| Legend |
|---|
| Justification for qualification based on EPPO PM 4 Standards |
| Justification for disqualification |
| Additional or non-conclusive information |
| Standard text |
NAME OF THE ORGANISM: Neofabraea malicorticis (PEZIMA)
GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE PEST
Name as submitted in the project specification (if different):
Neofabraea malicorticis (Pezicula malicorticis)
Pest category:
Fungi
1- Identity of the pest/Level of taxonomic listing:
Is the organism clearly a single taxonomic entity and can it be adequately distinguished from other entities of the same rank?
Yes
Is the pest defined at the species level or lower?:
Yes
Can listing of the pest at a taxonomic level higher than species be supported by scientific reasons or can species be identified within the taxonomic rank which are the (main) pests of concern?
- Not relevant: Fruits (including hops) sector
If necessary, please list the species:
-
Is it justified that the pest is listed at a taxonomic rank below species level?
Not relevant
Conclusion:
- Candidate: Fruits (including hops) sector
Justification (if necessary):
-
2 – Status in the EU:
Is this pest already a quarantine pest for the whole EU?
No
Presence in the EU:
Yes
List of countries (EPPO Global Database):
Denmark (1992); Estonia (1992); Finland (2011); France (1992); Germany (1993); Ireland (1992); Italy (2016); Lithuania (1992); Netherlands (1992); Poland (1992); Sweden (1992)
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification (if necessary):
Data of the presence of this pest on the EU territory are available in EPPO Global Database (https://gd.eppo.int/).
HOST PLANT N°1: Cydonia oblonga (CYDOB) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.
Origin of the listing:
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072
Plants for planting:
Plants intended for planting
3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
Yes
Conclusion:
Evaluation continues
Justification (if necessary):
Inspection for 'Pezicula malicorticis' recommended in EPPO Standard PM 4-27 Pathogen-tested material of Malus, Pyrus and Cydonia. However, when responding to the questionnaire, NL supported deregulation because of pathway. Evaluation continues on this criteria.
4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
No
Conclusion:
Not candidate
Justification:
The disease is mostly reported from pome fruits, where it is one of the species involved in bull’s eye rot (post-harvest disease) (e.g. Cameldi et al., 2016). It is polyphagous on Rosaceae, important hosts are Malus sp. and Pyrus sp. (Ellis, 2001-2024). The Neofabraea complex includes Malus spp., quince (Cydonia oblonga), flowering quince (Chaenomeles japonica), peach (Prunus persica), serviceberry (Amelanchier pallida), apricot (P. armeniaca), plum (Prunus spp.), cherry (P. avium L.), hawthorn (Crataegus spp.), and mountain ash (Sorbus spp.) (Creemers, 2014; Kienholz, 1939; Verkley, 1999). The occurrence of N. malicorticis is associated with the disease symptoms on the west coast of the USA and Canada, and occasionally in Europe: Denmark, the Netherlands and Portugal (Verkley, 1999; cited in Köhl et al., 2018).
N. malicorticis causes anthracnose canker on apple trees and is found principally in more humid areas. It is an aggressive pathogen able to infect sound wood directly. The fungus survives as mycelium and conidia in branch cankers. Neofabraea species have also been reported to overwinter in mummified fruits, or in/on pruned wood, leaf litter, and on grass around the orchard (Köhl et al. 2018). New cankers appear in the autumn and reach full size in the spring. Acervuli first appear during late summer and autumn, about a year after infection. The cankers do not expand after the first year, but the anthracnose fungus can sporulate on dead bark for several years. Sporulation takes place during cool, moist weather. Conidia are exuded in a gelatinous matrix and dispersed by rain splashing. The sexual stage of the fungus is insignificant in the epidemiology of the disease (Creemers, 2017).
