| Legend |
|---|
| Justification for qualification based on EPPO PM 4 Standards |
| Justification for disqualification |
| Additional or non-conclusive information |
| Standard text |
NAME OF THE ORGANISM: Meloidogyne incognita (MELGIN)
GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE PEST
Name as submitted in the project specification (if different):
Pest category:
Nematoda
1- Identity of the pest/Level of taxonomic listing:
Is the organism clearly a single taxonomic entity and can it be adequately distinguished from other entities of the same rank?
Yes
Is the pest defined at the species level or lower?:
Yes
Can listing of the pest at a taxonomic level higher than species be supported by scientific reasons or can species be identified within the taxonomic rank which are the (main) pests of concern?
- Not relevant: Fruits (including hops) sector
If necessary, please list the species:
-
Is it justified that the pest is listed at a taxonomic rank below species level?
Not relevant
Conclusion:
- Candidate: Fruits (including hops) sector
Justification (if necessary):
-
2 – Status in the EU:
Is this pest already a quarantine pest for the whole EU?
No
Presence in the EU:
Yes
List of countries (EPPO Global Database):
-
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification (if necessary):
Meloidogyne incognita is reported in Belgium (2019), Bulgaria (Samaliev et al., 2018), Croatia (Ivezic et al., 1994), Cyprus (Philis, 1983), Czech Republic (Tesařová et al., 2003), France (Gautier, 1975; Duval et al., 2019), Greece (Tzortzakakis et al., 2011), Hungary (Toth et al., 2019), Netherlands (Zijlstra et al., 2000), Portugal (Maleita et al., 2022), Romania (Boroş et al., 2015), Slovakia (Lišková et al., 2007), Slovenia (Širca et al., 2004), Spain (Nico et al., 2003)
HOST PLANT N°1: Ficus carica (FIUCA) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.
Origin of the listing:
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072
Plants for planting:
Plants intended for planting
3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
No
Conclusion:
Evaluation continues
Justification (if necessary):
No PM4 for Ficus carica. Remark: M. incognita is only mentioned in PM4/017(3) olive trees and rootstocks, not in the PM4 certification schemes available for all Prunus spp. These schemes post-date the first mentioning of M. incognita in Europe. However, PM 4 certification schemes for Prunus spp. require that the higher grades are produced in sterilized growing medium.
4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
Yes
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification:
Main transmission modes (in addition to plants for planting) is through soil (EPPO, 2022; PM4/017)
Meloidogyne arenaria, M. javanica and M. incognita are the most common species in warmer conditions of southern Europe, but also in glasshouses in northern Europe (Wesemael et al., 2011).
Meloidogyne incognita is probably the most widely distributed and economically important species of plant parasitic nematode in tropical and subtropical regions. Two-thirds of the root-knot nematode samples obtained from a number of tropical countries were of M. incognita (Sasser, 1979). In India alone, 232 plant genera have been reported as hosts to M. incognita (Krishnappa, 1985) and worldwide the species is a parasite of a wide range of crop plants (cited from CABI, 2021).
Eggs and juveniles can travel with soil, so anything which has soil attached is a potential pathway including agricultural equipment and containers, tools, vehicle tires, and workers clothing or boots (CABI, 2021). The nematodes can also be transported by water; down river flooded fields can become infected (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Meloidogyne spp. are not transmitted with seeds (in Wesemael et al., 2011).
Meloidogyne arenaria, M. javanica and M. incognita are the most common species in warmer conditions of southern Europe, but also in glasshouses in northern Europe (Wesemael et al., 2011).
Meloidogyne incognita is probably the most widely distributed and economically important species of plant parasitic nematode in tropical and subtropical regions. Two-thirds of the root-knot nematode samples obtained from a number of tropical countries were of M. incognita (Sasser, 1979). In India alone, 232 plant genera have been reported as hosts to M. incognita (Krishnappa, 1985) and worldwide the species is a parasite of a wide range of crop plants (cited from CABI, 2021).
