of scale insect biology and systematics. Database. The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation, 2016: bav118. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bav118. https://scalenet.info/catalogue/.
  • Golan K, Kot I, Kmiec K & Gorska-Drabik (2023) Review. Approaches to Integrated Pest Management in Orchards: Comstockaspis perniciosa (Comstock) Case Study. Agriculture 13, 131.
  • Konstantinova GM (1976). Coccids - pests of apple. Zashchita Rastenii 12:49-50.
  • Kosztarab M (1996). Scale Insects of North Eastern North America: identification, biology, and distribution. Martinsville, USA: Virginia Museum of Natural History, 650 pp..
  • Kosztarab M & Kozár F (1988) Scale insects of Central Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 455 pp.
  • Mague DL & Reissig WH (1983) Airborne dispersal of San Jose scale, Quadraspidiotus perniciosus (Comstock) (Homoptera: Diaspididae), crawlers infesting apple. Environmental Entomology 12, 692-696.
  • Navrozidis EI, Zois ZD & Papadopoulou SH (1999). Biology and control of San Jose scale, Quadraspidiotus perniciosus (comstock) (Hemiptera, Diaspididae) on apricot trees in northern Greece. Acta Horticulturae 488, 695-698. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1999.488.115
  • Shalamberidze NSh (1978). The resistance of plum cultivars to San Jose scale. Sadovodstvo, Vinogradarstvo i Vinodelie Moldavii, 4:41.
  • Verma RR & Srivastava PM (1990) Response of different varieties of apple (Malus pumila) to pest infestation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 60(5), 338-339.
  • UC PMG (2017) Pest management guidelines for agriculture – Apricot. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, publication 3433, 116 pages. https://anrcatalog.ucanr.edu/Details.aspx?itemNo=3433.

HOST PLANT N°4: Prunus avium (PRNAV) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Inspection for 'Quadraspidiotus perniciosus' is recommended in EPPO Standard PM 4-29 Certification scheme for cherry. However, in the responses to the questionnaire CZ and FR supported deregulation because economic impact was considered acceptable. FR also commented that the 'pest was totally endemic in orchards', and 'no feasible and effective measures were available'. A full assessment is performed.
Remark: the assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

 
Justification:
 
Comstockaspis perniciosa, San Jose scale, is a polyphagous species (see García Morales et al., 2016). The host plant range could probably be much wider, but on some of the recorded host plants this insect cannot finish development, which means that these plant species are not true host plants. The importance of the host plant is different in different parts of the world, so for each region only the local literature sources can give a true picture. In general, this species is a serious pest on deciduous fruit trees including apple, pear, peach, plum, currants and some woody ornamental plants (Konstantinova, 1976; Davidson & Miller, 1990; Kozár, 1990; Kosztarab, 1996 in CABI, 2021). Different varieties of fruit species show different susceptibility in different parts of the world (Bichina & Gatina, 1976; Shalamberidze, 1978; Verma & Sriravasta, 1990 in CABI, 2021). The scale insect can be a pest in cherry (Jaloba et al., 2023).
Comstockaspis perniciosa has 1-5 generations in different parts of the world. Its development differs in these regions and detailed information can be found only in local publications. It overwinters in colder countries as first-instar larvae (crawler). In central Europe, the adults appear at the end of April, and in northern Europe 1 or 2 months later. The crawlers continue to appear for 1-2 months: the females have about 100 crawlers (Kosztarab and Kozar, 1988). The first-instar larva is the dispersal phase. It can be distributed by wind, birds or flying insects (Mague & Reissig, 1983; CAB 2021).
The most important means of transport into a new area, however, is infested nursery material. By this means the pest was accidentally introduced throughout the world (CABI, 2021)
[In responses to the questionnaire, FR commented that 'the pest was totally endemic in production orchards'.]
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest was already widespread in orchards in the EU and that consequently plants for planting should not be considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal of the first instar larva.

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Scales suck plant juices from twigs and limbs and inject a toxin, resulting in loss of tree vigour, growth, and productivity. They are found on wood with thin bark and fruit. A red halo is produced around a feeding site. Untreated infestations can kill a tree in 1 to 2 years (UC IPM, 2017).
In cherries San Jose scale is rarely a problem in most growing areas, although it could be an occasional pest in some areas (UC IPM, 2017).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Minimal

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
Yes

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 
No

Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest is managed by non-targeted controls (e.g. use of mineral oils) as used in classical approaches of orchards integrated pest management (see Golan et al., 2023). Plants in a nursery are regularly checked and a substantially free from requirement for all quality pests is considered enough.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
Monitoring program.
Use of insecticides.
Biocontrol.

