Regulated Non-Quarantine Projects

Two EU funded projects for the benefit of the whole EPPO region

Legend
Justification for qualification based on EPPO PM 4 Standards
Justification for disqualification
Additional or non-conclusive information
Standard text



NAME OF THE ORGANISM: Meloidogyne javanica (MELGJA)


GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE PEST

Name as submitted in the project specification (if different):
 

Pest category:
 
Nematoda


1- Identity of the pest/Level of taxonomic listing:

Is the organism clearly a single taxonomic entity and can it be adequately distinguished from other entities of the same rank?
 
Yes

Is the pest defined at the species level or lower?:
 
Yes

Can listing of the pest at a taxonomic level higher than species be supported by scientific reasons or can species be identified within the taxonomic rank which are the (main) pests of concern?
 
  • Not relevant: Fruits (including hops) sector
If necessary, please list the species:
 
-

Is it justified that the pest is listed at a taxonomic rank below species level?
 
Not relevant

Conclusion:
 
  • Candidate: Fruits (including hops) sector
Justification (if necessary):
 
The integration of molecular and isozyme electrophoretic pattern techniques with classical morphological approaches help to provide tools for differentiating Meloidogyne species and significantly improve and facilitate the routine identification of these nematodes (Archidona-Yuste et al., 2018). Some references for identification via morphological characteristics, isozyme electrophoresis and molecular methods are available in EPPO Standard PM 7/103 Diagnostic protocol for Meloidogyne enterolobii.

2 – Status in the EU:
 
Is this pest already a quarantine pest for the whole EU?
 
No

Presence in the EU:
 
Yes

List of countries (EPPO Global Database):
 
-

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification (if necessary):
 
Meloidogyne javanica is, amongst other countries, reported in Bulgaria (Samaliev et al., 2018), Cyprus (Philis, 1983), France (Terlidou, 1974), Germany (CABI, 2021), Greece (Tzortzakakis et al., 2011, Gonçalves et al., 2020), Hungary (CABI, 2021), Italy (Candido et al., 2005), Poland (CABI, 2021), Portugal (Maleita et al., 2022), Spain (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024)

HOST PLANT N°1: Cydonia oblonga (CYDOB) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
M. incognita is only mentioned in PM4/017(3) olive trees and rootstocks, not in the PM4 certification schemes available for all Prunus spp. and pome fruits. These schemes post-date the first mentioning of M. javanica in Europe. However, these certification schemes require that nuclear stock is produced in sterilized growing medium

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

 
Justification:
 
Main transmission mode - in addition to plants for planting - is soil (EPPO, 2022; PM4/017)
Meloidogyne arenaria, M. javanica and M. incognita are the most common species in warmer conditions of southern Europe, but also in glasshouses in northern Europe (Wesemael et al., 2011) e.g. Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica are the most predominant root-knot nematodes in Spain. Meloidogyne arenaria and M. javanica were positively associated with sandy texture (e.g. soil) (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Goodey et al. (1965) list a total of 770 host species or varieties for Meloidogyne javanica, including many weeds as well as crop plants. In addition to those crops in the list of hosts, there are many others of economic importance, including tea, grapevine, many vegetables, fruit trees, cereals and ornamentals (cited from CABI, 2021).
Eggs and juveniles can be transported with soil, so anything which has soil attached is a potential pathway including agricultural equipment and containers, tools, vehicle tires, and workers clothing or boots (CABI, 2021). The nematodes can also be transported by water; down river flooded fields can become infected (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Meloidogyne spp. are not transmitted with seeds (in Wesemael et al., 2011).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
No

Justification:
 
Although Meloidogyne is considered worldwide as the most important genus of plant-parasitic nematodes, information in the scientific literature on the economic impact of root-knot nematodes in Europe is scarce (Wesemael et al., 2011).
In Mediterranean and warm temperate climates, the perennial crops most affected by root-knot nematode species include Prunus spp. and, to a lesser extent, fig (Ficus carica) (Saucet et al., 2016).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

Justification:
 

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: there are no evidence of economic impact in the EU on this host plant.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2021). Meloidogyne incognita (root-knot nematode) (accessed 2/May/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.33245
  • Candido V, Miccolis V, Basile M, D Addabbo T & Gatta G (2005). Soil solarization for the control of Meloidogyne javanica on eggplant in Southern Italy. Acta horticulturae, 698, 195-200.
  • Clavero-Camacho I, Archidona-Yuste A, Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C, Castillo P & Palomares-Rius JE (2024) Prevalence and ecological factors affecting the distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in Prunus groves in Spain Journal of Integrative Agriculture 23(2), 566–589.
  • Duval H, Van Ghelder C, Portier U, Confolent C, Meza P & Esmenjaud D (2019). New Data Completing the Spectrum of the Ma, RMia, and RMja Genes for Resistance to Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Prunus. Phytopathology 109(4):615-622. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-05-18-0173-R
  • EPPO (2022) PM 4/17 (3) Certification scheme for olive trees and rootstocks. EPPO Bulletin 52, 590–60. DOI: 10.1111/epp.1288
  • Gonçalves AR, Conceição IL, Kormpi M & Tzortzakakis EA (2020). Lavandula angustifolia and Oxalis pes-caprae, hosts of Meloidogyne hapla and Meloidogyne javanica - A note for Meloidogyne luci in Greece. Hellenic Plant Protection Journal 13(2), 78-82. https://sciendo.com/pl/article/10.2478/hppj-2020-0008?content-tab=abstract.
  • Goodey JB, Franklin MT, Hooper DJ (1965). T. Goodey's the nematode parasites of plants catalogued under their hosts. 3rd. ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
  • Maleita C, Santos D, Abrantes I & Esteves I (2022). First report of root knot nematodes Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica parasitizing sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas, in Portugal. Plant Disease 106(9), 2536.
  • Philis J, 1983. Occurrence of Meloidogyne spp. and races on the island of Cyprus. Nematologia Mediterranea 11(1), 13-19.
  • Samaliev HY, Salkova DS, Baycheva OTs, Zinovieva SV & Udalova ZhV (2018) Investigations of the root-knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne (Goeldi, 1887) on the territories of Bulgaria and Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Parasitology 12(4), 94–98. DOI: 10.31016/1998-8435-2018-12-4-94-9
  • Saucet SB, Van Ghelder C, Abad P, Duval H & Esmenjaud D9 (2016) Resistance to root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp. in woody plants. New Phytologist (2016) 211: 41–56. doi: 10.1111/nph.13933
  • Terlidou MC (1974). Effect of root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica (Treub) Chitwood in vine nurseries. Vitis, 12, 316-319.
  • Toth F, Bogdányi FT, Petrikovszki R, Gódor A, Zalai M, Balint B, Sunder P & Myrta, A. (2019). Control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita and weeds in protected cucumber with dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) over two crop cycles: The first results in Hungary. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 54(2), 267-278.
  • Wesemael W, Viaene N & Moens M. (2011). Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Europe. Nematology 13(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1163/138855410X526831

HOST PLANT N°2: Ficus carica (FIUCA) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
No PM4 for Ficus carica. Remark: M. incognita is only mentioned in PM4/017(3) olive trees and rootstocks, not in the PM4 certification schemes available for all Prunus spp. and pome fruits. These schemes post-date the first mentioning of M. javanica in Europe. However, these certification schemes require that nuclear stock is produced in sterilized growing medium

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

 
Justification:
 
Main transmission mode - in addition to plants for planting - is soil (EPPO, 2022; PM4/017)
Meloidogyne arenaria, M. javanica and M. incognita are the most common species in warmer conditions of southern Europe, but also in glasshouses in northern Europe (Wesemael et al., 2011) e.g. Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica are the most predominant root-knot nematodes in Spain. Meloidogyne arenaria and M. javanica were positively associated with sandy texture (e.g. soil) (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Goodey et al. (1965) list a total of 770 host species or varieties for Meloidogyne javanica, including many weeds as well as crop plants. In addition to those crops in the list of hosts, there are many others of economic importance, including tea, grapevine, many vegetables, fruit trees, cereals and ornamentals (cited from CABI, 2021).
Eggs and juveniles can be transported with soil, so anything which has soil attached is a potential pathway including agricultural equipment and containers, tools, vehicle tires, and workers clothing or boots (CABI, 2021). The nematodes can also be transported by water; down river flooded fields can become infected (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Meloidogyne spp. are not transmitted with seeds (in Wesemael et al., 2011).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Although Meloidogyne is considered worldwide as the most important genus of plant-parasitic nematodes, information in the scientific literature on the economic impact of root-knot nematodes in Europe is scarce (Wesemael et al., 2011).
In Mediterranean and warm temperate climates, the perennial crops most affected by root-knot nematode species include Prunus spp. and, to a lesser extent fig (Ficus carica) (Saucet et al., 2016).
In fig trees, root-knot nematodes are reported to cause reduction in growth and yield. Heavily infected roots may die (CABI, 2022). In Spain, practical experience from the field shows that Meloidogyne species cause considerable damage in all areas where this fruit tree is grown. In Extremadura, the species M. arenaria has been identified. There is currently no authorised nematicide against these pathogenic nematodes, so they must be controlled by solarisation or biofumigation (Casadomet et al., 2015).
Meloidogyne is also considered as a yield- and production-limiting pest of fig in Brazil (Sherb, 1993). Species associated with this crop around the world include M. arenaria, M. javanica and M. incognita (McSorley 1981), the latter in higher frequency. The presence of this nematode in the crop also affected commercial production in the past in the United States i(Knight Jr 1980), France (Scotto La Massèse et al. 1984) and Brasil (Ferraz et al. 1982, Campos 1997), countries with the highest yields in the world (references in Perraza-Padilla et al., 2013).
These nematodes are also one of the limiting factors for the cultivation of fig in India where it caused considerable yield losses (Jagdev and Mhase, 2019). Jagdev and Mhase (2019) conducted a field experiment to assess the yield losses due to M. incognita in fig (cv. Poona). Their results indicated that the loss in yield of fig in untreated trees ranged from 16.57 to 31.60%.

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Medium

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
No

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
For Ficus carica no effective control strategy based on resistance has yet been implemented, although Ficus racemose seems to be highly resistant and is graft compatible (Saucet et al., 2016).

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Use of clean soil: The propagation material is kept either in containers of sterilized growing medium or in soil that has been tested and found free from Xiphinema diversicaudatum (see EPPO Standard PM4/35), Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita, M. javanica, Pratylenchus vulnus and Verticillium dahlia (EPPO 2022)

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Recommended for listing as an RNQP based on data.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
No

Proposed Risk management measure:
 

Justification (if necessary):
 
The Fruit SEWG discussed how visual examination should be performed in a nursery: although random inspection of the roots of asymptomatic plants for this nematode is better (i.e. uprooting some asymptomatic plants), some countries considered that it would have an unacceptable economic impact and recommended that root examination is only performed following suspicions.

REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2021) Meloidogyne incognita (root-knot nematode) (accessed 2/May/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.33245
  • CABI (2022) The Fig. Botany, production and uses. CAB International. ISBN-13:978 1 78924 289 8.
  • Candido V, Miccolis V, Basile M, D Addabbo T & Gatta G (2005). Soil solarization for the control of Meloidogyne javanica on eggplant in Southern Italy. Acta horticulturae, 698, 195-200.
  • Casadomet E, López Corrales M, Pérez Gragera F, Senero M, Pérez Ross J & Del Moral J (2015) Parásitos, patógenos y fisiopatías de la higuera. Phytoma, 271: 30-39.
  • Clavero-Camacho I, Archidona-Yuste A, Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C, Castillo P & Palomares-Rius JE (2024) Prevalence and ecological factors affecting the distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in Prunus groves in Spain Journal of Integrative Agriculture 23(2), 566–589.
  • Duval H, Van Ghelder C, Portier U, Confolent C, Meza P & Esmenjaud D (2019). New Data Completing the Spectrum of the Ma, RMia, and RMja Genes for Resistance to Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Prunus. Phytopathology 109(4):615-622. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-05-18-0173-R
  • EPPO (2022) PM 4/17 (3) Certification scheme for olive trees and rootstocks. EPPO Bulletin 52, 590–60. DOI: 10.1111/epp.1288
  • Gonçalves AR, Conceição IL, Kormpi M & Tzortzakakis EA (2020). Lavandula angustifolia and Oxalis pes-caprae, hosts of Meloidogyne hapla and Meloidogyne javanica - A note for Meloidogyne luci in Greece. Hellenic Plant Protection Journal 13(2), 78-82. https://sciendo.com/pl/article/10.2478/hppj-2020-0008?content-tab=abstract.
  • Goodey JB, Franklin MT, Hooper DJ (1965). T. Goodey's the nematode parasites of plants catalogued under their hosts. 3rd. ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
  • Jagdev GH, Mhase NL (2019) Assessment of avoidable yield losses due to root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita infesting fig under field conditions. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 7(6), 274-277.
  • Jones JT, Haegeman A, Danchin EGJ, Gaur HS, Helder J, Jones MGK, Kikuchi T, Manzanilla-López R, Palomares-Rius JE, Wesemael WML & Perry RN (2013) Top 10 plant-parasitic nematodes in molecular plant pathology. Molecular Plant Pathology 14 (9), 946-961.
  • Maleita C, Santos D, Abrantes I & Esteves I (2022). First report of root knot nematodes Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica parasitizing sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas, in Portugal. Plant Disease 106(9), 2536.
  • Perraza-Padilla W, Rosales-Flores J., Esquivel-Hernández A, Hilje-Rodríguez I, Molina-Bravo R & Castillo-Castillo P (2013).Identificación morfológica, morfométrica y molecular de Meloidogyne incógnita en higuera (Ficus carica L.) en Costa Rica. Agronomía Mesoamericana 24(2), 337-346.
  • Philis J, 1983. Occurrence of Meloidogyne spp. and races on the island of Cyprus. Nematologia Mediterranea 11(1), 13-19.
  • Samaliev HY, Salkova DS, Baycheva OTs, Zinovieva SV & Udalova ZhV (2018) Investigations of the root-knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne (Goeldi, 1887) on the territories of Bulgaria and Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Parasitology 12(4), 94–98. DOI: 10.31016/1998-8435-2018-12-4-94-9
  • Saucet SB, Van Ghelder C, Abad P, Duval H & Esmenjaud D9 (2016) Resistance to root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp. in woody plants. New Phytologist (2016) 211: 41–56. doi: 10.1111/nph.13933
  • Terlidou MC (1974). Effect of root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica (Treub) Chitwood in vine nurseries. Vitis, 12, 316-319.
  • Toth F, Bogdányi FT, Petrikovszki R, Gódor A, Zalai M, Balint B, Sunder P & Myrta, A. (2019). Control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita and weeds in protected cucumber with dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) over two crop cycles: The first results in Hungary. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 54(2), 267-278.
  • Wesemael W, Viaene N & Moens M. (2011). Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Europe. Nematology 13(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1163/138855410X526831

HOST PLANT N°3: Malus (1MABG) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
M. incognita is only mentioned in PM4/017(3) olive trees and rootstocks, not in the PM4 certification schemes available for all Prunus spp. and pome fruits. These schemes post-date the first mentioning of M. javanica in Europe. However, these certification schemes require that nuclear stock is produced in sterilized growing medium

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

 
Justification:
 
Main transmission mode - in addition to plants for planting - is soil (EPPO, 2022; PM4/017)
Meloidogyne arenaria, M. javanica and M. incognita are the most common species in warmer conditions of southern Europe, but also in glasshouses in northern Europe (Wesemael et al., 2011) e.g. Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica are the most predominant root-knot nematodes in Spain. Meloidogyne arenaria and M. javanica were positively associated with sandy texture (e.g. soil) (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Goodey et al. (1965) list a total of 770 host species or varieties for Meloidogyne javanica, including many weeds as well as crop plants. In addition to those crops in the list of hosts, there are many others of economic importance, including tea, grapevine, many vegetables, fruit trees, cereals and ornamentals (cited from CABI, 2021).
Eggs and juveniles can be transported with soil, so anything which has soil attached is a potential pathway including agricultural equipment and containers, tools, vehicle tires, and workers clothing or boots (CABI, 2021). The nematodes can also be transported by water; down river flooded fields can become infected (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Meloidogyne spp. are not transmitted with seeds (in Wesemael et al., 2011).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
No

Justification:
 
Although Meloidogyne is considered worldwide as the most important genus of plant-parasitic nematodes, information in the scientific literature on the economic impact of root-knot nematodes in Europe is scarce (Wesemael et al., 2011).
In Mediterranean and warm temperate climates, the perennial crops most affected by root-knot nematode species include Prunus spp. and, to a lesser extent, fig (Ficus carica) (Saucet et al., 2016).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

Justification:
 

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: there are no evidence of economic impact in the EU on this host plant.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2021). Meloidogyne incognita (root-knot nematode) (accessed 2/May/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.33245
  • Candido V, Miccolis V, Basile M, D Addabbo T & Gatta G (2005). Soil solarization for the control of Meloidogyne javanica on eggplant in Southern Italy. Acta horticulturae, 698, 195-200.
  • Clavero-Camacho I, Archidona-Yuste A, Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C, Castillo P & Palomares-Rius JE (2024) Prevalence and ecological factors affecting the distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in Prunus groves in Spain Journal of Integrative Agriculture 23(2), 566–589.
  • Duval H, Van Ghelder C, Portier U, Confolent C, Meza P & Esmenjaud D (2019). New Data Completing the Spectrum of the Ma, RMia, and RMja Genes for Resistance to Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Prunus. Phytopathology 109(4):615-622. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-05-18-0173-R
  • EPPO (2022) PM 4/17 (3) Certification scheme for olive trees and rootstocks. EPPO Bulletin 52, 590–60. DOI: 10.1111/epp.1288
  • Gonçalves AR, Conceição IL, Kormpi M & Tzortzakakis EA (2020). Lavandula angustifolia and Oxalis pes-caprae, hosts of Meloidogyne hapla and Meloidogyne javanica - A note for Meloidogyne luci in Greece. Hellenic Plant Protection Journal 13(2), 78-82. https://sciendo.com/pl/article/10.2478/hppj-2020-0008?content-tab=abstract.
  • Goodey JB, Franklin MT, Hooper DJ (1965). T. Goodey's the nematode parasites of plants catalogued under their hosts. 3rd. ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
  • Maleita C, Santos D, Abrantes I & Esteves I (2022). First report of root knot nematodes Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica parasitizing sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas, in Portugal. Plant Disease 106(9), 2536.
  • Philis J, 1983. Occurrence of Meloidogyne spp. and races on the island of Cyprus. Nematologia Mediterranea 11(1), 13-19.
  • Samaliev HY, Salkova DS, Baycheva OTs, Zinovieva SV & Udalova ZhV (2018) Investigations of the root-knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne (Goeldi, 1887) on the territories of Bulgaria and Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Parasitology 12(4), 94–98. DOI: 10.31016/1998-8435-2018-12-4-94-9
  • Saucet SB, Van Ghelder C, Abad P, Duval H & Esmenjaud D9 (2016) Resistance to root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp. in woody plants. New Phytologist (2016) 211: 41–56. doi: 10.1111/nph.13933
  • Terlidou MC (1974). Effect of root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica (Treub) Chitwood in vine nurseries. Vitis, 12, 316-319.
  • Toth F, Bogdányi FT, Petrikovszki R, Gódor A, Zalai M, Balint B, Sunder P & Myrta, A. (2019). Control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita and weeds in protected cucumber with dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) over two crop cycles: The first results in Hungary. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 54(2), 267-278.
  • Wesemael W, Viaene N & Moens M. (2011). Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Europe. Nematology 13(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1163/138855410X526831

HOST PLANT N°4: Olea europaea (OLVEU) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Qualified

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
EPPO Standard PM 4/17 Certification scheme for olive trees and rootstock recommends using sterilized growing medium or soil tested and found free from Meloidogyne javanica. Full assessment of the RNQP status of M. javanica, together with M. incognita, was performed in 2021/2022 in the context of the revision of EPPO Standard PM 4/17. The RNQP status was considered justified by olive certification experts.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

 
Justification:
 
The root knot nematode M. japonica is known to infect olive trees. Plant parasitic nematodes move only short distances and, thus their dissemination can occur via water, wind and human activities such as the introduction of infected planting material or diffusion of infested soil with nursery practices.
Hamza et al. (2017) and Nico et al. (2002) suggested that the use of infected rooted plantlets was one of the likely major sources of root-knot nematode inoculum in the field. In Spain, a study in olive nurseries reported a high-percentage of root-knot nematodes in infected plantlets [Meloidogyne incognita (14.7%), M. javanica (11.2%), and M. arenaria (2.7%)] (Nico et al., 2002).
These nematodes occur in sporadic distributions in established orchards. Notably, three major parameters drive the distribution of Meloidogyne spp. in cultivated olives: cover vegetation on alley, irrigation and soil texture; but different species respond differently to them. In particular the presence of M. incognita is highly correlated with sandy loamy soils, the presence of M. javanica with irrigated soils and cover vegetation, while the presence of M. arenaria is correlated with the absence of cover vegetation on alley and absence of irrigation. These parameters likely influence the selection of each particular Meloidogyne species from a major dispersal source, such as the rooted plantlets used to establish the orchards (Archidona-Yuste et al., 2018).
Different management measures allow to reduce the importance of other pathways than plants for planting such as the use of new pest-free production sites to establish the planting material, management via soil disinfestation with fumigants prior to planting, soil solarization, use of special amendments (biofumigation), establishment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant root systems (to protect plants against soilborne diseases through improvement of phosphorus (P) absorption), direct competition etc., the use of good practices to avoid moving soils between different production sites etc. (Castillo et al., 2010). Taking all these measures into consideration, plants for planting is considered to be a major pathway compared to others.