Eggs and juveniles can travel with soil, so anything which has soil attached is a potential pathway including agricultural equipment and containers, tools, vehicle tires, and workers clothing or boots (CABI, 2021). The nematodes can also be transported by water; down river flooded fields can become infected (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Meloidogyne spp. are not transmitted with seeds (in Wesemael et al., 2011).
5 - Economic impact:
Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
Yes
Justification:
Although Meloidogyne is considered worldwide as the most important genus of plant-parasitic nematodes, information in the scientific literature on the economic impact of root-knot nematodes in Europe is scarce (Wesemael et al., 2011).
In Mediterranean and warm temperate climates, the perennial crops most affected by root-knot nematode species include Prunus spp. and, to a lesser extent fig (Ficus carica) (Saucet et al., 2016).
In fig trees, root-knot nematodes are reported to cause reduction in growth and yield. Heavily infected roots may die (CABI, 2022). In Spain, practical experience from the field shows that Meloidogyne species cause considerable damage in all areas where this fruit tree is grown. In Extremadura, the species M. arenaria has been identified. There is currently no authorised nematicide against these pathogenic nematodes, so they must be controlled by solarisation or biofumigation (Casadomet et al., 2015).
Meloidogyne is also considered as a yield- and production-limiting pest of fig in Brazil (Sherb, 1993). Species associated with this crop around the world include M. arenaria, M. javanica and M. incognita (McSorley 1981), the latter in higher frequency. The presence of this nematode in the crop also affected commercial production in the past in the United States i(Knight Jr 1980), France (Scotto La Massèse et al. 1984) and Brasil (Ferraz et al. 1982, Campos 1997), countries with the highest yields in the world (references in Perraza-Padilla et al., 2013).
These nematodes are also one of the limiting factors for the cultivation of fig in India where it caused considerable yield losses (Jagdev and Mhase, 2019). Jagdev and Mhase (2019) conducted a field experiment to assess the yield losses due to M. incognita in fig (cv. Poona). Their results indicated that the loss in yield of fig in untreated trees ranged from 16.57 to 31.60%.
In Mediterranean and warm temperate climates, the perennial crops most affected by root-knot nematode species include Prunus spp. and, to a lesser extent fig (Ficus carica) (Saucet et al., 2016).
In fig trees, root-knot nematodes are reported to cause reduction in growth and yield. Heavily infected roots may die (CABI, 2022). In Spain, practical experience from the field shows that Meloidogyne species cause considerable damage in all areas where this fruit tree is grown. In Extremadura, the species M. arenaria has been identified. There is currently no authorised nematicide against these pathogenic nematodes, so they must be controlled by solarisation or biofumigation (Casadomet et al., 2015).
Meloidogyne is also considered as a yield- and production-limiting pest of fig in Brazil (Sherb, 1993). Species associated with this crop around the world include M. arenaria, M. javanica and M. incognita (McSorley 1981), the latter in higher frequency. The presence of this nematode in the crop also affected commercial production in the past in the United States i(Knight Jr 1980), France (Scotto La Massèse et al. 1984) and Brasil (Ferraz et al. 1982, Campos 1997), countries with the highest yields in the world (references in Perraza-Padilla et al., 2013).
These nematodes are also one of the limiting factors for the cultivation of fig in India where it caused considerable yield losses (Jagdev and Mhase, 2019). Jagdev and Mhase (2019) conducted a field experiment to assess the yield losses due to M. incognita in fig (cv. Poona). Their results indicated that the loss in yield of fig in untreated trees ranged from 16.57 to 31.60%.
What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
Medium
Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
No
Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification:
For Ficus carica no effective control strategy based on resistance has yet been implemented, although Ficus racemose seems to be highly resistant and is graft compatible (Saucet et al., 2016).
6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
Yes
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification:
Use of clean soil: The propagation material is kept either in containers of sterilized growing medium or in soil that has been tested and found free from Xiphinema diversicaudatum (see EPPO Standard PM4/35), Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita, M. javanica, Pratylenchus vulnus and Verticillium dahlia (EPPO 2022)
7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
Conclusion:
Justification:
CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
Recommended for listing as an RNQP based on data.
