| Legend |
|---|
| Justification for qualification based on EPPO PM 4 Standards |
| Justification for disqualification |
| Additional or non-conclusive information |
| Standard text |
NAME OF THE ORGANISM: Pratylenchus penetrans (PRATPE)
GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE PEST
Name as submitted in the project specification (if different):
Pest category:
Nematoda
1- Identity of the pest/Level of taxonomic listing:
Is the organism clearly a single taxonomic entity and can it be adequately distinguished from other entities of the same rank?
Yes
Is the pest defined at the species level or lower?:
Yes
Can listing of the pest at a taxonomic level higher than species be supported by scientific reasons or can species be identified within the taxonomic rank which are the (main) pests of concern?
- Not relevant: Fruits (including hops) sector
If necessary, please list the species:
-
Is it justified that the pest is listed at a taxonomic rank below species level?
Not relevant
Conclusion:
- Candidate: Fruits (including hops) sector
Justification (if necessary):
-
2 – Status in the EU:
Is this pest already a quarantine pest for the whole EU?
No
Presence in the EU:
Yes
List of countries (EPPO Global Database):
Belgium (2003); Bulgaria (2003); Cyprus (2011); Czech Republic (2003); Denmark (2003); Estonia (2003); France (2003); Germany (2003); Greece (2003); Hungary (2003); Italy (2003); Netherlands (2003); Poland (2012); Portugal (2020); Romania (2003); Slovakia (2003); Spain (2003); Sweden (2003)
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification (if necessary):
Pratylenchus penetrans is cosmopolitan but mainly found in temperate regions, whereas Pratylenchus vulnus is present mostly on woody plants in warmer (subtropical and Mediterranean) climates in different continents (Moens & Perry, 2009). Data of the presence of this pest on the EU territory are available in EPPO Global Database (https://gd.eppo.int/).
HOST PLANT N°1: Fragaria (1FRAG) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.
Origin of the listing:
New proposal from the Spanish expert
Plants for planting:
Plants intended for planting
3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
No
Conclusion:
Evaluation continues
4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
Yes
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification:
Pratylenchus penetrans is cosmopolitan and has more than 350 hosts including woody plants (e.g., fruit trees, roses) and herbaceous plants (e.g., potato, vegetables) (Moens & Perry, 2009, CABI, 2021), e.g., Malus is a good host for Pratylenchus penetrans (aaltjesschema, 2019). Also Pyrus spp., Cydonia oblonga, Pistacia vera and many Prunus spp. can be hosts of P. penetrans (Hoekstra & Oostenbrink, 1962; Askary et al., 2012; Merrifield, 2000). Ficus carica is not mentioned as hosts and information of Pratylenchus penetrans on Pistacia vera is scarce (PlantwisePlus Knowledge Bank, 2023; Fatemy, 2009), this could be linked to P. penetrans being a nematode from mostly temperate climates and fig and pistachio being more Mediterranean crops. P. penetrans can complete its entire life cycle within the roots of plants.
Pratylenchus spp. are migratory endoparasites that enter the host root for feeding and reproduction and move freely within the tissue. Consequently, they spend much of their life cycle in roots and are found in soil when the host plants are senescing, stressed or diseased, or when their hosts have been ploughed up after harvest (Castillo and Vovlas, 2007).
P. penetrans occurs mostly on sandy and peaty soil. The transport of infected plants or those growing in infested soils is one of the principal means by which these nematodes are disseminated (Lehman, 1994; Anonymous, 1999). Bare-rooted plants are often contaminated by soil particles which may contain nematodes. Roots can host endoparasitic nematodes that are not removed by washing treatments (Lehman, 1994). In this context, it is essential that the plant propagation material be free of this pathogen (Allen, 1949). Because it can survive in soil, it can be dispersed by land vehicles etc.; within a field by cultivation, and can be introduced to non-infested sites by poorly sanitized farm equipment. However, measures (including hygiene) can limit the importance of such alternative pathways.
Considering the numerous bibliographic references that highlight the importance of plants for planting as an important pathway, and the existence of measures that can reduce the role of the others reported pathways, host plants for planting with roots, with or without soil or growing media, are a considered as a main pathway.
Pratylenchus spp. are migratory endoparasites that enter the host root for feeding and reproduction and move freely within the tissue. Consequently, they spend much of their life cycle in roots and are found in soil when the host plants are senescing, stressed or diseased, or when their hosts have been ploughed up after harvest (Castillo and Vovlas, 2007).