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
The root knot nematodes M. arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica are known to damage cultivated olive trees, especially in nurseries where optimum irrigation conditions favour root proliferation and increased nematode population, and which have been shown to be more susceptible than older plants (Castillo et al., 2010; Ali et al., 2014). Pathogenicity assays under controlled environmental conditions demonstrated the potential of M. arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica to damage olive rootstocks as well as self-rooted olive cultivars (Castillo et al., 2010). Meloidogyne sp. cause heavy root galling on olive trees, distorted feeder roots as well as plant growth retardation. At low infection levels, no disease symptoms are observed on the stems or leaves of nematode-infected planting stocks as compared with non-infected ones (Nico et al., 2002). On specific cultivars, e.g. Picual (one of the olive cultivars most extensively grown in the Mediterranean Basin), these nematodes can show a distinct yellowing affecting the uppermost leaves followed by partial defoliation (Castillo et al., 2010; Ali et al., 2014). Controlled experiments showed that root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne (e.g., M. arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica) may be responsible for 5 to 10% crop losses, while the damage is often difficult to assign to plant parasitic nematodes (Ali et al., 2014). Studies on the pathogenicity of Meloidogyne spp. to olives suggest that main stem diameter is a highly sensitive parameter for assessing damage caused by M. arenaria and M. javanica (Castillo et al., 2010).
In Argentina, the etiology of a generalized olive drying syndrome (designated “seca”) was attributed to a disease complex involving M. javanica and several species of the soilborne fungus Fusarium, although a causal relationship has not been established (Castillo et al., 2010).
Indirect root damages are also reported to be related to nematode infection, whose penetration opens pathways to other soilborne pathogens (bacteria, fungi). The best example is the association of plant pathogenic nematodes such as M. incognita with the fungal pathogen Verticillium dahliae (Verticillium wilt). The presence of nematodes enhances the symptoms induced by the fungus (Ali et al., 2014).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Medium in nurseries (but appears to be lower in orchards)

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
No

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Damage to established olive orchards by nematode parasitism may not be clearly perceived because olive is an extremely vigorous plant able to thrive in relatively dry areas, which may obscure expression of symptoms from nematode attacks. However, modern olive production is based largely on the establishment of new high-input orchards intended to increase yields while reducing the time for investment recovery. This model, broadly adopted in new olive-producing areas of the Southern Hemisphere and the Mediterranean Basin, creates an environment conducive to diseases caused by or involving nematodes (Ali et al., 2014). The economic importance of these nematodes in olive cultivation has also increased in recent years because most chemical agents for the control of plant-parasitic nematodes have been banned due to environmental and health concerns (Castillo et al., 2010).

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
The appropriate application of exclusion principles should lead to nematode-free nursery stock. Disinfestation of soil by any means cannot achieve total nematode control. The use of potting mixtures that are not fully disinfested reduces nematological risk, but could mask the presence of pathogen nematodes in seemingly healthy stock (Castillo et al., 2010).

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Recommended for listing as an RNQP, based on EPPO PM4 Standard and data.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
No

Proposed Risk management measure:
 

Justification (if necessary):
 
The Fruit SEWG discussed how visual examination should be performed in a nursery: although random inspection of the roots of asymptomatic plants for this nematode is better (i.e. uprooting some asymptomatic plants), some countries considered that it would have an unacceptable economic impact and recommended that root examination is only performed following suspicions.

REFERENCES:
  • Aït Hamza M, Ali N, Tavoillot J, Fossati-Gaschignard O, Boubaker H, El Mousadik A & Mateille T (2017) Diversity of root-knot nematodes in Moroccan olive nurseries and orchards: does Meloidogyne javanica disperse according to invasion processes? BMC Ecology 17, 1-13. Available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-017-0153-9
  • Ali N, Chapuis E, Tavoillot J & Mateille T (2014) Plant-parasitic nematodes associated with olive tree (Olea europaea L.) with a focus on the Mediterranean Basin: a review. Comptes Rendus Biologies 337, 423–442. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2014.05.006
  • Archidona-Yuste A, Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C, LieÂbanas G, Rapoport HF, Castillo P & Palomares-Rius JE (2018) Diversity of root-knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne, 1892 (Nematoda: Meloidogynidae) associated with olive plants and environmental cues regarding their distribution in southern Spain. PLoS ONE 13, e0198236. Available at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
  • Castillo P, Nico AI, Navas-Cortés JA, Landa BB, Jimenez-Diaz RM & Vovlas N (2010) Plant-parasitic nematodes attacking olive trees and their management. Plant Disease 94, 148–162.
  • Nico A, Rapoport HF, Jiménez-Diaz RM & Castillo P (2002) Incidence and population density of plant-parasitic
  • nematodes associated with olive planting stocks at nurseries in southern Spain. Plant Disease 86, 1075–1079.

HOST PLANT N°5: Prunus armeniaca (PRNAR) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Remarks: M. incognita is only mentioned in PM4/017(3) olive trees and rootstocks, not in the PM4 certification schemes available for all Prunus spp. and pome fruits. These schemes post-date the first mentioning of M. javanica in Europe. However, these certification schemes require that nuclear stock is produced in sterilized growing medium.
The assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

 
Justification:
 
Main transmission mode - in addition to plants for planting - is soil (EPPO, 2022; PM4/017)
Meloidogyne arenaria, M. javanica and M. incognita are the most common species in warmer conditions of southern Europe, but also in glasshouses in northern Europe (Wesemael et al., 2011) e.g. Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica are the most predominant root-knot nematodes in Spain. Meloidogyne arenaria and M. javanica were positively associated with sandy texture (e.g. soil) (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Goodey et al. (1965) list a total of 770 host species or varieties for Meloidogyne javanica, including many weeds as well as crop plants. In addition to those crops in the list of hosts, there are many others of economic importance, including tea, grapevine, many vegetables, fruit trees, cereals and ornamentals (cited from CABI, 2021).
Eggs and juveniles can be transported with soil, so anything which has soil attached is a potential pathway including agricultural equipment and containers, tools, vehicle tires, and workers clothing or boots (CABI, 2021). The nematodes can also be transported by water; down river flooded fields can become infected (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Meloidogyne spp. are not transmitted with seeds (in Wesemael et al., 2011).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Although Meloidogyne is considered worldwide as the most important genus of plant-parasitic nematodes,
information in the scientific literature on the economic impact of root-knot nematodes in Europe is scarce (Wesemael et al., 2011).
The four major Meloidogyne species, M. incognita, M. javanica, M. arenaria, and M. hapla can cause economic damage to stone fruits (Marull et al., 1992) and yield losses (McKenry, 2004) in different parts of the world. Root-knot nematodes cause a 15% loss in vigour and yield of Prunus crops (nurseries and orchards) on a worldwide basis. The economic importance of Meloidogyne spp. to stone fruits was shown with the use of nematicides and rootstocks with nematode resistance. Sharpe et al. (1993) showed that pre-plant fumigation with methyl bromide to control Meloidogyne spp. in peaches increased the cumulative yield over 3 seasons by 2535Kg per hectare. Nematicides have been used to increase yield on many different crops. In Libya, 2000 peach seedlings died when planted into soil heavily infested with M. javanica. The total loss to three nurseries during 1979-1980 was estimated at 115500 Libyan Dinars (Siddiqi, 1982). Meloidogyne javanica is economically important to almond production. In Libya, economic loss of almond seedlings from root-knot nematodes was estimated at 330,000 Libyan Dinars (Siddiqi, 1982).
In Mediterranean and warm temperate climates, the perennial crops most affected by root-knot nematode species include Prunus spp. and, to a lesser extent fig (Ficus carica) (Saucet et al., 2016).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Medium

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
No

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
For most Prunus spp., root-stocks resistant against root knot nematodes are available (Saucet et al., 2016); however, the Fruit SEWG considered that these rootstocks are only rarely used. The economic impact is rated as Medium in absence of resistant rootstocks.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Rootstocks with a wide resistance spectrum for Meloidogyne spp. have been developed using the Myrobalan plum, P. cerasifera, as a parental (Saucet et al., 2016).
Use of clean soil: The propagation material is kept either in containers of sterilized growing medium or in soil that has been tested and found free from Xiphinema diversicaudatum (see EPPO Standard PM4/35), Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita, M. javanica, Pratylenchus vulnus and Verticillium dahlia (EPPO 2022)
Woody crops are generally grown in long-term specialized production systems that remain in place for decades. It is not possible, therefore, to control polyphagous root-knot nematode species by crop rotation (Saucet et al., 2016).

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Recommended for listing as an RNQP based on data.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
No

Proposed Risk management measure:
 

Justification (if necessary):
 
The Fruit SEWG discussed how visual examination should be performed in a nursery: although random inspection of the roots of asymptomatic plants for this nematode is better (i.e. uprooting some asymptomatic plants), some countries considered that it would have an unacceptable economic impact and recommended that root examination is only performed following suspicions.

REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2021). Meloidogyne incognita (root-knot nematode) (accessed 2/May/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.33245
  • Candido V, Miccolis V, Basile M, D Addabbo T & Gatta G (2005). Soil solarization for the control of Meloidogyne javanica on eggplant in Southern Italy. Acta horticulturae, 698, 195-200.
  • Clavero-Camacho I, Archidona-Yuste A, Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C, Castillo P & Palomares-Rius JE (2024) Prevalence and ecological factors affecting the distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in Prunus groves in Spain Journal of Integrative Agriculture 23(2), 566–589.
  • Duval H, Van Ghelder C, Portier U, Confolent C, Meza P & Esmenjaud D (2019). New Data Completing the Spectrum of the Ma, RMia, and RMja Genes for Resistance to Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Prunus. Phytopathology 109(4):615-622. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-05-18-0173-R
  • EPPO (2022) PM 4/17 (3) Certification scheme for olive trees and rootstocks. EPPO Bulletin 52, 590–60. DOI: 10.1111/epp.1288
  • Gonçalves AR, Conceição IL, Kormpi M & Tzortzakakis EA (2020). Lavandula angustifolia and Oxalis pes-caprae, hosts of Meloidogyne hapla and Meloidogyne javanica - A note for Meloidogyne luci in Greece. Hellenic Plant Protection Journal 13(2), 78-82. https://sciendo.com/pl/article/10.2478/hppj-2020-0008?content-tab=abstract.
  • Goodey JB, Franklin MT, Hooper DJ (1965). T. Goodey's the nematode parasites of plants catalogued under their hosts. 3rd. ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
  • Maleita C, Santos D, Abrantes I & Esteves I (2022). First report of root knot nematodes Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica parasitizing sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas, in Portugal. Plant Disease 106(9), 2536.
  • Marull J, Pinochet J, Felipe A & Cenis JL (1994) Resistance verification in Prunus selections to a mixture of thirteen Meloidogyne isolates and resistance mechanisms of a peach-almond hybrid to M. javanica. Fundamental and Applied Nematology 17(1), pp.85-92.
  • McKenry MV (2004) Three nematode genera and the damage they cause for plum producers. Journal of Nematology 36(3), p.333.
  • Philis J, 1983. Occurrence of Meloidogyne spp. and races on the island of Cyprus. Nematologia Mediterranea 11(1), 13-19.
  • Samaliev HY, Salkova DS, Baycheva OTs, Zinovieva SV & Udalova ZhV (2018) Investigations of the root-knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne (Goeldi, 1887) on the territories of Bulgaria and Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Parasitology 12(4), 94–98. DOI: 10.31016/1998-8435-2018-12-4-94-9
  • Saucet SB, Van Ghelder C, Abad P, Duval H & Esmenjaud D9 (2016) Resistance to root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp. in woody plants. New Phytologist (2016) 211: 41–56. doi: 10.1111/nph.13933
  • Sharpe RR, Pusey PL, Nyczepir AP & Florkowski WJ (1993) Yield and economics of intervention with peach tree short life disease. Journal of production agriculture 6(2), pp.241-244.
  • Siddiqi ZA (1982) Nematode problems in fruit tree nurseries in Libya. The Libyan Journal of Agriculture 11(1).
  • Simeone AM & Di Vito M (1990) Reactions to nematodes of selections of peach rootstocks. Peach, XXIII IHC 315, pp.197-202.
  • Terlidou MC (1974). Effect of root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica (Treub) Chitwood in vine nurseries. Vitis, 12, 316-319.
  • Toth F, Bogdányi FT, Petrikovszki R, Gódor A, Zalai M, Balint B, Sunder P & Myrta, A. (2019). Control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita and weeds in protected cucumber with dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) over two crop cycles: The first results in Hungary. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 54(2), 267-278.
  • Wesemael W, Viaene N & Moens M. (2011). Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Europe. Nematology 13(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1163/138855410X526831