8 - Tolerance level:
Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
No
Proposed Tolerance levels:
9 - Risk management measures:
Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
No
Proposed Risk management measure:
Justification (if necessary):
The Fruit SEWG discussed how visual examination should be performed in a nursery: although random inspection of the roots of asymptomatic plants for this nematode is better (i.e. uprooting some asymptomatic plants), some countries considered that it would have an unacceptable economic impact and recommended that root examination is only performed following suspicions.
REFERENCES:
- Biondić R, Puškarić T, Gerič Stare B & Brmež M (2023). The status of root-knot nematodes of the Meloidogyne genus in Croatia, with a special reference to the quarantine species. Poljoprivreda 29(1), 27-34.
- Boroş L, Şesan TE, Chifiriuc MC, Dobrin I, Iacomi B & Costache C (2015) The incidence and prevalence of root-knot nematode species (Meloidogyne spp.) associated with different dicotyledons originated from two vegetable cropped areas, Vărăşti (Giurgiu), and Băleni (Dâmboviţa). Scientific Papers. Series B, Horticulture. Vol. LIX.
- CABI (2021). Meloidogyne incognita (root-knot nematode). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.33245
- CABI (2022) The Fig. Botany, production and uses. CAB International. ISBN-13:978 1 78924 289 8.
- Casadomet E, López Corrales M, Pérez Gragera F, Senero M, Pérez Ross J & Del Moral J (2015) Parásitos, patógenos y fisiopatías de la higuera. Phytoma, 271: 30-39.
- Clavero-Camacho I, Archidona-Yuste A, Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C, Castillo P & Palomares-Rius JE (2024) Prevalence and ecological factors affecting the distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in Prunus groves in Spain Journal of Integrative Agriculture 23(2), 566–589.
- Duval H, Van Ghelder C, Portier U, Confolent C, Meza P & Esmenjaud D (2019). New Data Completing the Spectrum of the Ma, RMia, and RMja Genes for Resistance to Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Prunus. Phytopathology 109(4):615-622. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-05-18-0173-R
- EPPO (2022) PM 4/17 (3) Certification scheme for olive trees and rootstocks. EPPO Bulletin 52, 590–60. DOI: 10.1111/epp.1288
- Gautier M (1975). Nematodes in fruit tree nurseries. (Les nematodes en arboriculture fruitière.). Arboriculture fruitière 252, 17-25.
- Ivezic M, Samota D & Raspudic E (1994). Plant‐parasitic nematodes of Croatia. EPPO Bulletin 24(2), 369-373.
- Jagdev GH, Mhase NL (2019) Assessment of avoidable yield losses due to root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita infesting fig under field conditions. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 7(6), 274-277.
- Jones JT, Haegeman A, Danchin EGJ, Gaur HS, Helder J, Jones MGK, Kikuchi T, Manzanilla-López R, Palomares-Rius JE, Wesemael WML & Perry RN (2013) Top 10 plant-parasitic nematodes in molecular plant pathology. Molecular Plant Pathology 14 (9), 946-961.
- Krishnappa K (1985) Nematology in developing countries: India - IMP Region VIII. In An Advanced Treatise on Meloidogyne. Vol.I. Biology and Control (eds Sasser JN &Carter CC). Raleigh, North Carolina State Graphics, 379- 398.
- Lišková M, Sasanelli N & D’Addabbo T (2007) Some notes on the occurrence of plant parasitic nematodes on fruit trees in Slovakia. Plant Protect. Sci. 43: 26-32.
- Maleita C, Santos D, Abrantes I & Esteves I (2022). First report of root knot nematodes Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica parasitizing sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas, in Portugal. Plant Disease 106(9), 2536.
- Nguyen HT, Trinh QP, Couvreur M, Singh PR, Decraemer W & Bert W (2019). First report of Scutellonema brachyurus (Steiner, 1938) Andrassy, 1958 and occurrence of Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949 in Belgium. Journal of Nematology, 51. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909387/pdf/jofnem-51-062.pdf
- Nico AI, Jiménez‐Díaz RM & Castillo P (2003). Solarization of soil in piles for the control of Meloidogyne incognita in olive nurseries in southern Spain. Plant Pathology 52(6), 770-778.