Sanitation is extremely important when trying to control apple anthracnose canker. All cankers should be pruned out and removed during winter pruning. Any new cankers that develop on limbs and trunks should also be pruned out as soon as they are discovered and removed from the orchard. Developing cankers often girdle 1-year-old wood. Therefore, any shoots that wilt or die suddenly should be removed as soon as they appear. Nursery trees should be examined carefully for symptoms of the disease at planting and again the following spring. Trees with cankers should be discarded (Creemers, 2017).
[In responses to the questionnaire, NL commented that the pest is 'airborne and widespread in nature'.]
The fruit SEWG considered that the pest was widespread in/around orchards and that plants for planting should not be considered as a significant pathway compared to natural spread.
N. malicorticis causes anthracnose canker on apple trees and is found principally in more humid areas. It is an aggressive pathogen able to infect sound wood directly. The fungus survives as mycelium and conidia in branch cankers. Neofabraea species have also been reported to overwinter in mummified fruits, or in/on pruned wood, leaf litter, and on grass around the orchard (Köhl et al. 2018). New cankers appear in the autumn and reach full size in the spring. Acervuli first appear during late summer and autumn, about a year after infection. The cankers do not expand after the first year, but the anthracnose fungus can sporulate on dead bark for several years. Sporulation takes place during cool, moist weather. Conidia are exuded in a gelatinous matrix and dispersed by rain splashing. The sexual stage of the fungus is insignificant in the epidemiology of the disease (Creemers, 2017).
Sanitation is extremely important when trying to control apple anthracnose canker. All cankers should be pruned out and removed during winter pruning. Any new cankers that develop on limbs and trunks should also be pruned out as soon as they are discovered and removed from the orchard. Developing cankers often girdle 1-year-old wood. Therefore, any shoots that wilt or die suddenly should be removed as soon as they appear. Nursery trees should be examined carefully for symptoms of the disease at planting and again the following spring. Trees with cankers should be discarded (Creemers, 2017).
[In responses to the questionnaire, NL commented that the pest is 'airborne and widespread in nature'.]
The fruit SEWG considered that the pest was widespread in/around orchards and that plants for planting should not be considered as a significant pathway compared to natural spread.
5 - Economic impact:
Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
Justification:
No data on quince.
In responses to the questionnaire, NL commented that infection during pruning was only causing damage on weak plants.
In responses to the questionnaire, NL commented that infection during pruning was only causing damage on weak plants.
What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
Conclusion:
Justification:
6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
Conclusion:
Justification:
7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
Conclusion:
Justification:
CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
Disqualified: plants for planting is not considered to be a significant pathway compared to others.
8 - Tolerance level:
Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
Yes
Proposed Tolerance levels:
Delisting
9 - Risk management measures:
Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
Yes
Proposed Risk management measure:
Delisting
REFERENCES:
- Cameldi I, Pirondi A, Neri F, Collina M & Mari M (2016). First report of apple bull’s eye rot caused by Neofabraea malicorticis in Italy. Plant Disease 100(12), 2532.
- Creemers P (2014) Anthracnose canker and perennial canker. In Compendium of Apple and Pear Diseases and Pests 2nd edition (eds Sutton TB, Aldwinckle HS, Agnello AM& Walgenbach JF). American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, MN, USA. pages 51-53.
- Ellis WN (2001-2024). Plant parasites of Europe: leafminers, galls and fungi. https://bladmineerders.nl/parasites/fungi/dikarya/ascomycota/pezizomycotina/leotiomycetes/leotiomycetidae/helotiales/dermateaceae/pezicula/pezicula-corticola/pezicula-malicorticis/ (accessed 16/Aug/2024).
- Gariepy TD, Rahe JE, Lévesque CA, Spotts RA, Sugar DL & Henriquez JL (2005). Neofabraea species associated with bull's-eye rot and cankers of apple and pear in the Pacific Northwest. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 27(1), 118-124.
- Kienholz JR (1939) Comparative study of the apple anthracnose and perennial canker fungi. Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 635-665.