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: plants for planting is not considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • Bichina TI & Gatina Esh (1976) Varietal susceptibility of apple trees to San Jose scale and its integrated control. Ustoichivost' Vinograda i Plodov. Kul'tur k Zabolevaniyam i Vreditelyam, 124-137. Stiinca, Kishinev: Moldavian SSR.
  • CABI (2021) Diaspidiotus perniciosus (San José scale). CABI Digital Library (Accessed 31/Jul/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.46224.
  • Davidson JA & Miller DR (1990) Ornamental plants. In Armoured Scale Insects, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 603-632.
  • García Morales M, Denno BD, Miller DR, Miller GL, Ben-Dov Y, Hardy NB (2016) ScaleNet: A literature-based model of scale insect biology and systematics. Database. The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation, 2016: bav118. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bav118. https://scalenet.info/catalogue/.
  • Golan K, Kot I, Kmiec K & Gorska-Drabik (2023) Review. Approaches to Integrated Pest Management in Orchards: Comstockaspis perniciosa (Comstock) Case Study. Agriculture 13, 131.
  • Jaloba D, Chiriloaie-Palade A, Lumînare CM & Ciontu VM(2023) Research regarding integrated pest management strategies in sweet cherry orchards in South-East Romania. Scientific Papers. Series B. Horticulture 67(1), 105-109
  • Konstantinova GM (1976). Coccids - pests of apple. Zashchita Rastenii 12:49-50.
  • Kosztarab M (1996). Scale Insects of North Eastern North America: identification, biology, and distribution. Martinsville, USA: Virginia Museum of Natural History, 650 pp..
  • Kosztarab M & Kozár F (1988) Scale insects of Central Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 455 pp.
  • Kozár F (1990). Deciduous fruit trees. In Armored Scale Insects their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 593-602.
  • Mague DL & Reissig WH (1983) Airborne dispersal of San Jose scale, Quadraspidiotus perniciosus (Comstock) (Homoptera: Diaspididae), crawlers infesting apple. Environmental Entomology 12, 692-696.
  • Shalamberidze NSh (1978). The resistance of plum cultivars to San Jose scale. Sadovodstvo, Vinogradarstvo i Vinodelie Moldavii, 4:41.
  • Verma RR & Srivastava PM (1990) Response of different varieties of apple (Malus pumila) to pest infestation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 60(5), 338-339.
  • UC IPM (2017) San Jose scale. In Pest management guidelines for agriculture – Cherry. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, publication 3440, pages 45-46. https://anrcatalog.ucanr.edu/Details.aspx?itemNo=3440

HOST PLANT N°5: Prunus cerasus (PRNCE) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Inspection for 'Quadraspidiotus perniciosus' is recommended in EPPO Standard PM 4-29 Certification scheme for cherry. However, in the responses to the questionnaire CZ and FR supported deregulation because economic impact was considered acceptable. FR also commented that the 'pest was totally endemic in orchards', and 'no feasible and effective measures were available'. A full assessment is performed.
Remark: the assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

 
Justification:
 
Comstockaspis perniciosa, San Jose scale, is a polyphagous species (see García Morales et al., 2016). The host plant range could probably be much wider, but on some of the recorded host plants this insect cannot finish development, which means that these plant species are not true host plants. The importance of the host plant is different in different parts of the world, so for each region only the local literature sources can give a true picture. In general, this species is a serious pest on deciduous fruit trees including apple, pear, peach, plum, currants and some woody ornamental plants (Konstantinova, 1976;Davidson & Miller, 1990; Kozar, 1990; Kosztarab, 1996; cited in CABI, 2021). Different varieties of fruit species show different susceptibility in different parts of the world (Bichina & Gatina, 1976; Shalamberidze, 1978; Verma & Sriravasta, 1990; cited in CABI, 2021). The scale insect is a pest in sour cherry (Prunus cerasus; Balazs & Jenser, 2004).
Comstockaspis perniciosa has 1-5 generations in different parts of the world. Its development differs in these regions and detailed information can be found only in local publications. It overwinters in colder countries as first-instar larvae (crawler). In central Europe, the adults appear at the end of April, and in northern Europe 1 or 2 months later. The crawlers continue to appear for 1-2 months: the females have about 100 crawlers (Kosztarab and Kozar, 1988). The first-instar larva is the dispersal phase. It can be distributed by wind, birds or flying insects (Mague & Reissig, 1983; CAB 2021).
The most important means of transport into a new area, however, is infested nursery material. By this means the pest was accidentally introduced throughout the world (CABI, 2021)
[In responses to the questionnaire, FR commented that 'the pest was totally endemic in production orchards'.]
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest was already widespread in orchards in the EU and that consequently plants for planting should not be considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal of the first instar larva.

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Mentioned as pest in sour cherry, but no specific details on impact. The number of the species and specimens of the parasitoids of San Jose scale can be relatively low in an orchard and so natural enemies are not capable to regulate their population density. Under favorable conditions the properties of sour-cherry varieties are not convenient for the San Jose scale. Consequently their population density remains low, therefore the use of the insecticides is not required. However if the population density of these pests increase above the economical threshold, the application of the insecticides become unavoidable. Because the so-called selective insecticides have no satisfactory effect against these pests, the use of the broad-spectrum insecticides is necessary. Since the latter insecticides damage the beneficial insects, the population density of the pest insect could increase (Balazs & Jenser, 2004).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Minimal

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
Yes

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 
No

Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest is managed by non-targeted controls (e.g. use of mineral oils) as used in classical approaches of orchards integrated pest management (see Golan et al., 2023). Plants in a nursery are regularly checked and a substantially free from requirement for all quality pests is considered enough.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
Monitoring program.
Use of insecticides.
Biocontrol.