HOST PLANT N°6: Prunus avium (PRNAV) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Remarks: M. incognita is only mentioned in PM4/017(3) olive trees and rootstocks, not in the PM4 certification schemes available for all Prunus spp. and pome fruits. These schemes post-date the first mentioning of M. javanica in Europe. However, these certification schemes require that nuclear stock is produced in sterilized growing medium.
The assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

 
Justification:
 
Main transmission mode - in addition to plants for planting - is soil (EPPO, 2022; PM4/017)
Meloidogyne arenaria, M. javanica and M. incognita are the most common species in warmer conditions of southern Europe, but also in glasshouses in northern Europe (Wesemael et al., 2011) e.g. Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica are the most predominant root-knot nematodes in Spain. Meloidogyne arenaria and M. javanica were positively associated with sandy texture (e.g. soil) (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Goodey et al. (1965) list a total of 770 host species or varieties for Meloidogyne javanica, including many weeds as well as crop plants. In addition to those crops in the list of hosts, there are many others of economic importance, including tea, grapevine, many vegetables, fruit trees, cereals and ornamentals (cited from CABI, 2021).
Eggs and juveniles can be transported with soil, so anything which has soil attached is a potential pathway including agricultural equipment and containers, tools, vehicle tires, and workers clothing or boots (CABI, 2021). The nematodes can also be transported by water; down river flooded fields can become infected (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Meloidogyne spp. are not transmitted with seeds (in Wesemael et al., 2011).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Although Meloidogyne is considered worldwide as the most important genus of plant-parasitic nematodes,
information in the scientific literature on the economic impact of root-knot nematodes in Europe is scarce (Wesemael et al., 2011).
The four major Meloidogyne species, M. incognita, M. javanica, M. arenaria, and M. hapla can cause economic damage to stone fruits (Marull et al., 1992) and yield losses (McKenry, 2004) in different parts of the world. Root-knot nematodes cause a 15% loss in vigour and yield of Prunus crops (nurseries and orchards) on a worldwide basis. The economic importance of Meloidogyne spp. to stone fruits was shown with the use of nematicides and rootstocks with nematode resistance. Sharpe et al. (1993) showed that pre-plant fumigation with methyl bromide to control Meloidogyne spp. in peaches increased the cumulative yield over 3 seasons by 2535Kg per hectare. Nematicides have been used to increase yield on many different crops. In Libya, 2000 peach seedlings died when planted into soil heavily infested with M. javanica. The total loss to three nurseries during 1979-1980 was estimated at 115500 Libyan Dinars (Siddiqi, 1982). Meloidogyne javanica is economically important to almond production. In Libya, economic loss of almond seedlings from root-knot nematodes was estimated at 330,000 Libyan Dinars (Siddiqi, 1982).
In Mediterranean and warm temperate climates, the perennial crops most affected by root-knot nematode species include Prunus spp. and, to a lesser extent fig (Ficus carica) (Saucet et al., 2016).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Medium

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
No

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
For most Prunus spp., root-stocks resistant against root knot nematodes are available (Saucet et al., 2016); however, the Fruit SEWG considered that these rootstocks are only rarely used. The economic impact is rated as Medium in absence of resistant rootstocks.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Rootstocks with a wide resistance spectrum for Meloidogyne spp. have been developed using the Myrobalan plum, P. cerasifera, as a parental (Saucet et al., 2016).
Use of clean soil: The propagation material is kept either in containers of sterilized growing medium or in soil that has been tested and found free from Xiphinema diversicaudatum (see EPPO Standard PM4/35), Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita, M. javanica, Pratylenchus vulnus and Verticillium dahlia (EPPO 2022)
Woody crops are generally grown in long-term specialized production systems that remain in place for decades. It is not possible, therefore, to control polyphagous root-knot nematode species by crop rotation (Saucet et al., 2016).

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Recommended for listing as an RNQP based on data.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
No

Proposed Risk management measure:
 

Justification (if necessary):
 
The Fruit SEWG discussed how visual examination should be performed in a nursery: although random inspection of the roots of asymptomatic plants for this nematode is better (i.e. uprooting some asymptomatic plants), some countries considered that it would have an unacceptable economic impact and recommended that root examination is only performed following suspicions.

REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2021). Meloidogyne incognita (root-knot nematode) (accessed 2/May/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.33245
  • Candido V, Miccolis V, Basile M, D Addabbo T & Gatta G (2005). Soil solarization for the control of Meloidogyne javanica on eggplant in Southern Italy. Acta horticulturae, 698, 195-200.
  • Clavero-Camacho I, Archidona-Yuste A, Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C, Castillo P & Palomares-Rius JE (2024) Prevalence and ecological factors affecting the distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in Prunus groves in Spain Journal of Integrative Agriculture 23(2), 566–589.
  • Duval H, Van Ghelder C, Portier U, Confolent C, Meza P & Esmenjaud D (2019). New Data Completing the Spectrum of the Ma, RMia, and RMja Genes for Resistance to Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Prunus. Phytopathology 109(4):615-622. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-05-18-0173-R
  • EPPO (2022) PM 4/17 (3) Certification scheme for olive trees and rootstocks. EPPO Bulletin 52, 590–60. DOI: 10.1111/epp.1288
  • Gonçalves AR, Conceição IL, Kormpi M & Tzortzakakis EA (2020). Lavandula angustifolia and Oxalis pes-caprae, hosts of Meloidogyne hapla and Meloidogyne javanica - A note for Meloidogyne luci in Greece. Hellenic Plant Protection Journal 13(2), 78-82. https://sciendo.com/pl/article/10.2478/hppj-2020-0008?content-tab=abstract.
  • Goodey JB, Franklin MT, Hooper DJ (1965). T. Goodey's the nematode parasites of plants catalogued under their hosts. 3rd. ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
  • Maleita C, Santos D, Abrantes I & Esteves I (2022). First report of root knot nematodes Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica parasitizing sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas, in Portugal. Plant Disease 106(9), 2536.
  • Marull J, Pinochet J, Felipe A & Cenis JL (1994) Resistance verification in Prunus selections to a mixture of thirteen Meloidogyne isolates and resistance mechanisms of a peach-almond hybrid to M. javanica. Fundamental and Applied Nematology 17(1), pp.85-92.
  • McKenry MV (2004) Three nematode genera and the damage they cause for plum producers. Journal of Nematology 36(3), p.333.
  • Philis J, 1983. Occurrence of Meloidogyne spp. and races on the island of Cyprus. Nematologia Mediterranea 11(1), 13-19.
  • Samaliev HY, Salkova DS, Baycheva OTs, Zinovieva SV & Udalova ZhV (2018) Investigations of the root-knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne (Goeldi, 1887) on the territories of Bulgaria and Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Parasitology 12(4), 94–98. DOI: 10.31016/1998-8435-2018-12-4-94-9
  • Saucet SB, Van Ghelder C, Abad P, Duval H & Esmenjaud D9 (2016) Resistance to root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp. in woody plants. New Phytologist (2016) 211: 41–56. doi: 10.1111/nph.13933
  • Sharpe RR, Pusey PL, Nyczepir AP & Florkowski WJ (1993) Yield and economics of intervention with peach tree short life disease. Journal of production agriculture 6(2), pp.241-244.
  • Siddiqi ZA (1982) Nematode problems in fruit tree nurseries in Libya. The Libyan Journal of Agriculture 11(1).
  • Simeone AM & Di Vito M (1990) Reactions to nematodes of selections of peach rootstocks. Peach, XXIII IHC 315, pp.197-202.
  • Terlidou MC (1974). Effect of root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica (Treub) Chitwood in vine nurseries. Vitis, 12, 316-319.
  • Toth F, Bogdányi FT, Petrikovszki R, Gódor A, Zalai M, Balint B, Sunder P & Myrta, A. (2019). Control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita and weeds in protected cucumber with dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) over two crop cycles: The first results in Hungary. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 54(2), 267-278.
  • Wesemael W, Viaene N & Moens M. (2011). Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Europe. Nematology 13(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1163/138855410X526831

HOST PLANT N°7: Prunus cerasus (PRNCE) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Remarks: M. incognita is only mentioned in PM4/017(3) olive trees and rootstocks, not in the PM4 certification schemes available for all Prunus spp. and pome fruits. These schemes post-date the first mentioning of M. javanica in Europe. However, these certification schemes require that nuclear stock is produced in sterilized growing medium.
The assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

 
Justification:
 