P. penetrans occurs mostly on sandy and peaty soil. The transport of infected plants or those growing in infested soils is one of the principal means by which these nematodes are disseminated (Lehman, 1994; Anonymous, 1999). Bare-rooted plants are often contaminated by soil particles which may contain nematodes. Roots can host endoparasitic nematodes that are not removed by washing treatments (Lehman, 1994). In this context, it is essential that the plant propagation material be free of this pathogen (Allen, 1949). Because it can survive in soil, it can be dispersed by land vehicles etc.; within a field by cultivation, and can be introduced to non-infested sites by poorly sanitized farm equipment. However, measures (including hygiene) can limit the importance of such alternative pathways.
Considering the numerous bibliographic references that highlight the importance of plants for planting as an important pathway, and the existence of measures that can reduce the role of the others reported pathways, host plants for planting with roots, with or without soil or growing media, are a considered as a main pathway.
5 - Economic impact:
Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
Yes
Justification:
Pratylenchus penetrans has been reported as a pathogen for Fragaria in several countries (e.g. United States, Canada, Costa Rica, Israel, Spain) (Anonymous, 1999; Montes et al., 2006; Qing, 2008; Jackson-Ziems, 2016; MAPA, 2019; Talavera et al., 2019; Sandoval-Ruíz et al., 2023).
In Spain, this species is among the main plant pathogenic nematodes in strawberry crops (López-Aranda, 2008; MAPA, 2019; Talavera et al., 2019; Talavera, 2021; De los Santos et al., 2022). Talavera et al. (2019) found it in 20% of the commercial strawberry plantations of Huelva with an abundance range between 3 and 94 nematodes per 100 g of soil.
The pathogenicity of P. penetrans on strawberry plants has been demonstrated under both controlled and field conditions (see references in Bélair et al., 2018). Affected plants show a marked reduction of the root system and several associated non-specific aerial symptoms (dwarfism, chlorosis, wilting, lack of vigour, smaller fruits), sometimes leading to plant death (Montes et al., 2006; MAPA, 2019).
The wounds inflicted in the root system also favors the entry of other pathogens, especially fungi (e.g. Macrophomina phaseolina, Fusarium spp., Verticillim dahliae), causing complex diseases in strawberries (McKinley y Talboys, 1979, MAPA, 2019; Talavera et al., 2021). In fact, P. penetrans is one of the main components of the black root rot (BRR) complex (together with members of the genera Fusarium, Rhizoctonia, Pythium, Cylindrocarpon and Pestalotia) (Montes et al., 2006; López-Aranda, 2008; MAPA, 2019), an important strawberry pathology that, according to some experts, would have an even greater economic impact than crown rot caused by Phytophthora cactorum (López-Aranda, 2008).
In Spain, this species is among the main plant pathogenic nematodes in strawberry crops (López-Aranda, 2008; MAPA, 2019; Talavera et al., 2019; Talavera, 2021; De los Santos et al., 2022). Talavera et al. (2019) found it in 20% of the commercial strawberry plantations of Huelva with an abundance range between 3 and 94 nematodes per 100 g of soil.
The pathogenicity of P. penetrans on strawberry plants has been demonstrated under both controlled and field conditions (see references in Bélair et al., 2018). Affected plants show a marked reduction of the root system and several associated non-specific aerial symptoms (dwarfism, chlorosis, wilting, lack of vigour, smaller fruits), sometimes leading to plant death (Montes et al., 2006; MAPA, 2019).
The wounds inflicted in the root system also favors the entry of other pathogens, especially fungi (e.g. Macrophomina phaseolina, Fusarium spp., Verticillim dahliae), causing complex diseases in strawberries (McKinley y Talboys, 1979, MAPA, 2019; Talavera et al., 2021). In fact, P. penetrans is one of the main components of the black root rot (BRR) complex (together with members of the genera Fusarium, Rhizoctonia, Pythium, Cylindrocarpon and Pestalotia) (Montes et al., 2006; López-Aranda, 2008; MAPA, 2019), an important strawberry pathology that, according to some experts, would have an even greater economic impact than crown rot caused by Phytophthora cactorum (López-Aranda, 2008).
What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
Major
Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
No
Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification:
Its economic impact on Fragaria, both direct and indirect (in association with other pathogens), is well documented.
6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
Yes
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification:
Crop rotation is difficult because of the wide host range of Pratylenchus penetrans, including weeds. Pratylenchus penetrans can propagate well on many crops, sometimes without causing damage (symptomless) (aaltjesschema). Recent research indicated that with proper choice of selected cultivars of cover crops, P. penetrans can be controlled but further breeding efforts are needed. Although some cover crops can reduce the population of Pratylenchus penetrans (Taning et al., 2023). Since many weeds can also be a host, adequate weed control is important (Aaltjesschema, 2019).