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: plants for planting is not considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • Balazs K & Jenser G (2004) Significance of the parasitoids and predators in IPM of sour-cherry. IOBC WPRS Bulletin 27(5), 3-8.
  • Bichina TI & Gatina Esh (1976) Varietal susceptibility of apple trees to San Jose scale and its integrated control. Ustoichivost' Vinograda i Plodov. Kul'tur k Zabolevaniyam i Vreditelyam, 124-137. Stiinca, Kishinev: Moldavian SSR.
  • CABI (2021) Diaspidiotus perniciosus (San José scale). CABI Digital Library (Accessed 31/Jul/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.46224.
  • Davidson JA & Miller DR (1990) Ornamental plants. In Armoured Scale Insects, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 603-632.
  • García Morales M, Denno BD, Miller DR, Miller GL, Ben-Dov Y, Hardy NB (2016) ScaleNet: A literature-based model of scale insect biology and systematics. Database. The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation, 2016: bav118. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bav118. https://scalenet.info/catalogue/.
  • Golan K, Kot I, Kmiec K & Gorska-Drabik (2023) Review. Approaches to Integrated Pest Management in Orchards: Comstockaspis perniciosa (Comstock) Case Study. Agriculture 13, 131.
  • Konstantinova GM (1976) Coccids - pests of apple. Zashchita Rastenii 12:49-50.
  • Kosztarab M (1996) Scale Insects of North Eastern North America: identification, biology, and distribution. Martinsville, USA: Virginia Museum of Natural History, 650 pp..
  • Kosztarab M & Kozár F (1988) Scale insects of Central Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 455 pp.
  • Kozár F (1990) Deciduous fruit trees. In Armored Scale Insects their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 593-602.
  • Mague DL & Reissig WH (1983) Airborne dispersal of San Jose scale, Quadraspidiotus perniciosus (Comstock) (Homoptera: Diaspididae), crawlers infesting apple. Environmental Entomology 12, 692-696.
  • Shalamberidze NSh (1978) The resistance of plum cultivars to San Jose scale. Sadovodstvo, Vinogradarstvo i Vinodelie Moldavii, 4:41.
  • Verma RR & Srivastava PM (1990) Response of different varieties of apple (Malus pumila) to pest infestation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 60(5), 338-339

HOST PLANT N°6: Prunus domestica (PRNDO) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Inspection for 'Quadraspidiotus perniciosus' is recommended in EPPO Standard PM 4-30 Certification scheme for almond, apricot, peach and plum. However, in the responses to the questionnaire CZ and FR supported deregulation because economic impact was considered acceptable. FR also commented that the 'pest was totally endemic in orchards', and 'no feasible and effective measures were available'. A full assessment is performed.
Remark: the assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

 
Justification:
 
Comstockaspis perniciosa, San Jose scale, is a polyphagous species (see García Morales et al., 2016). The host plant range could probably be much wider, but on some of the recorded host plants this insect cannot finish development, which means that these plant species are not true host plants. The importance of the host plant is different in different parts of the world, so for each region only the local literature sources can give a true picture. In general, this species is a serious pest on deciduous fruit trees including apple, pear, peach, plum, currants and some woody ornamental plants (Konstantinova, 1976; Davidson & Miller, 1990; Kozar, 1990; Kosztarab, 1996; cited in CABI, 2021). Different varieties of fruit species show different susceptibility in different parts of the world (Bichina & Gatina, 1976; Shalamberidze, 1978; Verma & Sriravasta, 1990; cited in CABI, 2021). The scale insect is a pest in plum (Prunus domestica; UC IPM, 2017).
Comstockaspis perniciosa has 1-5 generations in different parts of the world. Its development differs in these regions and detailed information can be found only in local publications. It overwinters in colder countries as first-instar larvae (crawler). In central Europe, the adults appear at the end of April, and in northern Europe 1 or 2 months later. The crawlers continue to appear for 1-2 months: the females have about 100 crawlers (Kosztarab and Kozar, 1988). The first-instar larva is the dispersal phase. It can be distributed by wind, birds or flying insects (Mague & Reissig, 1983; CAB 2021).
The most important means of transport into a new area, however, is infested nursery material. By this means the pest was accidentally introduced throughout the world (CABI, 2021)
[In responses to the questionnaire, FR commented that 'the pest was totally endemic in production orchards'.]
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest was already widespread in orchards in the EU and that consequently plants for planting should not be considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal of the first instar larva.

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
San Jose scale can infest branches, shoots, leaves, and fruit. Adults and nymphs suck plant juices and cause considerable damage. They have been known to seriously weaken branches and main scaffold limbs, thus causing permanent injury to mature trees. Crawlers settling on fruit may cause fruit spotting (UC IPM, 2017). Trees may die and infestations are reported on fruits (http://ephytia.inra.fr/fr/C/23756/Prunier-d-Ente-Pou-de-San-Jose-Diaspidiotus-perniciosus).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Minor

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
Yes

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 
No

Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest is managed by non-targeted controls (e.g. use of mineral oils) as used in classical approaches of orchards integrated pest management (see Golan et al., 2023). Plants in a nursery are regularly checked and a substantially free from requirement for all quality pests is considered enough.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
Monitoring program.
Use of insecticides.
Biocontrol.

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: plants for planting is not considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • Bichina TI & Gatina Esh (1976) Varietal susceptibility of apple trees to San Jose scale and its integrated control. Ustoichivost' Vinograda i Plodov. Kul'tur k Zabolevaniyam i Vreditelyam, 124-137. Stiinca, Kishinev: Moldavian SSR.
  • CABI (2021) Diaspidiotus perniciosus (San José scale). CABI Digital Library (Accessed 31/Jul/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.46224.
  • Davidson JA & Miller DR (1990) Ornamental plants. In Armoured Scale Insects, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 603-632.
  • García Morales M, Denno BD, Miller DR, Miller GL, Ben-Dov Y, Hardy NB. 2016. ScaleNet: A literature-based model of scale insect biology and systematics. Database. The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation, 2016: bav118. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bav118. https://scalenet.info/catalogue/.
  • Golan K, Kot I, Kmiec K & Gorska-Drabik (2023) Review. Approaches to Integrated Pest Management in Orchards: Comstockaspis perniciosa (Comstock) Case Study. Agriculture 13, 131.
  • Konstantinova GM (1976). Coccids - pests of apple. Zashchita Rastenii 12:49-50.
  • Kosztarab M (1996). Scale Insects of North Eastern North America: identification, biology, and distribution. Martinsville, USA: Virginia Museum of Natural History, 650 pp..
  • Kosztarab M & Kozár F (1988) Scale insects of Central Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 455 pp.
  • Kozár F (1990). Deciduous fruit trees. In Armored Scale Insects their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 593-602.
  • Mague DL & Reissig WH (1983) Airborne dispersal of San Jose scale, Quadraspidiotus perniciosus (Comstock) (Homoptera: Diaspididae), crawlers infesting apple. Environmental Entomology 12, 692-696.
  • Shalamberidze NSh (1978). The resistance of plum cultivars to San Jose scale. Sadovodstvo, Vinogradarstvo i Vinodelie Moldavii, 4:41.
  • Verma RR & Srivastava PM (1990) Response of different varieties of apple (Malus pumila) to pest infestation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 60(5), 338-339.
  • UC IPM (2017) San Jose scale. In Pest management guidelines for agriculture – Plum. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, publication 3462, pages 45-46.