Main transmission mode - in addition to plants for planting - is soil (EPPO, 2022; PM4/017)
Meloidogyne arenaria, M. javanica and M. incognita are the most common species in warmer conditions of southern Europe, but also in glasshouses in northern Europe (Wesemael et al., 2011) e.g. Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica are the most predominant root-knot nematodes in Spain. Meloidogyne arenaria and M. javanica were positively associated with sandy texture (e.g. soil) (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Goodey et al. (1965) list a total of 770 host species or varieties for Meloidogyne javanica, including many weeds as well as crop plants. In addition to those crops in the list of hosts, there are many others of economic importance, including tea, grapevine, many vegetables, fruit trees, cereals and ornamentals (cited from CABI, 2021).
Eggs and juveniles can be transported with soil, so anything which has soil attached is a potential pathway including agricultural equipment and containers, tools, vehicle tires, and workers clothing or boots (CABI, 2021). The nematodes can also be transported by water; down river flooded fields can become infected (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Meloidogyne spp. are not transmitted with seeds (in Wesemael et al., 2011).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Although Meloidogyne is considered worldwide as the most important genus of plant-parasitic nematodes,
information in the scientific literature on the economic impact of root-knot nematodes in Europe is scarce (Wesemael et al., 2011).
The four major Meloidogyne species, M. incognita, M. javanica, M. arenaria, and M. hapla can cause economic damage to stone fruits (Marull et al., 1992) and yield losses (McKenry, 2004) in different parts of the world. Root-knot nematodes cause a 15% loss in vigour and yield of Prunus crops (nurseries and orchards) on a worldwide basis. The economic importance of Meloidogyne spp. to stone fruits was shown with the use of nematicides and rootstocks with nematode resistance. Sharpe et al. (1993) showed that pre-plant fumigation with methyl bromide to control Meloidogyne spp. in peaches increased the cumulative yield over 3 seasons by 2535Kg per hectare. Nematicides have been used to increase yield on many different crops. In Libya, 2000 peach seedlings died when planted into soil heavily infested with M. javanica. The total loss to three nurseries during 1979-1980 was estimated at 115500 Libyan Dinars (Siddiqi, 1982). Meloidogyne javanica is economically important to almond production. In Libya, economic loss of almond seedlings from root-knot nematodes was estimated at 330,000 Libyan Dinars (Siddiqi, 1982).
In Mediterranean and warm temperate climates, the perennial crops most affected by root-knot nematode species include Prunus spp. and, to a lesser extent fig (Ficus carica) (Saucet et al., 2016).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Medium

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
No

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
For most Prunus spp., root-stocks resistant against root knot nematodes are available (Saucet et al., 2016); however, the Fruit SEWG considered that these rootstocks are only rarely used. The economic impact is rated as Medium in absence of resistant rootstocks.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Rootstocks with a wide resistance spectrum for Meloidogyne spp. have been developed using the Myrobalan plum, P. cerasifera, as a parental (Saucet et al., 2016).
Use of clean soil: The propagation material is kept either in containers of sterilized growing medium or in soil that has been tested and found free from Xiphinema diversicaudatum (see EPPO Standard PM4/35), Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita, M. javanica, Pratylenchus vulnus and Verticillium dahlia (EPPO 2022)
Woody crops are generally grown in long-term specialized production systems that remain in place for decades. It is not possible, therefore, to control polyphagous root-knot nematode species by crop rotation (Saucet et al., 2016).

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Recommended for listing as an RNQP based on data.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
No

Proposed Risk management measure:
 

Justification (if necessary):
 
The Fruit SEWG discussed how visual examination should be performed in a nursery: although random inspection of the roots of asymptomatic plants for this nematode is better (i.e. uprooting some asymptomatic plants), some countries considered that it would have an unacceptable economic impact and recommended that root examination is only performed following suspicions.

REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2021). Meloidogyne incognita (root-knot nematode) (accessed 2/May/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.33245
  • Candido V, Miccolis V, Basile M, D Addabbo T & Gatta G (2005). Soil solarization for the control of Meloidogyne javanica on eggplant in Southern Italy. Acta horticulturae, 698, 195-200.
  • Clavero-Camacho I, Archidona-Yuste A, Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C, Castillo P & Palomares-Rius JE (2024) Prevalence and ecological factors affecting the distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in Prunus groves in Spain Journal of Integrative Agriculture 23(2), 566–589.
  • Duval H, Van Ghelder C, Portier U, Confolent C, Meza P & Esmenjaud D (2019). New Data Completing the Spectrum of the Ma, RMia, and RMja Genes for Resistance to Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Prunus. Phytopathology 109(4):615-622. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-05-18-0173-R
  • EPPO (2022) PM 4/17 (3) Certification scheme for olive trees and rootstocks. EPPO Bulletin 52, 590–60. DOI: 10.1111/epp.1288
  • Gonçalves AR, Conceição IL, Kormpi M & Tzortzakakis EA (2020). Lavandula angustifolia and Oxalis pes-caprae, hosts of Meloidogyne hapla and Meloidogyne javanica - A note for Meloidogyne luci in Greece. Hellenic Plant Protection Journal 13(2), 78-82. https://sciendo.com/pl/article/10.2478/hppj-2020-0008?content-tab=abstract.
  • Goodey JB, Franklin MT, Hooper DJ (1965). T. Goodey's the nematode parasites of plants catalogued under their hosts. 3rd. ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
  • Maleita C, Santos D, Abrantes I & Esteves I (2022). First report of root knot nematodes Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica parasitizing sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas, in Portugal. Plant Disease 106(9), 2536.
  • Marull J, Pinochet J, Felipe A & Cenis JL (1994) Resistance verification in Prunus selections to a mixture of thirteen Meloidogyne isolates and resistance mechanisms of a peach-almond hybrid to M. javanica. Fundamental and Applied Nematology 17(1), pp.85-92.
  • McKenry MV (2004) Three nematode genera and the damage they cause for plum producers. Journal of Nematology 36(3), p.333.
  • Philis J, 1983. Occurrence of Meloidogyne spp. and races on the island of Cyprus. Nematologia Mediterranea 11(1), 13-19.
  • Samaliev HY, Salkova DS, Baycheva OTs, Zinovieva SV & Udalova ZhV (2018) Investigations of the root-knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne (Goeldi, 1887) on the territories of Bulgaria and Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Parasitology 12(4), 94–98. DOI: 10.31016/1998-8435-2018-12-4-94-9
  • Saucet SB, Van Ghelder C, Abad P, Duval H & Esmenjaud D9 (2016) Resistance to root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp. in woody plants. New Phytologist (2016) 211: 41–56. doi: 10.1111/nph.13933
  • Sharpe RR, Pusey PL, Nyczepir AP & Florkowski WJ (1993) Yield and economics of intervention with peach tree short life disease. Journal of production agriculture 6(2), pp.241-244.
  • Siddiqi ZA (1982) Nematode problems in fruit tree nurseries in Libya. The Libyan Journal of Agriculture 11(1).
  • Simeone AM & Di Vito M (1990) Reactions to nematodes of selections of peach rootstocks. Peach, XXIII IHC 315, pp.197-202.
  • Terlidou MC (1974). Effect of root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica (Treub) Chitwood in vine nurseries. Vitis, 12, 316-319.
  • Toth F, Bogdányi FT, Petrikovszki R, Gódor A, Zalai M, Balint B, Sunder P & Myrta, A. (2019). Control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita and weeds in protected cucumber with dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) over two crop cycles: The first results in Hungary. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 54(2), 267-278.
  • Wesemael W, Viaene N & Moens M. (2011). Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Europe. Nematology 13(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1163/138855410X526831

HOST PLANT N°8: Prunus domestica (PRNDO) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Remarks: M. incognita is only mentioned in PM4/017(3) olive trees and rootstocks, not in the PM4 certification schemes available for all Prunus spp. and pome fruits. These schemes post-date the first mentioning of M. javanica in Europe. However, these certification schemes require that nuclear stock is produced in sterilized growing medium.
The assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

 
Justification:
 
Main transmission mode - in addition to plants for planting - is soil (EPPO, 2022; PM4/017)
Meloidogyne arenaria, M. javanica and M. incognita are the most common species in warmer conditions of southern Europe, but also in glasshouses in northern Europe (Wesemael et al., 2011) e.g. Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica are the most predominant root-knot nematodes in Spain. Meloidogyne arenaria and M. javanica were positively associated with sandy texture (e.g. soil) (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Goodey et al. (1965) list a total of 770 host species or varieties for Meloidogyne javanica, including many weeds as well as crop plants. In addition to those crops in the list of hosts, there are many others of economic importance, including tea, grapevine, many vegetables, fruit trees, cereals and ornamentals (cited from CABI, 2021).
Eggs and juveniles can be transported with soil, so anything which has soil attached is a potential pathway including agricultural equipment and containers, tools, vehicle tires, and workers clothing or boots (CABI, 2021). The nematodes can also be transported by water; down river flooded fields can become infected (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Meloidogyne spp. are not transmitted with seeds (in Wesemael et al., 2011).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Although Meloidogyne is considered worldwide as the most important genus of plant-parasitic nematodes,
information in the scientific literature on the economic impact of root-knot nematodes in Europe is scarce (Wesemael et al., 2011).
The four major Meloidogyne species, M. incognita, M. javanica, M. arenaria, and M. hapla can cause economic damage to stone fruits (Marull et al., 1992) and yield losses (McKenry, 2004) in different parts of the world. Root-knot nematodes cause a 15% loss in vigour and yield of Prunus crops (nurseries and orchards) on a worldwide basis. The economic importance of Meloidogyne spp. to stone fruits was shown with the use of nematicides and rootstocks with nematode resistance. Sharpe et al. (1993) showed that pre-plant fumigation with methyl bromide to control Meloidogyne spp. in peaches increased the cumulative yield over 3 seasons by 2535Kg per hectare. Nematicides have been used to increase yield on many different crops. In Libya, 2000 peach seedlings died when planted into soil heavily infested with M. javanica. The total loss to three nurseries during 1979-1980 was estimated at 115500 Libyan Dinars (Siddiqi, 1982). Meloidogyne javanica is economically important to almond production. In Libya, economic loss of almond seedlings from root-knot nematodes was estimated at 330,000 Libyan Dinars (Siddiqi, 1982).
In Mediterranean and warm temperate climates, the perennial crops most affected by root-knot nematode species include Prunus spp. and, to a lesser extent fig (Ficus carica) (Saucet et al., 2016).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Medium

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
No

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
For most Prunus spp., root-stocks resistant against root knot nematodes are available (Saucet et al., 2016); however, the Fruit SEWG considered that these rootstocks are only rarely used. The economic impact is rated as Medium in absence of resistant rootstocks.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Rootstocks with a wide resistance spectrum for Meloidogyne spp. have been developed using the Myrobalan plum, P. cerasifera, as a parental (Saucet et al., 2016).
Use of clean soil: The propagation material is kept either in containers of sterilized growing medium or in soil that has been tested and found free from Xiphinema diversicaudatum (see EPPO Standard PM4/35), Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita, M. javanica, Pratylenchus vulnus and Verticillium dahlia (EPPO 2022)
Woody crops are generally grown in long-term specialized production systems that remain in place for decades. It is not possible, therefore, to control polyphagous root-knot nematode species by crop rotation (Saucet et al., 2016).

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Recommended for listing as an RNQP based on data.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
No

Proposed Risk management measure:
 

Justification (if necessary):
 
The Fruit SEWG discussed how visual examination should be performed in a nursery: although random inspection of the roots of asymptomatic plants for this nematode is better (i.e. uprooting some asymptomatic plants), some countries considered that it would have an unacceptable economic impact and recommended that root examination is only performed following suspicions.

REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2021). Meloidogyne incognita (root-knot nematode) (accessed 2/May/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.33245
  • Candido V, Miccolis V, Basile M, D Addabbo T & Gatta G (2005). Soil solarization for the control of Meloidogyne javanica on eggplant in Southern Italy. Acta horticulturae, 698, 195-200.
  • Clavero-Camacho I, Archidona-Yuste A, Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C, Castillo P & Palomares-Rius JE (2024) Prevalence and ecological factors affecting the distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in Prunus groves in Spain Journal of Integrative Agriculture 23(2), 566–589.
  • Duval H, Van Ghelder C, Portier U, Confolent C, Meza P & Esmenjaud D (2019). New Data Completing the Spectrum of the Ma, RMia, and RMja Genes for Resistance to Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Prunus. Phytopathology 109(4):615-622. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-05-18-0173-R
  • EPPO (2022) PM 4/17 (3) Certification scheme for olive trees and rootstocks. EPPO Bulletin 52, 590–60. DOI: 10.1111/epp.1288
  • Gonçalves AR, Conceição IL, Kormpi M & Tzortzakakis EA (2020). Lavandula angustifolia and Oxalis pes-caprae, hosts of Meloidogyne hapla and Meloidogyne javanica - A note for Meloidogyne luci in Greece. Hellenic Plant Protection Journal 13(2), 78-82. https://sciendo.com/pl/article/10.2478/hppj-2020-0008?content-tab=abstract.
  • Goodey JB, Franklin MT, Hooper DJ (1965). T. Goodey's the nematode parasites of plants catalogued under their hosts. 3rd. ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
  • Maleita C, Santos D, Abrantes I & Esteves I (2022). First report of root knot nematodes Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica parasitizing sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas, in Portugal. Plant Disease 106(9), 2536.
  • Marull J, Pinochet J, Felipe A & Cenis JL (1994) Resistance verification in Prunus selections to a mixture of thirteen Meloidogyne isolates and resistance mechanisms of a peach-almond hybrid to M. javanica. Fundamental and Applied Nematology 17(1), pp.85-92.
  • McKenry MV (2004) Three nematode genera and the damage they cause for plum producers. Journal of Nematology 36(3), p.333.
  • Philis J, 1983. Occurrence of Meloidogyne spp. and races on the island of Cyprus. Nematologia Mediterranea 11(1), 13-19.
  • Samaliev HY, Salkova DS, Baycheva OTs, Zinovieva SV & Udalova ZhV (2018) Investigations of the root-knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne (Goeldi, 1887) on the territories of Bulgaria and Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Parasitology 12(4), 94–98. DOI: 10.31016/1998-8435-2018-12-4-94-9
  • Saucet SB, Van Ghelder C, Abad P, Duval H & Esmenjaud D9 (2016) Resistance to root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp. in woody plants. New Phytologist (2016) 211: 41–56. doi: 10.1111/nph.13933
  • Sharpe RR, Pusey PL, Nyczepir AP & Florkowski WJ (1993) Yield and economics of intervention with peach tree short life disease. Journal of production agriculture 6(2), pp.241-244.
  • Siddiqi ZA (1982) Nematode problems in fruit tree nurseries in Libya. The Libyan Journal of Agriculture 11(1).
  • Simeone AM & Di Vito M (1990) Reactions to nematodes of selections of peach rootstocks. Peach, XXIII IHC 315, pp.197-202.
  • Terlidou MC (1974). Effect of root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica (Treub) Chitwood in vine nurseries. Vitis, 12, 316-319.
  • Toth F, Bogdányi FT, Petrikovszki R, Gódor A, Zalai M, Balint B, Sunder P & Myrta, A. (2019). Control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita and weeds in protected cucumber with dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) over two crop cycles: The first results in Hungary. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 54(2), 267-278.
  • Wesemael W, Viaene N & Moens M. (2011). Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Europe. Nematology 13(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1163/138855410X526831

HOST PLANT N°9: Prunus dulcis (PRNDU) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Remarks: M. incognita is only mentioned in PM4/017(3) olive trees and rootstocks, not in the PM4 certification schemes available for all Prunus spp. and pome fruits. These schemes post-date the first mentioning of M. javanica in Europe. However, these certification schemes require that nuclear stock is produced in sterilized growing medium.
The assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

 
Justification:
 
Main transmission mode - in addition to plants for planting - is soil (EPPO, 2022; PM4/017)
Meloidogyne arenaria, M. javanica and M. incognita are the most common species in warmer conditions of southern Europe, but also in glasshouses in northern Europe (Wesemael et al., 2011) e.g. Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica are the most predominant root-knot nematodes in Spain. Meloidogyne arenaria and M. javanica were positively associated with sandy texture (e.g. soil) (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Goodey et al. (1965) list a total of 770 host species or varieties for Meloidogyne javanica, including many weeds as well as crop plants. In addition to those crops in the list of hosts, there are many others of economic importance, including tea, grapevine, many vegetables, fruit trees, cereals and ornamentals (cited from CABI, 2021).
Eggs and juveniles can be transported with soil, so anything which has soil attached is a potential pathway including agricultural equipment and containers, tools, vehicle tires, and workers clothing or boots (CABI, 2021). The nematodes can also be transported by water; down river flooded fields can become infected (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Meloidogyne spp. are not transmitted with seeds (in Wesemael et al., 2011).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Although Meloidogyne is considered worldwide as the most important genus of plant-parasitic nematodes,
information in the scientific literature on the economic impact of root-knot nematodes in Europe is scarce (Wesemael et al., 2011).
The four major Meloidogyne species, M. incognita, M. javanica, M. arenaria, and M. hapla can cause economic damage to stone fruits (Marull et al., 1992) and yield losses (McKenry, 2004) in different parts of the world. Root-knot nematodes cause a 15% loss in vigour and yield of Prunus crops (nurseries and orchards) on a worldwide basis. The economic importance of Meloidogyne spp. to stone fruits was shown with the use of nematicides and rootstocks with nematode resistance. Sharpe et al. (1993) showed that pre-plant fumigation with methyl bromide to control Meloidogyne spp. in peaches increased the cumulative yield over 3 seasons by 2535Kg per hectare. Nematicides have been used to increase yield on many different crops. In Libya, 2000 peach seedlings died when planted into soil heavily infested with M. javanica. The total loss to three nurseries during 1979-1980 was estimated at 115500 Libyan Dinars (Siddiqi, 1982). Meloidogyne javanica is economically important to almond production. In Libya, economic loss of almond seedlings from root-knot nematodes was estimated at 330,000 Libyan Dinars (Siddiqi, 1982).
In Mediterranean and warm temperate climates, the perennial crops most affected by root-knot nematode species include Prunus spp. and, to a lesser extent fig (Ficus carica) (Saucet et al., 2016).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Medium

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
No

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
For most Prunus spp., root-stocks resistant against root knot nematodes are available (Saucet et al., 2016); however, the Fruit SEWG considered that these rootstocks are only rarely used. The economic impact is rated as Medium in absence of resistant rootstocks.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Rootstocks with a wide resistance spectrum for Meloidogyne spp. have been developed using the Myrobalan plum, P. cerasifera, as a parental (Saucet et al., 2016).
Use of clean soil: The propagation material is kept either in containers of sterilized growing medium or in soil that has been tested and found free from Xiphinema diversicaudatum (see EPPO Standard PM4/35), Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita, M. javanica, Pratylenchus vulnus and Verticillium dahlia (EPPO 2022)
Woody crops are generally grown in long-term specialized production systems that remain in place for decades. It is not possible, therefore, to control polyphagous root-knot nematode species by crop rotation (Saucet et al., 2016).

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Recommended for listing as an RNQP based on data.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
No

Proposed Risk management measure:
 

Justification (if necessary):
 
The Fruit SEWG discussed how visual examination should be performed in a nursery: although random inspection of the roots of asymptomatic plants for this nematode is better (i.e. uprooting some asymptomatic plants), some countries considered that it would have an unacceptable economic impact and recommended that root examination is only performed following suspicions.

REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2021). Meloidogyne incognita (root-knot nematode) (accessed 2/May/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.33245
  • Candido V, Miccolis V, Basile M, D Addabbo T & Gatta G (2005). Soil solarization for the control of Meloidogyne javanica on eggplant in Southern Italy. Acta horticulturae, 698, 195-200.
  • Clavero-Camacho I, Archidona-Yuste A, Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C, Castillo P & Palomares-Rius JE (2024) Prevalence and ecological factors affecting the distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in Prunus groves in Spain Journal of Integrative Agriculture 23(2), 566–589.
  • Duval H, Van Ghelder C, Portier U, Confolent C, Meza P & Esmenjaud D (2019). New Data Completing the Spectrum of the Ma, RMia, and RMja Genes for Resistance to Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Prunus. Phytopathology 109(4):615-622. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-05-18-0173-R
  • EPPO (2022) PM 4/17 (3) Certification scheme for olive trees and rootstocks. EPPO Bulletin 52, 590–60. DOI: 10.1111/epp.1288
  • Gonçalves AR, Conceição IL, Kormpi M & Tzortzakakis EA (2020). Lavandula angustifolia and Oxalis pes-caprae, hosts of Meloidogyne hapla and Meloidogyne javanica - A note for Meloidogyne luci in Greece. Hellenic Plant Protection Journal 13(2), 78-82. https://sciendo.com/pl/article/10.2478/hppj-2020-0008?content-tab=abstract.
  • Goodey JB, Franklin MT, Hooper DJ (1965). T. Goodey's the nematode parasites of plants catalogued under their hosts. 3rd. ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
  • Maleita C, Santos D, Abrantes I & Esteves I (2022). First report of root knot nematodes Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica parasitizing sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas, in Portugal. Plant Disease 106(9), 2536.
  • Marull J, Pinochet J, Felipe A & Cenis JL (1994) Resistance verification in Prunus selections to a mixture of thirteen Meloidogyne isolates and resistance mechanisms of a peach-almond hybrid to M. javanica. Fundamental and Applied Nematology 17(1), pp.85-92.
  • McKenry MV (2004) Three nematode genera and the damage they cause for plum producers. Journal of Nematology 36(3), p.333.
  • Philis J, 1983. Occurrence of Meloidogyne spp. and races on the island of Cyprus. Nematologia Mediterranea 11(1), 13-19.
  • Samaliev HY, Salkova DS, Baycheva OTs, Zinovieva SV & Udalova ZhV (2018) Investigations of the root-knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne (Goeldi, 1887) on the territories of Bulgaria and Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Parasitology 12(4), 94–98. DOI: 10.31016/1998-8435-2018-12-4-94-9
  • Saucet SB, Van Ghelder C, Abad P, Duval H & Esmenjaud D9 (2016) Resistance to root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp. in woody plants. New Phytologist (2016) 211: 41–56. doi: 10.1111/nph.13933
  • Sharpe RR, Pusey PL, Nyczepir AP & Florkowski WJ (1993) Yield and economics of intervention with peach tree short life disease. Journal of production agriculture 6(2), pp.241-244.
  • Siddiqi ZA (1982) Nematode problems in fruit tree nurseries in Libya. The Libyan Journal of Agriculture 11(1).
  • Simeone AM & Di Vito M (1990) Reactions to nematodes of selections of peach rootstocks. Peach, XXIII IHC 315, pp.197-202.
  • Terlidou MC (1974). Effect of root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica (Treub) Chitwood in vine nurseries. Vitis, 12, 316-319.
  • Toth F, Bogdányi FT, Petrikovszki R, Gódor A, Zalai M, Balint B, Sunder P & Myrta, A. (2019). Control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita and weeds in protected cucumber with dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) over two crop cycles: The first results in Hungary. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 54(2), 267-278.
  • Wesemael W, Viaene N & Moens M. (2011). Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Europe. Nematology 13(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1163/138855410X526831