- Köhl J, Wenneker M, Groenenboom-de Haas BH, Anbergen R, Goossen-van de Geijn HM, Lombaers-van der Plas CH, Pinto FAMF & Kastelein P (2018) Dynamics of post-harvest pathogens Neofabraea spp. and Cadophora spp. in plant residues in Dutch apple and pear orchards. Plant Pathology 67, 1264-1277.
- Verkley GJM, 1999. A monograph of Pezicula and its anamorphs. Studies in Mycology 44, 1–176.
HOST PLANT N°2: Malus (1MABG) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.
Origin of the listing:
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072
Plants for planting:
Plants intended for planting
3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
Yes
Conclusion:
Evaluation continues
Justification (if necessary):
Inspection for 'Pezicula malicorticis' recommended in EPPO Standard PM 4-27 Pathogen-tested material of Malus, Pyrus and Cydonia. However, when responding to the questionnaire, NL supported deregulation because of pathway. Evaluation continues on this criteria.
4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
No
Conclusion:
Not candidate
Justification:
The disease is mostly reported from pome fruits, where it is one of the species involved in bull’s eye rot (post-harvest disease) (e.g. Cameldi et al., 2016). It is polyphagous on Rosaceae, important hosts are Malus sp. and Pyrus sp. (Ellis, 2001-2024). The Neofabraea complex includes Malus spp., quince (Cydonia oblonga), pear (Pyrus spp.), flowering quince (Chaenomeles japonica), peach (Prunus persica), serviceberry (Amelanchier pallida), apricot (P. armeniaca), plum (Prunus spp.), cherry (P. avium L.), hawthorn (Crataegus spp.), and mountain ash (Sorbus spp.) (Creemers, 2014; Gariepy et al., 2005; Kienholz, 1939; Verkley, 1999). The occurrence of N. malicorticis is associated with the disease symptoms on the west coast of the USA and Canada, and occasionally in Europe: Denmark, the Netherlands, Portugal and Italy (Verkley, 1999; cited in Köhl et al., 2018, Cameldi et al., 2016).
The occurrence of N. malicorticis is associated with anthracnose canker and bull’s eye rot on the west coast of the USA and Canada, and occasionally in Europe: Denmark, the Netherlands, Portugal and Italy (Verkley, 1999, cited in Köhl et al., 2018; Cameldi et al., 2016).
N. malicorticis causes anthracnose canker on apple trees and is found principally in more humid areas. It is an aggressive pathogen able to infect sound wood directly. The fungus survives as mycelium and conidia in branch cankers. Neofabraea species have also been reported to overwinter in mummified fruits, or in/on pruned wood, leaf litter, and on grass around the orchard (Köhl et al. 2018). New cankers appear in the autumn and reach full size in the spring. Acervuli first appear during late summer and autumn, about a year after infection. The cankers do not expand after the first year, but the anthracnose fungus can sporulate on dead bark for several years. Sporulation takes place during cool, moist weather. Conidia are exuded in a gelatinous matrix and dispersed by rain splashing. The sexual stage of the fungus is insignificant in the epidemiology of the disease (Creemers, 2017).
Sanitation is extremely important when trying to control apple anthracnose canker and perennial canker. All cankers should be pruned out and removed during winter pruning. Any new cankers that develop on limbs and trunks should also be pruned out as soon as they are discovered and removed from the orchard. Developing cankers often girdle 1-year-old wood. Therefore, any shoots that wilt or die suddenly should be removed as soon as they appear. Nursery trees should be examined carefully for symptoms of the disease at planting and again the following spring. Trees with cankers should be discarded (Creemers, 2017).
[In responses to the questionnaire, NL commented that the pest is 'airborne and widespread in nature'.]
The fruit SEWG considered that the pest was widespread in/around orchards and that plants for planting should not be considered as a significant pathway compared to natural spread.
The occurrence of N. malicorticis is associated with anthracnose canker and bull’s eye rot on the west coast of the USA and Canada, and occasionally in Europe: Denmark, the Netherlands, Portugal and Italy (Verkley, 1999, cited in Köhl et al., 2018; Cameldi et al., 2016).