HOST PLANT N°7: Prunus dulcis (PRNDU) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Inspection for 'Quadraspidiotus perniciosus' is recommended in EPPO Standard PM 4-30 Certification scheme for almond, apricot, peach and plum. However, in the responses to the questionnaire CZ and FR supported deregulation because economic impact was considered acceptable. FR also commented that the 'pest was totally endemic in orchards', and 'no feasible and effective measures were available'. A full assessment is performed.
Remark: the assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

 
Justification:
 
Comstockaspis perniciosa, San Jose scale, is a polyphagous species (see García Morales et al., 2016). The host plant range could probably be much wider, but on some of the recorded host plants this insect cannot finish development, which means that these plant species are not true host plants. The importance of the host plant is different in different parts of the world, so for each region only the local literature sources can give a true picture. In general, this species is a serious pest on deciduous fruit trees including apple, pear, peach, plum, currants and some woody ornamental plants (Konstantinova, 1976; Davidson & Miller, 1990; Kozar, 1990; Kosztarab, 1996; cited in CABI, 2021). Different varieties of fruit species show different susceptibility in different parts of the world (Bichina & Gatina, 1976; Shalamberidze, 1978; Verma & Sriravasta, 1990; cited in in CABI, 2021). The scale insect can be a pest in almond (Prunus dulcis; Sazo Rodríguez et al., 2008; UC IPM, 2019).
Comstockaspis perniciosa has 1-5 generations in different parts of the world. Its development differs in these regions and detailed information can be found only in local publications. It overwinters in colder countries as first-instar larvae (crawler). In central Europe, the adults appear at the end of April, and in northern Europe 1 or 2 months later. The crawlers continue to appear for 1-2 months: the females have about 100 crawlers (Kosztarab and Kozar, 1988). The first-instar larva is the dispersal phase. It can be distributed by wind, birds or flying insects (Mague & Reissig, 1983; CAB 2021).
The most important means of transport into a new area, however, is infested nursery material. By this means the pest was accidentally introduced throughout the world (CABI, 2021)
[In responses to the questionnaire, FR commented that 'the pest was totally endemic in production orchards'.]
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest was already widespread in orchards in the EU and that consequently plants for planting should not be considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal of the first instar larva.

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Scales suck plant juices from twigs and limbs, and inject a toxin, resulting in loss of tree vigour, growth and productivity, and death of limbs. A red halo is produced around a feeding site on 1-year-old green wood.
Untreated infestations can kill fruit spurs and scaffold wood within 1 to 3 years (UC IPM, 2019).
No damage reported on almond fruits.

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Minimal

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
Yes

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 
No

Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest is managed by non-targeted controls (e.g. use of mineral oils) as used in classical approaches of orchards integrated pest management (see Golan et al., 2023). Plants in a nursery are regularly checked and a substantially free from requirement for all quality pests is considered enough.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
Monitoring program.
Use of insecticides.
Biocontrol.

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: plants for planting is not considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • Bichina TI & Gatina Esh (1976) Varietal susceptibility of apple trees to San Jose scale and its integrated control. Ustoichivost' Vinograda i Plodov. Kul'tur k Zabolevaniyam i Vreditelyam, 124-137. Stiinca, Kishinev: Moldavian SSR.
  • CABI (2021) Diaspidiotus perniciosus (San José scale). CABI Digital Library (Accessed 31/Jul/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.46224.
  • Davidson JA & Miller DR (1990) Ornamental plants. In Armoured Scale Insects, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 603-632.
  • García Morales M, Denno BD, Miller DR, Miller GL, Ben-Dov Y, Hardy NB. 2016. ScaleNet: A literature-based model of scale insect biology and systematics. Database. The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation, 2016: bav118. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bav118. https://scalenet.info/catalogue/.
  • Golan K, Kot I, Kmiec K & Gorska-Drabik (2023) Review. Approaches to Integrated Pest Management in Orchards: Comstockaspis perniciosa (Comstock) Case Study. Agriculture 13, 131.
  • Konstantinova GM (1976). Coccids - pests of apple. Zashchita Rastenii 12:49-50.
  • Kosztarab M (1996). Scale Insects of North Eastern North America: identification, biology, and distribution. Martinsville, USA: Virginia Museum of Natural History, 650 pp..
  • Kosztarab M & Kozár F (1988) Scale insects of Central Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 455 pp.
  • Kozár F (1990). Deciduous fruit trees. In Armored Scale Insects their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 593-602.
  • Mague DL & Reissig WH (1983) Airborne dispersal of San Jose scale, Quadraspidiotus perniciosus (Comstock) (Homoptera: Diaspididae), crawlers infesting apple. Environmental Entomology 12, 692-696.
  • Sazo L, Araya & JE, Esparza S (2008) Control of San Jose scale nymphs, Diaspidiotus perniciosus (Comstock), on almond and apple orchards with pyriproxyfen, phenoxycarb, chlorpyrifos, and mineral oil. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 68(4), 412-412.
  • Shalamberidze NSh (1978). The resistance of plum cultivars to San Jose scale. Sadovodstvo, Vinogradarstvo i Vinodelie Moldavii, 4:41.
  • Verma RR & Srivastava PM (1990) Response of different varieties of apple (Malus pumila) to pest infestation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 60(5), 338-339.
  • UC IPM (2019) San Jose scale. In Pest management guidelines for agriculture – Almond. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, publication 3431, pages 47-49. https://ipm.ucanr.edu/legacy_assets/PDF/PMG/pmgalmond.pdf