HOST PLANT N°10: Prunus persica (PRNPS) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Remarks: M. incognita is only mentioned in PM4/017(3) olive trees and rootstocks, not in the PM4 certification schemes available for all Prunus spp. and pome fruits. These schemes post-date the first mentioning of M. javanica in Europe. However, these certification schemes require that nuclear stock is produced in sterilized growing medium.
The assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

 
Justification:
 
Main transmission mode - in addition to plants for planting - is soil (EPPO, 2022; PM4/017)
Meloidogyne arenaria, M. javanica and M. incognita are the most common species in warmer conditions of southern Europe, but also in glasshouses in northern Europe (Wesemael et al., 2011) e.g. Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica are the most predominant root-knot nematodes in Spain. Meloidogyne arenaria and M. javanica were positively associated with sandy texture (e.g. soil) (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Goodey et al. (1965) list a total of 770 host species or varieties for Meloidogyne javanica, including many weeds as well as crop plants. In addition to those crops in the list of hosts, there are many others of economic importance, including tea, grapevine, many vegetables, fruit trees, cereals and ornamentals (cited from CABI, 2021).
Eggs and juveniles can be transported with soil, so anything which has soil attached is a potential pathway including agricultural equipment and containers, tools, vehicle tires, and workers clothing or boots (CABI, 2021). The nematodes can also be transported by water; down river flooded fields can become infected (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Meloidogyne spp. are not transmitted with seeds (in Wesemael et al., 2011).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Although Meloidogyne is considered worldwide as the most important genus of plant-parasitic nematodes,
information in the scientific literature on the economic impact of root-knot nematodes in Europe is scarce (Wesemael et al., 2011).
The four major Meloidogyne species, M. incognita, M. javanica, M. arenaria, and M. hapla can cause economic damage to stone fruits (Marull et al., 1992) and yield losses (McKenry, 2004) in different parts of the world. Root-knot nematodes cause a 15% loss in vigour and yield of Prunus crops (nurseries and orchards) on a worldwide basis. The economic importance of Meloidogyne spp. to stone fruits was shown with the use of nematicides and rootstocks with nematode resistance. Sharpe et al. (1993) showed that pre-plant fumigation with methyl bromide to control Meloidogyne spp. in peaches increased the cumulative yield over 3 seasons by 2535Kg per hectare. Nematicides have been used to increase yield on many different crops. In Libya, 2000 peach seedlings died when planted into soil heavily infested with M. javanica. The total loss to three nurseries during 1979-1980 was estimated at 115500 Libyan Dinars (Siddiqi, 1982). Meloidogyne javanica is economically important to almond production. In Libya, economic loss of almond seedlings from root-knot nematodes was estimated at 330,000 Libyan Dinars (Siddiqi, 1982).
In Mediterranean and warm temperate climates, the perennial crops most affected by root-knot nematode species include Prunus spp. and, to a lesser extent fig (Ficus carica) (Saucet et al., 2016).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Medium

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
No

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
For most Prunus spp., root-stocks resistant against root knot nematodes are available (Saucet et al., 2016); however, the Fruit SEWG considered that these rootstocks are only rarely used. The economic impact is rated as Medium in absence of resistant rootstocks.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Rootstocks with a wide resistance spectrum for Meloidogyne spp. have been developed using the Myrobalan plum, P. cerasifera, as a parental (Saucet et al., 2016).
Use of clean soil: The propagation material is kept either in containers of sterilized growing medium or in soil that has been tested and found free from Xiphinema diversicaudatum (see EPPO Standard PM4/35), Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita, M. javanica, Pratylenchus vulnus and Verticillium dahlia (EPPO 2022)
Woody crops are generally grown in long-term specialized production systems that remain in place for decades. It is not possible, therefore, to control polyphagous root-knot nematode species by crop rotation (Saucet et al., 2016).

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Recommended for listing as an RNQP based on data.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
No

Proposed Risk management measure:
 

Justification (if necessary):
 
The Fruit SEWG discussed how visual examination should be performed in a nursery: although random inspection of the roots of asymptomatic plants for this nematode is better (i.e. uprooting some asymptomatic plants), some countries considered that it would have an unacceptable economic impact and recommended that root examination is only performed following suspicions.

REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2021). Meloidogyne incognita (root-knot nematode) (accessed 2/May/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.33245
  • Candido V, Miccolis V, Basile M, D Addabbo T & Gatta G (2005). Soil solarization for the control of Meloidogyne javanica on eggplant in Southern Italy. Acta horticulturae, 698, 195-200.
  • Clavero-Camacho I, Archidona-Yuste A, Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C, Castillo P & Palomares-Rius JE (2024) Prevalence and ecological factors affecting the distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in Prunus groves in Spain Journal of Integrative Agriculture 23(2), 566–589.
  • Duval H, Van Ghelder C, Portier U, Confolent C, Meza P & Esmenjaud D (2019). New Data Completing the Spectrum of the Ma, RMia, and RMja Genes for Resistance to Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Prunus. Phytopathology 109(4):615-622. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-05-18-0173-R
  • EPPO (2022) PM 4/17 (3) Certification scheme for olive trees and rootstocks. EPPO Bulletin 52, 590–60. DOI: 10.1111/epp.1288
  • Gonçalves AR, Conceição IL, Kormpi M & Tzortzakakis EA (2020). Lavandula angustifolia and Oxalis pes-caprae, hosts of Meloidogyne hapla and Meloidogyne javanica - A note for Meloidogyne luci in Greece. Hellenic Plant Protection Journal 13(2), 78-82. https://sciendo.com/pl/article/10.2478/hppj-2020-0008?content-tab=abstract.
  • Goodey JB, Franklin MT, Hooper DJ (1965). T. Goodey's the nematode parasites of plants catalogued under their hosts. 3rd. ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
  • Maleita C, Santos D, Abrantes I & Esteves I (2022). First report of root knot nematodes Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica parasitizing sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas, in Portugal. Plant Disease 106(9), 2536.
  • Marull J, Pinochet J, Felipe A & Cenis JL (1994) Resistance verification in Prunus selections to a mixture of thirteen Meloidogyne isolates and resistance mechanisms of a peach-almond hybrid to M. javanica. Fundamental and Applied Nematology 17(1), pp.85-92.
  • McKenry MV (2004) Three nematode genera and the damage they cause for plum producers. Journal of Nematology 36(3), p.333.
  • Philis J, 1983. Occurrence of Meloidogyne spp. and races on the island of Cyprus. Nematologia Mediterranea 11(1), 13-19.
  • Samaliev HY, Salkova DS, Baycheva OTs, Zinovieva SV & Udalova ZhV (2018) Investigations of the root-knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne (Goeldi, 1887) on the territories of Bulgaria and Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Parasitology 12(4), 94–98. DOI: 10.31016/1998-8435-2018-12-4-94-9
  • Saucet SB, Van Ghelder C, Abad P, Duval H & Esmenjaud D9 (2016) Resistance to root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp. in woody plants. New Phytologist (2016) 211: 41–56. doi: 10.1111/nph.13933
  • Sharpe RR, Pusey PL, Nyczepir AP & Florkowski WJ (1993) Yield and economics of intervention with peach tree short life disease. Journal of production agriculture 6(2), pp.241-244.
  • Siddiqi ZA (1982) Nematode problems in fruit tree nurseries in Libya. The Libyan Journal of Agriculture 11(1).
  • Simeone AM & Di Vito M (1990) Reactions to nematodes of selections of peach rootstocks. Peach, XXIII IHC 315, pp.197-202.
  • Terlidou MC (1974). Effect of root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica (Treub) Chitwood in vine nurseries. Vitis, 12, 316-319.
  • Toth F, Bogdányi FT, Petrikovszki R, Gódor A, Zalai M, Balint B, Sunder P & Myrta, A. (2019). Control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita and weeds in protected cucumber with dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) over two crop cycles: The first results in Hungary. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 54(2), 267-278.
  • Wesemael W, Viaene N & Moens M. (2011). Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Europe. Nematology 13(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1163/138855410X526831

HOST PLANT N°11: Prunus salicina (PRNSC) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Remarks: M. incognita is only mentioned in PM4/017(3) olive trees and rootstocks, not in the PM4 certification schemes available for all Prunus spp. and pome fruits. These schemes post-date the first mentioning of M. javanica in Europe. However, these certification schemes require that nuclear stock is produced in sterilized growing medium.
The assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

 
Justification:
 
Main transmission mode - in addition to plants for planting - is soil (EPPO, 2022; PM4/017)
Meloidogyne arenaria, M. javanica and M. incognita are the most common species in warmer conditions of southern Europe, but also in glasshouses in northern Europe (Wesemael et al., 2011) e.g. Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica are the most predominant root-knot nematodes in Spain. Meloidogyne arenaria and M. javanica were positively associated with sandy texture (e.g. soil) (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Goodey et al. (1965) list a total of 770 host species or varieties for Meloidogyne javanica, including many weeds as well as crop plants. In addition to those crops in the list of hosts, there are many others of economic importance, including tea, grapevine, many vegetables, fruit trees, cereals and ornamentals (cited from CABI, 2021).
Eggs and juveniles can be transported with soil, so anything which has soil attached is a potential pathway including agricultural equipment and containers, tools, vehicle tires, and workers clothing or boots (CABI, 2021). The nematodes can also be transported by water; down river flooded fields can become infected (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Meloidogyne spp. are not transmitted with seeds (in Wesemael et al., 2011).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
Although Meloidogyne is considered worldwide as the most important genus of plant-parasitic nematodes,
information in the scientific literature on the economic impact of root-knot nematodes in Europe is scarce (Wesemael et al., 2011).
The four major Meloidogyne species, M. incognita, M. javanica, M. arenaria, and M. hapla can cause economic damage to stone fruits (Marull et al., 1992) and yield losses (McKenry, 2004) in different parts of the world. Root-knot nematodes cause a 15% loss in vigour and yield of Prunus crops (nurseries and orchards) on a worldwide basis. The economic importance of Meloidogyne spp. to stone fruits was shown with the use of nematicides and rootstocks with nematode resistance. Sharpe et al. (1993) showed that pre-plant fumigation with methyl bromide to control Meloidogyne spp. in peaches increased the cumulative yield over 3 seasons by 2535Kg per hectare. Nematicides have been used to increase yield on many different crops. In Libya, 2000 peach seedlings died when planted into soil heavily infested with M. javanica. The total loss to three nurseries during 1979-1980 was estimated at 115500 Libyan Dinars (Siddiqi, 1982). Meloidogyne javanica is economically important to almond production. In Libya, economic loss of almond seedlings from root-knot nematodes was estimated at 330,000 Libyan Dinars (Siddiqi, 1982).
In Mediterranean and warm temperate climates, the perennial crops most affected by root-knot nematode species include Prunus spp. and, to a lesser extent fig (Ficus carica) (Saucet et al., 2016).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Medium