- Perraza-Padilla W, Rosales-Flores J., Esquivel-Hernández A, Hilje-Rodríguez I, Molina-Bravo R & Castillo-Castillo P (2013).Identificación morfológica, morfométrica y molecular de Meloidogyne incógnita en higuera (Ficus carica L.) en Costa Rica. Agronomía Mesoamericana 24(2), 337-346.
- Philis J, 1983. Occurrence of Meloidogyne spp. and races on the island of Cyprus. Nematologia Mediterranea 11(1), 13-19.
- Sasser JN (1979). Economic importance of Meloidogyne in tropical countries. In Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne species), Systematics, Biology and Control (Eds Lamberti F & Taylor CE). London, UK: Academic Press, 359-374.
- Samaliev HY, Salkova DS, Baycheva OTs, Zinovieva SV & Udalova ZhV (2018) Investigations of the root-knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne (Goeldi, 1887) on the territories of Bulgaria and Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Parasitology 12(4), 94–98. DOI: 10.31016/1998-8435-2018-12-4-94-9.
- Saucet SB, Van Ghelder C, Abad P, Duval H & Esmenjaud D9 (2016) Resistance to root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp. in woody plants. New Phytologist (2016) 211: 41–56. doi: 10.1111/nph.13933
- Širca S, Urek G, & Karssen G (2004). The incidence of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita and Meloidogyne hapla in Slovenia. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 83, 15-22.
- Tesařová B, Zouhar M & Ryšánek P (2003) Development of PCR for specific determination of root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Plant Protection Science 39 (1), 23-28.
- Toth F, Bogdányi FT, Petrikovszki R, Gódor A, Zalai M, Balint B, Sunder P & Myrta, A. (2019). Control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita and weeds in protected cucumber with dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) over two crop cycles: The first results in Hungary. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 54(2), 267-278.
- Tzortzakakis AE, Conceicao ILPM da, Santos MCV dos & Abrantes IM de O (2011) Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Greece. Hellenic Plant Protection Journal 4: 25-30.
- Wesemael W, Viaene N & Moens M. (2011). Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Europe. Nematology 13(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1163/138855410X526831
- Zijlstra C, Donkers-Venne DT & Fargette M (2000). Identification of Meloidogyne incognita, M. javanica and M. arenaria using sequence characterised amplified region (SCAR) based PCR assays. Nematology, 2(8), 847-853.
HOST PLANT N°2: Olea europaea (OLVEU) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.
Origin of the listing:
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072
Plants for planting:
Plants intended for planting
3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
Yes
Conclusion:
Qualified
Justification (if necessary):
EPPO Standard PM 4/17 Certification scheme for olive trees and rootstock recommends using sterilized growing medium or soil tested and found free from Meloidogyne incognita. Full assessment of the RNQP status of M. incognita, together with M. javanica, was performed in 2021/2022 in the context of the revision of EPPO Standard PM 4/17. The RNQP status was considered justified by olive certification experts.
4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
Yes
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification:
The root knot nematode M. incognita is known to infect olive trees. Plant parasitic nematodes move only short distances and, thus their dissemination can occur via water, wind and human activities such as the introduction of infected planting material or diffusion of infested soil with nursery practices.
Hamza et al. (2017) and Nico et al. (2002) suggested that the use of infected rooted plantlets was one of the likely major sources of root-knot nematode inoculum in the field. In Spain, a study in olive nurseries reported a high-percentage of root-knot nematodes in infected plantlets [Meloidogyne incognita (14.7%), M. javanica (11.2%), and M. arenaria (2.7%)] (Nico et al., 2002).