HOST PLANT N°8: Prunus persica (PRNPS) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Inspection for 'Quadraspidiotus perniciosus' is recommended in EPPO Standard PM 4-30 Certification scheme for almond, apricot, peach and plum. However, in the responses to the questionnaire CZ and FR supported deregulation because economic impact was considered acceptable. FR also commented that the 'pest was totally endemic in orchards', and 'no feasible and effective measures were available'. A full assessment is performed.
Remark: the assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

 
Justification:
 
Comstockaspis perniciosa, San Jose scale, is a polyphagous species (see García Morales et al., 2016). The host plant range could probably be much wider, but on some of the recorded host plants this insect cannot finish development, which means that these plant species are not true host plants. The importance of the host plant is different in different parts of the world, so for each region only the local literature sources can give a true picture. In general, this species is a serious pest on deciduous fruit trees including apple, pear, peach, plum, currants and some woody ornamental plants (Konstantinova, 1976; Davidson & Miller, 1990; Kozar, 1990; Kosztarab, 1996; cited in CABI, 2021). Different varieties of fruit species show different susceptibility in different parts of the world (Bichina & Gatina, 1976; Shalamberidze, 1978; Verma & Sriravasta, 1990; cited in CABI, 2021). The scale insect is a pest in peach (Prunus persica; UC IPM, 2017; Santos Martins et al., 2022).
Comstockaspis perniciosa has 1-5 generations in different parts of the world. Its development differs in these regions and detailed information can be found only in local publications. It overwinters in colder countries as first-instar larvae (crawler). In central Europe, the adults appear at the end of April, and in northern Europe 1 or 2 months later. The crawlers continue to appear for 1-2 months: the females have about 100 crawlers (Kosztarab and Kozar, 1988). The first-instar larva is the dispersal phase. It can be distributed by wind, birds or flying insects (Mague & Reissig, 1983; CAB 2021).
The most important means of transport into a new area, however, is infested nursery material. By this means the pest was accidentally introduced throughout the world (CABI, 2021)
[In responses to the questionnaire, FR commented that 'the pest was totally endemic in production orchards'.]
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest was already widespread in orchards in the EU and that consequently plants for planting should not be considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal of the first instar larva.

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
San Jose scales cause injury by feeding on twigs, branches, and fruit; they may also inject salivary toxins while feeding. Heavy populations on the bark can cause gumming and kill twigs, branches, and entire trees if left uncontrolled. A characteristic, red halo-like discoloration often forms around the insect on small twigs or infested fruit. Fruit with haloes will be culled because of its unsightly appearance (UC IPM, 2017).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Minor

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
Yes

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 
No

Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest is managed by non-targeted controls (e.g. use of mineral oils) as used in classical approaches of orchards integrated pest management (see Golan et al., 2023). Plants in a nursery are regularly checked and a substantially free from requirement for all quality pests is considered enough.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
Monitoring program.
Use of insecticides.
Biocontrol.

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: plants for planting is not considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • Bichina TI & Gatina Esh (1976) Varietal susceptibility of apple trees to San Jose scale and its integrated control. Ustoichivost' Vinograda i Plodov. Kul'tur k Zabolevaniyam i Vreditelyam, 124-137. Stiinca, Kishinev: Moldavian SSR.
  • CABI (2021) Diaspidiotus perniciosus (San José scale). CABI Digital Library (Accessed 31/Jul/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.46224.
  • Davidson JA & Miller DR (1990) Ornamental plants. In Armoured Scale Insects, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 603-632.
  • García Morales M, Denno BD, Miller DR, Miller GL, Ben-Dov Y, Hardy NB. 2016. ScaleNet: A literature-based model of scale insect biology and systematics. Database. The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation, 2016: bav118. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bav118. https://scalenet.info/catalogue/.
  • Golan K, Kot I, Kmiec K & Gorska-Drabik (2023) Review. Approaches to Integrated Pest Management in Orchards: Comstockaspis perniciosa (Comstock) Case Study. Agriculture 13, 131.
  • Konstantinova GM (1976). Coccids - pests of apple. Zashchita Rastenii 12:49-50.
  • Kosztarab M (1996). Scale Insects of North Eastern North America: identification, biology, and distribution. Martinsville, USA: Virginia Museum of Natural History, 650 pp..
  • Kosztarab M & Kozár F (1988) Scale insects of Central Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 455 pp.
  • Kozár F (1990). Deciduous fruit trees. In Armored Scale Insects their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 593-602.
  • Mague DL & Reissig WH (1983) Airborne dispersal of San Jose scale, Quadraspidiotus perniciosus (Comstock) (Homoptera: Diaspididae), crawlers infesting apple. Environmental Entomology 12, 692-696.
  • Santos Martins D dos, Wolff VRDS, Culik MP, Santos BCD, Fornazier MJ & Ventura JA (2022) Diversity, distribution and host plants of armored scale insects (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) in Espírito Santo, Brazil. Biota Neotropica 22, e20211248.
  • Shalamberidze NSh (1978). The resistance of plum cultivars to San Jose scale. Sadovodstvo, Vinogradarstvo i Vinodelie Moldavii, 4:41.
  • Verma RR & Srivastava PM (1990) Response of different varieties of apple (Malus pumila) to pest infestation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 60(5), 338-339.
  • UC IPM (2017) San Jose scale. In Pest management guidelines for agriculture – Peach. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, publication 3454, pages 47-49. https://ipm.ucanr.edu/agriculture/peach/san-jose-scale/#gsc.tab=0