Growing Tagetes spp. (e.g. Tagetes patula) can reduce the population considerably (Evenhuis et al., 2004). The authors predicted that strawberries could be grown for about 7 successive years without economic damage due to the root lesion nematode. Pudasaini et al. (2006) showed that Tagetes can reduce P. penetrans exponentially in time under marigold. The effect of marigold was persistent as no increase in P. penetrans densities over the whole soil profile was noticed after two crop cycles of host plants.
Use of clean soil: The propagation material is kept either in containers of sterilized growing medium or in soil that has been tested and found free from various nematodes (e.g. EPPO 2022).
Soil fumigation: dependent on legislation. Preplant soil fumigation does not eradicate nematodes but dramatically reduces nematode numbers. The nematodes return to their original population density (or greater) within 2 or 3 years after planting, but the absence of nematode pressure during the initial years of establishment is critical for trees to develop strong, healthy root systems (Abawi & Mai, 2014). With the progressive phase-out of chemical nematicides such as Aldicarb, Carbofuran, and 1,3-Dichloropropene, the effectiveness and sustainability of current plant-parasitic nematode management strategies remain limited (Barbosa et al., 2022).
Healthy plants: To prevent the introduction of nematode problems, new orchards should be established with trees obtained from reputable nurseries that treat their soils for nematodes (Abawi & Mai, 2014).
Growing Tagetes spp. (e.g. Tagetes patula) can reduce the population considerably (Evenhuis et al., 2004). The authors predicted that strawberries could be grown for about 7 successive years without economic damage due to the root lesion nematode. Pudasaini et al. (2006) showed that Tagetes can reduce P. penetrans exponentially in time under marigold. The effect of marigold was persistent as no increase in P. penetrans densities over the whole soil profile was noticed after two crop cycles of host plants.
Use of clean soil: The propagation material is kept either in containers of sterilized growing medium or in soil that has been tested and found free from various nematodes (e.g. EPPO 2022).
Soil fumigation: dependent on legislation. Preplant soil fumigation does not eradicate nematodes but dramatically reduces nematode numbers. The nematodes return to their original population density (or greater) within 2 or 3 years after planting, but the absence of nematode pressure during the initial years of establishment is critical for trees to develop strong, healthy root systems (Abawi & Mai, 2014). With the progressive phase-out of chemical nematicides such as Aldicarb, Carbofuran, and 1,3-Dichloropropene, the effectiveness and sustainability of current plant-parasitic nematode management strategies remain limited (Barbosa et al., 2022).
Healthy plants: To prevent the introduction of nematode problems, new orchards should be established with trees obtained from reputable nurseries that treat their soils for nematodes (Abawi & Mai, 2014).
7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
Yes
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification:
CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
Recommended for listing as an RNQP, based on data.
8 - Tolerance level:
Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
Yes (new regulation proposal)
Proposed Tolerance levels:
Zero tolerance, based on inspection and testing
9 - Risk management measures:
Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
Yes
Proposed Risk management measure:
Non-Certified material (‘Conformitas Agraria Communitatis (CAC)’):
• Mother plants have been produced in a pest free place/site of production
AND
• Plants have been produced in soil/growing medium considered free from P. penetrans (e.g. tested soil, use of sterilized growing media or soil-free).
• Mother plants have been produced in a pest free place/site of production
AND
• Plants have been produced in soil/growing medium considered free from P. penetrans (e.g. tested soil, use of sterilized growing media or soil-free).
Justification (if necessary):
The risk of transmission of this nematode is restricted to materials with roots and soil. Generally, material obtained from mother plants (e.g. buds, cuttings...) doesn’t contain roots and soil. The critical point to avoid the spread of this pest is in the nurseries where certified and CAC seedlings are produced for marketing to growers or end users. Considering that detection by inspection is practically impossible when no symptoms are observed, that symptomology is non-specific (both above and below ground) and the complexity to perform laboratory testing, the fruit SEWG considered that PFA should not be proposed as an option. The Fruit SEWG also considered that an option requiring not growing hosts during > 5 years was not realistic considering how polyphagous the pest is.