These nematodes occur in sporadic distributions in established orchards. Notably, three major parameters drive the distribution of Meloidogyne spp. in cultivated olives: cover vegetation on alley, irrigation and soil texture; but different species respond differently to them. In particular the presence of M. incognita is highly correlated with sandy loamy soils, the presence of M. javanica with irrigated soils and cover vegetation, while the presence of M. arenaria is correlated with the absence of cover vegetation on alley and absence of irrigation. These parameters likely influence the selection of each particular Meloidogyne species from a major dispersal source, such as the rooted plantlets used to establish the orchards (Archidona-Yuste et al., 2018).
Different management measures allow to reduce the importance of other pathways than plants for planting such as the use of new pest-free production sites to establish the planting material, management via soil disinfestation with fumigants prior to planting, soil solarization, use of special amendments (biofumigation), establishment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant root systems (to protect plants against soilborne diseases through improvement of phosphorus (P) absorption), direct competition etc., the use of good practices to avoid moving soils between different production sites etc. (Castillo et al., 2010). Taking all these measures into consideration, plants for planting is considered to be a major pathway compared to others.
Hamza et al. (2017) and Nico et al. (2002) suggested that the use of infected rooted plantlets was one of the likely major sources of root-knot nematode inoculum in the field. In Spain, a study in olive nurseries reported a high-percentage of root-knot nematodes in infected plantlets [Meloidogyne incognita (14.7%), M. javanica (11.2%), and M. arenaria (2.7%)] (Nico et al., 2002).
These nematodes occur in sporadic distributions in established orchards. Notably, three major parameters drive the distribution of Meloidogyne spp. in cultivated olives: cover vegetation on alley, irrigation and soil texture; but different species respond differently to them. In particular the presence of M. incognita is highly correlated with sandy loamy soils, the presence of M. javanica with irrigated soils and cover vegetation, while the presence of M. arenaria is correlated with the absence of cover vegetation on alley and absence of irrigation. These parameters likely influence the selection of each particular Meloidogyne species from a major dispersal source, such as the rooted plantlets used to establish the orchards (Archidona-Yuste et al., 2018).
Different management measures allow to reduce the importance of other pathways than plants for planting such as the use of new pest-free production sites to establish the planting material, management via soil disinfestation with fumigants prior to planting, soil solarization, use of special amendments (biofumigation), establishment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant root systems (to protect plants against soilborne diseases through improvement of phosphorus (P) absorption), direct competition etc., the use of good practices to avoid moving soils between different production sites etc. (Castillo et al., 2010). Taking all these measures into consideration, plants for planting is considered to be a major pathway compared to others.
5 - Economic impact:
Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
Yes
Justification:
The root knot nematodes M. arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica are known to damage cultivated olive trees, especially in nurseries where optimum irrigation conditions favour root proliferation and increased nematode population, and which have been shown to be more susceptible than older plants (Castillo et al., 2010; Ali et al., 2014). Pathogenicity assays under controlled environmental conditions demonstrated the potential of M. arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica to damage olive rootstocks as well as self-rooted olive cultivars (Castillo et al., 2010). Meloidogyne sp. cause heavy root galling on olive trees, distorted feeder roots as well as plant growth retardation. At low infection levels, no disease symptoms are observed on the stems or leaves of nematode-infected planting stocks as compared with non-infected ones (Nico et al., 2002). On specific cultivars, e.g. Picual (one of the olive cultivars most extensively grown in the Mediterranean Basin), these nematodes can show a distinct yellowing affecting the uppermost leaves followed by partial defoliation (Castillo et al., 2010; Ali et al., 2014). Controlled experiments showed that root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne (e.g., M. arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica) may be responsible for 5 to 10% crop losses, while the damage is often difficult to assign to plant parasitic nematodes (Ali et al., 2014). Studies on the pathogenicity of Meloidogyne spp. to olives suggest that main stem diameter is a highly sensitive parameter for assessing damage caused by M. arenaria and M. javanica (Castillo et al., 2010).
In Argentina, the etiology of a generalized olive drying syndrome (designated “seca”) was attributed to a disease complex involving M. javanica and several species of the soilborne fungus Fusarium, although a causal relationship has not been established (Castillo et al., 2010).