HOST PLANT N°9: Prunus salicina (PRNSC) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Inspection for 'Quadraspidiotus perniciosus' is recommended in EPPO Standard PM 4-30 Certification scheme for almond, apricot, peach and plum. However, in the responses to the questionnaire CZ and FR supported deregulation because economic impact was considered acceptable. FR also commented that the 'pest was totally endemic in orchards', and 'no feasible and effective measures were available'. A full assessment is performed.
Remark: the assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

 
Justification:
 
Comstockaspis perniciosa, San Jose scale, is a polyphagous species (see García Morales et al., 2016). The host plant range could probably be much wider, but on some of the recorded host plants this insect cannot finish development, which means that these plant species are not true host plants. The importance of the host plant is different in different parts of the world, so for each region only the local literature sources can give a true picture. In general, this species is a serious pest on deciduous fruit trees including apple, pear, peach, plum, currants and some woody ornamental plants (Konstantinova, 1976; Davidson & Miller, 1990; Kozar, 1990; Kosztarab, 1996; cited in CABI, 2021). Different varieties of fruit species show different susceptibility in different parts of the world (Bichina & Gatina, 1976; Shalamberidze, 1978; Verma & Sriravasta, 1990 cited in CABI, 2021). The scale insect can be a pest in Japanese plum (Prunus salicina; e.g. Suh, 2020).
Comstockaspis perniciosa has 1-5 generations in different parts of the world. Its development differs in these regions and detailed information can be found only in local publications. It overwinters in colder countries as first-instar larvae (crawler). In central Europe, the adults appear at the end of April, and in northern Europe 1 or 2 months later. The crawlers continue to appear for 1-2 months: the females have about 100 crawlers (Kosztarab and Kozar, 1988). The first-instar larva is the dispersal phase. It can be distributed by wind, birds or flying insects (Mague & Reissig, 1983; CAB 2021).
The most important means of transport into a new area, however, is infested nursery material. By this means the pest was accidentally introduced throughout the world (CABI, 2021)
[In responses to the questionnaire, FR commented that 'the pest was totally endemic in production orchards'.]
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest was already widespread in orchards in the EU and that consequently plants for planting should not be considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal of the first instar larva.

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
No

Justification:
 
No specific information on impact.

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 
No

Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest is managed by non-targeted controls (e.g. use of mineral oils) as used in classical approaches of orchards integrated pest management (see Golan et al., 2023). Plants in a nursery are regularly checked and a substantially free from requirement for all quality pests is considered enough.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
Monitoring program.
Use of insecticides.
Biocontrol.

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: plants for planting is not considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • Bichina TI & Gatina Esh (1976) Varietal susceptibility of apple trees to San Jose scale and its integrated control. Ustoichivost' Vinograda i Plodov. Kul'tur k Zabolevaniyam i Vreditelyam, 124-137. Stiinca, Kishinev: Moldavian SSR.
  • CABI (2021) Diaspidiotus perniciosus (San José scale). CABI Digital Library (Accessed 31/Jul/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.46224.
  • Davidson JA & Miller DR (1990) Ornamental plants. In Armoured Scale Insects, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 603-632.
  • García Morales M, Denno BD, Miller DR, Miller GL, Ben-Dov Y, Hardy NB. 2016. ScaleNet: A literature-based model of scale insect biology and systematics. Database. The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation, 2016: bav118. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bav118. https://scalenet.info/catalogue/.
  • Golan K, Kot I, Kmiec K & Gorska-Drabik (2023) Review. Approaches to Integrated Pest Management in Orchards: Comstockaspis perniciosa (Comstock) Case Study. Agriculture 13, 131.
  • Konstantinova GM (1976) Coccids - pests of apple. Zashchita Rastenii 12:49-50.
  • Kosztarab M (1996) Scale Insects of North Eastern North America: identification, biology, and distribution. Martinsville, USA: Virginia Museum of Natural History, 650 pp..
  • Kosztarab M & Kozár F (1988) Scale insects of Central Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 455 pp.
  • Kozár F (1990) Deciduous fruit trees. In Armored Scale Insects their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 593-602.
  • Mague DL & Reissig WH (1983) Airborne dispersal of San Jose scale, Quadraspidiotus perniciosus (Comstock) (Homoptera: Diaspididae), crawlers infesting apple. Environmental Entomology 12, 692-696.
  • Shalamberidze NSh (1978) The resistance of plum cultivars to San Jose scale. Sadovodstvo, Vinogradarstvo i Vinodelie Moldavii, 4:41.
  • Suh SJ (2020) Host plant list of the scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha) in South Korea. Insecta Mundi. 26 pages.
  • Verma RR & Srivastava PM (1990) Response of different varieties of apple (Malus pumila) to pest infestation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 60(5), 338-339.