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
No

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
For most Prunus spp., root-stocks resistant against root knot nematodes are available (Saucet et al., 2016); however, the Fruit SEWG considered that these rootstocks are only rarely used. The economic impact is rated as Medium in absence of resistant rootstocks.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Rootstocks with a wide resistance spectrum for Meloidogyne spp. have been developed using the Myrobalan plum, P. cerasifera, as a parental (Saucet et al., 2016).
Use of clean soil: The propagation material is kept either in containers of sterilized growing medium or in soil that has been tested and found free from Xiphinema diversicaudatum (see EPPO Standard PM4/35), Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita, M. javanica, Pratylenchus vulnus and Verticillium dahlia (EPPO 2022)
Woody crops are generally grown in long-term specialized production systems that remain in place for decades. It is not possible, therefore, to control polyphagous root-knot nematode species by crop rotation (Saucet et al., 2016).

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Recommended for listing as an RNQP based on data.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
No

Proposed Risk management measure:
 

Justification (if necessary):
 
The Fruit SEWG discussed how visual examination should be performed in a nursery: although random inspection of the roots of asymptomatic plants for this nematode is better (i.e. uprooting some asymptomatic plants), some countries considered that it would have an unacceptable economic impact and recommended that root examination is only performed following suspicions.

REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2021). Meloidogyne incognita (root-knot nematode) (accessed 2/May/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.33245
  • Candido V, Miccolis V, Basile M, D Addabbo T & Gatta G (2005). Soil solarization for the control of Meloidogyne javanica on eggplant in Southern Italy. Acta horticulturae, 698, 195-200.
  • Clavero-Camacho I, Archidona-Yuste A, Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C, Castillo P & Palomares-Rius JE (2024) Prevalence and ecological factors affecting the distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in Prunus groves in Spain Journal of Integrative Agriculture 23(2), 566–589.
  • Duval H, Van Ghelder C, Portier U, Confolent C, Meza P & Esmenjaud D (2019). New Data Completing the Spectrum of the Ma, RMia, and RMja Genes for Resistance to Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Prunus. Phytopathology 109(4):615-622. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-05-18-0173-R
  • EPPO (2022) PM 4/17 (3) Certification scheme for olive trees and rootstocks. EPPO Bulletin 52, 590–60. DOI: 10.1111/epp.1288
  • Gonçalves AR, Conceição IL, Kormpi M & Tzortzakakis EA (2020). Lavandula angustifolia and Oxalis pes-caprae, hosts of Meloidogyne hapla and Meloidogyne javanica - A note for Meloidogyne luci in Greece. Hellenic Plant Protection Journal 13(2), 78-82. https://sciendo.com/pl/article/10.2478/hppj-2020-0008?content-tab=abstract.
  • Goodey JB, Franklin MT, Hooper DJ (1965). T. Goodey's the nematode parasites of plants catalogued under their hosts. 3rd. ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
  • Maleita C, Santos D, Abrantes I & Esteves I (2022). First report of root knot nematodes Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica parasitizing sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas, in Portugal. Plant Disease 106(9), 2536.
  • Marull J, Pinochet J, Felipe A & Cenis JL (1994) Resistance verification in Prunus selections to a mixture of thirteen Meloidogyne isolates and resistance mechanisms of a peach-almond hybrid to M. javanica. Fundamental and Applied Nematology 17(1), pp.85-92.
  • McKenry MV (2004) Three nematode genera and the damage they cause for plum producers. Journal of Nematology 36(3), p.333.
  • Philis J, 1983. Occurrence of Meloidogyne spp. and races on the island of Cyprus. Nematologia Mediterranea 11(1), 13-19.
  • Samaliev HY, Salkova DS, Baycheva OTs, Zinovieva SV & Udalova ZhV (2018) Investigations of the root-knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne (Goeldi, 1887) on the territories of Bulgaria and Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Parasitology 12(4), 94–98. DOI: 10.31016/1998-8435-2018-12-4-94-9
  • Saucet SB, Van Ghelder C, Abad P, Duval H & Esmenjaud D9 (2016) Resistance to root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp. in woody plants. New Phytologist (2016) 211: 41–56. doi: 10.1111/nph.13933
  • Sharpe RR, Pusey PL, Nyczepir AP & Florkowski WJ (1993) Yield and economics of intervention with peach tree short life disease. Journal of production agriculture 6(2), pp.241-244.
  • Siddiqi ZA (1982) Nematode problems in fruit tree nurseries in Libya. The Libyan Journal of Agriculture 11(1).
  • Simeone AM & Di Vito M (1990) Reactions to nematodes of selections of peach rootstocks. Peach, XXIII IHC 315, pp.197-202.
  • Terlidou MC (1974). Effect of root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica (Treub) Chitwood in vine nurseries. Vitis, 12, 316-319.
  • Toth F, Bogdányi FT, Petrikovszki R, Gódor A, Zalai M, Balint B, Sunder P & Myrta, A. (2019). Control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita and weeds in protected cucumber with dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) over two crop cycles: The first results in Hungary. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 54(2), 267-278.
  • Wesemael W, Viaene N & Moens M. (2011). Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Europe. Nematology 13(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1163/138855410X526831

HOST PLANT N°12: Pyrus (1PYUG) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
M. incognita is only mentioned in PM4/017(3) olive trees and rootstocks, not in the PM4 certification schemes available for all Prunus spp. and pome fruits. These schemes post-date the first mentioning of M. javanica in Europe. However, these certification schemes require that nuclear stock is produced in sterilized growing medium

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

 
Justification:
 
Main transmission mode - in addition to plants for planting - is soil (EPPO, 2022; PM4/017)
Meloidogyne arenaria, M. javanica and M. incognita are the most common species in warmer conditions of southern Europe, but also in glasshouses in northern Europe (Wesemael et al., 2011) e.g. Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica are the most predominant root-knot nematodes in Spain. Meloidogyne arenaria and M. javanica were positively associated with sandy texture (e.g. soil) (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Goodey et al. (1965) list a total of 770 host species or varieties for Meloidogyne javanica, including many weeds as well as crop plants. In addition to those crops in the list of hosts, there are many others of economic importance, including tea, grapevine, many vegetables, fruit trees, cereals and ornamentals (cited from CABI, 2021).
Eggs and juveniles can be transported with soil, so anything which has soil attached is a potential pathway including agricultural equipment and containers, tools, vehicle tires, and workers clothing or boots (CABI, 2021). The nematodes can also be transported by water; down river flooded fields can become infected (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Meloidogyne spp. are not transmitted with seeds (in Wesemael et al., 2011).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
No

Justification:
 
Although Meloidogyne is considered worldwide as the most important genus of plant-parasitic nematodes, information in the scientific literature on the economic impact of root-knot nematodes in Europe is scarce (Wesemael et al., 2011).
In Mediterranean and warm temperate climates, the perennial crops most affected by root-knot nematode species include Prunus spp. and, to a lesser extent, fig (Ficus carica) (Saucet et al., 2016).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

Justification:
 

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: there are no evidence of economic impact in the EU on this host plant.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • CABI (2021). Meloidogyne incognita (root-knot nematode) (accessed 2/May/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.33245
  • Candido V, Miccolis V, Basile M, D Addabbo T & Gatta G (2005). Soil solarization for the control of Meloidogyne javanica on eggplant in Southern Italy. Acta horticulturae, 698, 195-200.
  • Clavero-Camacho I, Archidona-Yuste A, Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C, Castillo P & Palomares-Rius JE (2024) Prevalence and ecological factors affecting the distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in Prunus groves in Spain Journal of Integrative Agriculture 23(2), 566–589.
  • Duval H, Van Ghelder C, Portier U, Confolent C, Meza P & Esmenjaud D (2019). New Data Completing the Spectrum of the Ma, RMia, and RMja Genes for Resistance to Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Prunus. Phytopathology 109(4):615-622. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-05-18-0173-R
  • EPPO (2022) PM 4/17 (3) Certification scheme for olive trees and rootstocks. EPPO Bulletin 52, 590–60. DOI: 10.1111/epp.1288
  • Gonçalves AR, Conceição IL, Kormpi M & Tzortzakakis EA (2020). Lavandula angustifolia and Oxalis pes-caprae, hosts of Meloidogyne hapla and Meloidogyne javanica - A note for Meloidogyne luci in Greece. Hellenic Plant Protection Journal 13(2), 78-82. https://sciendo.com/pl/article/10.2478/hppj-2020-0008?content-tab=abstract.
  • Goodey JB, Franklin MT, Hooper DJ (1965). T. Goodey's the nematode parasites of plants catalogued under their hosts. 3rd. ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
  • Maleita C, Santos D, Abrantes I & Esteves I (2022). First report of root knot nematodes Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica parasitizing sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas, in Portugal. Plant Disease 106(9), 2536.
  • Philis J, 1983. Occurrence of Meloidogyne spp. and races on the island of Cyprus. Nematologia Mediterranea 11(1), 13-19.
  • Samaliev HY, Salkova DS, Baycheva OTs, Zinovieva SV & Udalova ZhV (2018) Investigations of the root-knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne (Goeldi, 1887) on the territories of Bulgaria and Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Parasitology 12(4), 94–98. DOI: 10.31016/1998-8435-2018-12-4-94-9
  • Saucet SB, Van Ghelder C, Abad P, Duval H & Esmenjaud D9 (2016) Resistance to root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp. in woody plants. New Phytologist (2016) 211: 41–56. doi: 10.1111/nph.13933
  • Terlidou MC (1974). Effect of root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica (Treub) Chitwood in vine nurseries. Vitis, 12, 316-319.
  • Toth F, Bogdányi FT, Petrikovszki R, Gódor A, Zalai M, Balint B, Sunder P & Myrta, A. (2019). Control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita and weeds in protected cucumber with dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) over two crop cycles: The first results in Hungary. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 54(2), 267-278.
  • Wesemael W, Viaene N & Moens M. (2011). Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Europe. Nematology 13(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1163/138855410X526831