N. malicorticis causes anthracnose canker on apple trees and is found principally in more humid areas. It is an aggressive pathogen able to infect sound wood directly. The fungus survives as mycelium and conidia in branch cankers. Neofabraea species have also been reported to overwinter in mummified fruits, or in/on pruned wood, leaf litter, and on grass around the orchard (Köhl et al. 2018). New cankers appear in the autumn and reach full size in the spring. Acervuli first appear during late summer and autumn, about a year after infection. The cankers do not expand after the first year, but the anthracnose fungus can sporulate on dead bark for several years. Sporulation takes place during cool, moist weather. Conidia are exuded in a gelatinous matrix and dispersed by rain splashing. The sexual stage of the fungus is insignificant in the epidemiology of the disease (Creemers, 2017).
Sanitation is extremely important when trying to control apple anthracnose canker and perennial canker. All cankers should be pruned out and removed during winter pruning. Any new cankers that develop on limbs and trunks should also be pruned out as soon as they are discovered and removed from the orchard. Developing cankers often girdle 1-year-old wood. Therefore, any shoots that wilt or die suddenly should be removed as soon as they appear. Nursery trees should be examined carefully for symptoms of the disease at planting and again the following spring. Trees with cankers should be discarded (Creemers, 2017).
[In responses to the questionnaire, NL commented that the pest is 'airborne and widespread in nature'.]
The fruit SEWG considered that the pest was widespread in/around orchards and that plants for planting should not be considered as a significant pathway compared to natural spread.
5 - Economic impact:
Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
Justification:
Damage is mainly reported from the Pacific Northwest of the USA, where this fungus is the main cause of anthracnose of apple and bull’s eye rot (post-harvest disease).
In responses to the questionnaire, NL commented that infection during pruning was only causing damage on weak plants.
In responses to the questionnaire, NL commented that infection during pruning was only causing damage on weak plants.
What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
Conclusion:
Justification:
6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
Conclusion:
Justification:
7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
Conclusion:
Justification:
CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
Disqualified: plants for planting is not considered to be a significant pathway compared to others.
8 - Tolerance level:
Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
Yes
Proposed Tolerance levels:
Delisting
9 - Risk management measures:
Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
Yes
Proposed Risk management measure:
Delisting
REFERENCES:
- Cameldi I, Pirondi A, Neri F, Collina M & Mari M (2016). First report of apple bull’s eye rot caused by Neofabraea malicorticis in Italy. Plant Disease 100(12), 2532.
- Creemers P (2014) Anthracnose canker and perennial canker. In Compendium of Apple and Pear Diseases and Pests 2nd edition (eds Sutton TB, Aldwinckle HS, Agnello AM& Walgenbach JF). American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, MN, USA. pages 51-53.
- Ellis WN (2001-2024). Plant parasites of Europe: leafminers, galls and fungi. https://bladmineerders.nl/parasites/fungi/dikarya/ascomycota/pezizomycotina/leotiomycetes/leotiomycetidae/helotiales/dermateaceae/pezicula/pezicula-corticola/pezicula-malicorticis/ (accessed 16/Aug/2024).
- Gariepy TD, Rahe JE, Lévesque CA, Spotts RA, Sugar DL & Henriquez JL (2005). Neofabraea species associated with bull's-eye rot and cankers of apple and pear in the Pacific Northwest. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 27(1), 118-124.
- Kienholz JR (1939) Comparative study of the apple anthracnose and perennial canker fungi. Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 635-665.
- Köhl J, Wenneker M, Groenenboom-de Haas BH, Anbergen R, Goossen-van de Geijn HM, Lombaers-van der Plas CH, Pinto FAMF & Kastelein P (2018) Dynamics of post-harvest pathogens Neofabraea spp. and Cadophora spp. in plant residues in Dutch apple and pear orchards. Plant Pathology 67, 1264-1277.
- Verkley GJM, 1999. A monograph of Pezicula and its anamorphs. Studies in Mycology 44, 1–176.