Indirect root damages are also reported to be related to nematode infection, whose penetration opens pathways to other soilborne pathogens (bacteria, fungi). The best example is the association of plant pathogenic nematodes such as M. incognita with the fungal pathogen Verticillium dahliae (Verticillium wilt). The presence of nematodes enhances the symptoms induced by the fungus (Ali et al., 2014).
In Argentina, the etiology of a generalized olive drying syndrome (designated “seca”) was attributed to a disease complex involving M. javanica and several species of the soilborne fungus Fusarium, although a causal relationship has not been established (Castillo et al., 2010).
Indirect root damages are also reported to be related to nematode infection, whose penetration opens pathways to other soilborne pathogens (bacteria, fungi). The best example is the association of plant pathogenic nematodes such as M. incognita with the fungal pathogen Verticillium dahliae (Verticillium wilt). The presence of nematodes enhances the symptoms induced by the fungus (Ali et al., 2014).
What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
Medium in nurseries (but appears to be lower in orchards)
Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
No
Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification:
Damage to established olive orchards by nematode parasitism may not be clearly perceived because olive is an extremely vigorous plant able to thrive in relatively dry areas, which may obscure expression of symptoms from nematode attacks. However, modern olive production is based largely on the establishment of new high-input orchards intended to increase yields while reducing the time for investment recovery. This model, broadly adopted in new olive-producing areas of the Southern Hemisphere and the Mediterranean Basin, creates an environment conducive to diseases caused by or involving nematodes (Ali et al., 2014). The economic importance of these nematodes in olive cultivation has also increased in recent years because most chemical agents for the control of plant-parasitic nematodes have been banned due to environmental and health concerns (Castillo et al., 2010).
6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
Yes
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification:
The appropriate application of exclusion principles should lead to nematode-free nursery stock. Disinfestation of soil by any means cannot achieve total nematode control. The use of potting mixtures that are not fully disinfested reduces nematological risk, but could mask the presence of pathogen nematodes in seemingly healthy stock (Castillo et al., 2010).
7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
Yes
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification:
CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
Recommended for listing as an RNQP, based on EPPO PM4 Standards and data.
8 - Tolerance level:
Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
No
Proposed Tolerance levels:
9 - Risk management measures:
Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
No
Proposed Risk management measure:
Justification (if necessary):
The Fruit SEWG discussed how visual examination should be performed in a nursery: although random inspection of the roots of asymptomatic plants for this nematode is better (i.e. uprooting some asymptomatic plants), some countries considered that it would have an unacceptable economic impact and recommended that root examination is only performed following suspicions.
REFERENCES:
- Aït Hamza M, Ali N, Tavoillot J, Fossati-Gaschignard O, Boubaker H, El Mousadik A & Mateille T (2017) Diversity of root-knot nematodes in Moroccan olive nurseries and orchards: does Meloidogyne javanica disperse according to invasion processes? BMC Ecology 17, 1-13. Available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-017-0153-9
- Ali N, Chapuis E, Tavoillot J & Mateille T (2014) Plant-parasitic nematodes associated with olive tree (Olea europaea L.) with a focus on the Mediterranean Basin: a review. Comptes Rendus Biologies 337, 423–442. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2014.05.006
- Archidona-Yuste A, Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C, LieÂbanas G, Rapoport HF, Castillo P & Palomares-Rius JE (2018) Diversity of root-knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne, 1892 (Nematoda: Meloidogynidae) associated with olive plants and environmental cues regarding their distribution in southern Spain. PLoS ONE 13, e0198236. Available at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
- Castillo P, Nico AI, Navas-Cortés JA, Landa BB, Jimenez-Diaz RM & Vovlas N (2010) Plant-parasitic nematodes attacking olive trees and their management. Plant Disease 94, 148–162.
- Nico A, Rapoport HF, Jiménez-Diaz RM & Castillo P (2002) Incidence and population density of plant-parasitic
- nematodes associated with olive planting stocks at nurseries in southern Spain. Plant Disease 86, 1075–1079.