HOST PLANT N°10: Pyrus communis (PYUCO) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
New proposal

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Inspection for ' Quadraspidiotus perniciosus' recommended in EPPO Standard PM 4-27 Pathogen-tested material of Malus, Pyrus and Cydonia. However, in the responses to the questionnaire NL did not support regulation. FR commented for other hosts that the 'pest was totally endemic in orchards'. A full assessment is performed.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

 
Justification:
 
Comstockaspis perniciosa, San Jose scale, is a polyphagous species (see García Morales et al., 2016). The host plant range could probably be much wider, but on some of the recorded host plants this insect cannot finish development, which means that these plant species are not true host plants. The importance of the host plant is different in different parts of the world, so for each region only the local literature sources can give a true picture. In general, this species is a serious pest on deciduous fruit trees including apple, pear, peach, plum, currants and some woody ornamental plants (Konstantinova, 1976; Davidson & Miller, 1990; Kozar, 1990; Kosztarab, 1996; cited in CABI, 2021). Different varieties of fruit species show different susceptibility in different parts of the world (Bichina & Gatina, 1976; Shalamberidze, 1978; Verma & Sriravasta, 1990; cited in CABI, 2021). The scale insect can be a serious pest in pear (Pyrus sp.; Jian, 1996; UC IPM, 2017).
Comstockaspis perniciosa has 1-5 generations in different parts of the world. Its development differs in these regions and detailed information can be found only in local publications. It overwinters in colder countries as first-instar larvae (crawler). In central Europe, the adults appear at the end of April, and in northern Europe 1 or 2 months later. The crawlers continue to appear for 1-2 months: the females have about 100 crawlers (Kosztarab and Kozar, 1988). The first-instar larva is the dispersal phase. It can be distributed by wind, birds or flying insects (Mague & Reissig, 1983; CAB 2021).
The most important means of transport into a new area, however, is infested nursery material. By this means the pest was accidentally introduced throughout the world (CABI, 2021)
[In responses to the questionnaire, FR commented that 'the pest was totally endemic in production orchards'.]
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest was already widespread in orchards in the EU and that consequently plants for planting should not be considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal of the first instar larva.

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
San Jose scales cause injury by feeding on twigs, branches, and fruit. They may also inject a salivary toxin while feeding. Infested fruit and wood develop a reddish purple ring (halo) surrounding each spot where a scale settles. Fruit infested by San Jose scale is often bumpy; in extreme cases, pears may be severely misshapen and stunted. Presence of either the insect or red ring on fruit causes it to be culled from fresh-market shipments. Pears may also be rejected for cannery use because insect feeding often causes sunken areas that cannot be removed by peeling. Heavy population can cause gumming and kill twigs, branches, and entire tree if left uncontrolled. Young trees may be killed before fruiting (UC IPM, 2017).
In Oregon orchard: An infestation level of 1% infested spurs of pear in late April or 4% in July will result in harvest (late September) damage in excess of 2% infested fruit. This last value approximates the tolerable economic loss for San Jose scale on pears (Westigard & Calvin, 1977).
The fruit SEWG highlighted that these were extreme cases.

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Minor

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 
No

Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest is managed by non-targeted controls (e.g. use of mineral oils) as used in classical approaches of orchards integrated pest management (see Golan et al., 2023). Plants in a nursery are regularly checked and a substantially free from requirement for all quality pests is considered enough.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
Monitoring program.
Use of insecticides.
Biocontrol.

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: plants for planting is not considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No (new regulation proposal)

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
No listing.

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
No

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
No listing.


REFERENCES:
  • Bichina TI & Gatina Esh (1976) Varietal susceptibility of apple trees to San Jose scale and its integrated control. Ustoichivost' Vinograda i Plodov. Kul'tur k Zabolevaniyam i Vreditelyam, 124-137. Stiinca, Kishinev: Moldavian SSR.
  • CABI (2021) Diaspidiotus perniciosus (San José scale). CABI Digital Library (Accessed 31/Jul/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.46224.
  • Davidson JA & Miller DR (1990) Ornamental plants. In Armoured Scale Insects, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 603-632.
  • García Morales M, Denno BD, Miller DR, Miller GL, Ben-Dov Y, Hardy NB. 2016. ScaleNet: A literature-based model of scale insect biology and systematics. Database. The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation, 2016: bav118. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bav118. https://scalenet.info/catalogue/.
  • Golan K, Kot I, Kmiec K & Gorska-Drabik (2023) Review. Approaches to Integrated Pest Management in Orchards: Comstockaspis perniciosa (Comstock) Case Study. Agriculture 13, 131.
  • Jian H (1996) New record of fruit tree pest of Fujian - San Jose scale Quadraspidiotus perniciosus (Comstock) and its parasitoids. Journal of Fujian Agricultural University (China), 25(3).
  • Konstantinova GM (1976). Coccids - pests of apple. Zashchita Rastenii 12:49-50.
  • Kosztarab M (1996). Scale Insects of North Eastern North America: identification, biology, and distribution. Martinsville, USA: Virginia Museum of Natural History, 650 pp..
  • Kosztarab M & Kozár F (1988) Scale insects of Central Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 455 pp.
  • Kozár F (1990). Deciduous fruit trees. In Armored Scale Insects their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 593-602.
  • Mague DL & Reissig WH (1983) Airborne dispersal of San Jose scale, Quadraspidiotus perniciosus (Comstock) (Homoptera: Diaspididae), crawlers infesting apple. Environmental Entomology 12, 692-696.
  • Shalamberidze NSh (1978). The resistance of plum cultivars to San Jose scale. Sadovodstvo, Vinogradarstvo i Vinodelie Moldavii, 4:41.
  • Verma RR & Srivastava PM (1990) Response of different varieties of apple (Malus pumila) to pest infestation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 60(5), 338-339.
  • Westigard PH & Calvin LD. 1977. Sampling San José in a Pest Management Program on Pear in Southern Oregon. Journal of Economic Entomology 70: 138–140
  • UC IPM (2017) San Jose scale. In Pest management guidelines for agriculture – Pear. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, publication 3455, pages 66-67