REFERENCES:
- Aaltjesschema (2019) Website on information and crop rotation for various crops. The website is s product of Wageningen UR, nematology PPO-AGV. Website is accessible until 31 March 2024, only information for perennial plants and fruit crops will still be available. https://www.aaltjesschema.nl/Home.aspx
- Abawi GS & Mai WF (2014) Root lesion nematodes (revised by Halbrendt JM). In Compendium of apple and pear diseases and pests, second edition (eds Sutton TB, Aldwinckle HS, Agnello AM & Walgenbach JF). American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, USA: 113-114.
- Allen MW (1949) Root-lesion nematodes: resistant rootstocks most promising method of control. California Agriculture, January: 13-14.
- Anonymous (1999) Lesion nematodes. University of Illinois Extension. RPD, 1103. May 1999.
- Bélair G, Coulombe J, Dauphinais N (2018) Management of Pratylenchus penetrans and Verticilllium symptoms in strawberry. Phytoprotection, 98(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.7202/1046783ar
- Castillo P, Vovlas (2007) Biology and ecology of Pratylenchus. In “Pratylechus (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae): diagnosis, biology, pathogenicity and management”. Nematology Monographs & Perspective 6, 305-324.
- De Los Santos B, Talavera M, Media JJ, Molina JM (2022) Plagas y enfermedades en frutos rojos. In “Cultivo, postcosecha, procesado y comercio de berris”. SPE3 s.l., Valencia (España).
- EPPO (2022) PM 4/17 (3) Certification scheme for olive trees and rootstocks. EPPO Bulletin 52:590–60. DOI: 10.1111/epp.1288
- Evenhuis A, Korthals G & Molendijk L (2004) Tagetes patula as an effective catch crop for long-term control of Pratylenchus penetrans. Nematology 6(6), 877-881. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568541044038632
- Jackson-Ziems TA (2016) Root-Lesion Nematodes. Papers in Plant Pathology 523. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/plantpathpapers/523
- Lehman PS (1994) Dissemination of phytoparasitic nematodes. Nematology Circular, No 28. Fla. Dept. Agric.& Consumer Services. Division of Plant Industry.
- López-Aranda JM (2008) El cultivo de la fresa en Huelva. In “La fresa de Huelva”. Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Agricultura y Pesca. Servicio de Publicaciones y Divulgación.
- MAPA (2019) Guía de Gestión Integrada de Plagas: fresa y fresón. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/agricultura/temas/sanidad-vegetal/productos-fitosanitarios/guias-gestion-plagas/horticolas/default.aspx
- McKinley RT, Talboys PW (1979) Effects of Pratylenchus penetrans on development of strawberry wilt caused by Verticillium dahliae. Ann. Appl. Biol., 92: 347-357.
- Moens M & Perry RN (2009) Migratory plant endoparasitic nematodes: a group rich in contrasts and divergence. Annual Review of Phytopathology 47, 313–32.
- Montes F, Paéz JI, Guillén V, Miguel J (2006) Nematodos lesionadores de fresa: Pratylenchus penetrans. In “Fichas de Diagnóstico en Laboratorio de Organismos Nocivos de los Vegetales”. https://www.mapa.gob.es/app/observatorio-de-tecnologias-probadas/diagnostico/ficha.asp?fichaid=356
- Pudasaini MP, Viaene N & Moens M (2006) Effect of marigold (Tagetes patula) on population dynamics of Pratylenchus penetrans in a field. Nematology 8, 477-84.
- Quing Y (2008). Species of Pratylenchus (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae) in Canada: description, distribution, and identification. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 30 (3): 477-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060660809507545
- Sandoval-Ruiz R, Gómez-Alpízar L, Humphreys-Pereira DA, Flores-Chaves L (2023) Molecular identification of root-lesion nematodes, Pratylenchus spp. in agricultural crops from Costa Rica. Agronomía Mesoamericana 34 (1): 49445. doi:10.15517/am.v34i1.49445
- Schmitt DP, Sipes BS (2000) Plant-parasitic nematodes and their management. In “Plant Nutrient Management in Hawaii’s Soils, Approaches for Tropical and Subtropical Agriculture”. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
- Talavera M, Miranda L, Gómez-Mora JA, Vela MD, Verdejo-Lucas S. (2019). Nematode management in the strawberry fields of southern Spain. Agronomy 9, 252: doi:10.3390/agronomy9050252
- Talavera MF (2021) Enfermedades causadas por nematodos en los frutos rojos de Huelva: etiología y control. Phytoma 331, 24-27.
- Taning LM, Lippens L, Formesyn E, Wesemael W (2023) Impact of cover crops on population density of the root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus penetrans. Preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3338686/v1