HOST PLANT N°11: Ribes (1RIBG) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
In the responses to the questionnaire CZ and FR did not support regulation because economic impact was considered acceptable. FR also commented that the 'pest was totally endemic in orchards', and 'no feasible and effective measures were available'. A full assessment is performed.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

 
Justification:
 
Comstockaspis perniciosa, San Jose scale, is a polyphagous species (see García Morales et al., 2016). The host plant range could probably be much wider, but on some of the recorded host plants this insect cannot finish development, which means that these plant species are not true host plants. The importance of the host plant is different in different parts of the world, so for each region only the local literature sources can give a true picture. In general, this species is a serious pest on deciduous fruit trees including apple, pear, peach, plum, currants and some woody ornamental plants (Konstantinova, 1976; Davidson & Miller, 1990; Kozar, 1990; Kosztarab, 1996; cited in CABI, 2021). Different varieties of fruit species show different susceptibility in different parts of the world (Bichina & Gatina, 1976; Shalamberidze, 1978; Verma & Sriravasta, 1990; cited in CABI, 2021). The scale insect can be a pest in Ribes spp. (Popescu & Churkova, 2016; CEAS, 2024).
Comstockaspis perniciosa has 1-5 generations in different parts of the world. Its development differs in these regions and detailed information can be found only in local publications. It overwinters in colder countries as first-instar larvae (crawler). In central Europe, the adults appear at the end of April, and in northern Europe 1 or 2 months later. The crawlers continue to appear for 1-2 months: the females have about 100 crawlers (Kosztarab and Kozar, 1988). The first-instar larva is the dispersal phase. It can be distributed by wind, birds or flying insects (Mague & Reissig, 1983; CAB 2021).
The most important means of transport into a new area, however, is infested nursery material. By this means the pest was accidentally introduced throughout the world (CABI, 2021)
[In responses to the questionnaire, FR commented that 'the pest was totally endemic in production orchards'.]
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest was already widespread in orchards in the EU and that consequently plants for planting should not be considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal of the first instar larva.

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Large infestations of the San Jose scale can cause loss of vigour in currants (CEAS, 2024). However, the Fruit SEWG noted that few reports are available.

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Minimal

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
Yes

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 
No

Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
The Fruit SEWG considered that the pest is managed by non-targeted controls (e.g. use of mineral oils) as used in classical approaches of orchards integrated pest management (see Golan et al., 2023). Plants in a nursery are regularly checked and a substantially free from requirement for all quality pests is considered enough.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 
Monitoring program.
Use of insecticides.
Biocontrol.

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: plants for planting is not considered as a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • Bichina TI & Gatina Esh (1976) Varietal susceptibility of apple trees to San Jose scale and its integrated control. Ustoichivost' Vinograda i Plodov. Kul'tur k Zabolevaniyam i Vreditelyam, 124-137. Stiinca, Kishinev: Moldavian SSR.
  • CABI (2021) Diaspidiotus perniciosus (San José scale). CABI Digital Library (Accessed 31/Jul/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.46224.
  • CEAS (2024) Currant (Ribes), Plant Health Problems. The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station (Accessed 31/Jul/2024). https://portal.ct.gov/caes/plant-pest-handbook/pphc/currant-ribes.
  • Davidson JA & Miller DR (1990) Ornamental plants. In Armoured Scale Insects, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 603-632.
  • García Morales M, Denno BD, Miller DR, Miller GL, Ben-Dov Y, Hardy NB. 2016. ScaleNet: A literature-based model of scale insect biology and systematics. Database. The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation, 2016: bav118. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bav118. https://scalenet.info/catalogue/.
  • Golan K, Kot I, Kmiec K & Gorska-Drabik (2023) Review. Approaches to Integrated Pest Management in Orchards: Comstockaspis perniciosa (Comstock) Case Study. Agriculture 13, 131.
  • Konstantinova GM (1976). Coccids - pests of apple. Zashchita Rastenii 12:49-50.
  • Kosztarab M (1996). Scale Insects of North Eastern North America: identification, biology, and distribution. Martinsville, USA: Virginia Museum of Natural History, 650 pp..
  • Kosztarab M & Kozár F (1988) Scale insects of Central Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 455 pp.
  • Kozár F (1990). Deciduous fruit trees. In Armored Scale Insects their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. 4B (ed. Rosen D). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 593-602.
  • Mague DL & Reissig WH (1983) Airborne dispersal of San Jose scale, Quadraspidiotus perniciosus (Comstock) (Homoptera: Diaspididae), crawlers infesting apple. Environmental Entomology 12, 692-696.
  • Popescu E & Churkova B (2016) Studies on the development and distribution of California Scale (Quadraspidiotus perniciosus Comstock) at blackcurrant. Journal of Mountain Agriculture on the Balkans 19(4) 144-151.
  • Shalamberidze NSh (1978). The resistance of plum cultivars to San Jose scale. Sadovodstvo, Vinogradarstvo i Vinodelie Moldavii, 4:41.
  • Verma RR & Srivastava PM (1990) Response of different varieties of apple (Malus pumila) to pest infestation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 60(5), 338-339