Regulated Non-Quarantine Projects

Two EU funded projects for the benefit of the whole EPPO region

Legend
Justification for qualification based on EPPO PM 4 Standards
Justification for disqualification
Additional or non-conclusive information
Standard text



NAME OF THE ORGANISM: Phytophthora x cambivora {Phytophthora cambivora} (PHYTCM)


GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE PEST

Name as submitted in the project specification (if different):
 
Phytophthora cambivora

Pest category:
 
Chromista


1- Identity of the pest/Level of taxonomic listing:

Is the organism clearly a single taxonomic entity and can it be adequately distinguished from other entities of the same rank?
 
Yes

Is the pest defined at the species level or lower?:
 
Yes

Can listing of the pest at a taxonomic level higher than species be supported by scientific reasons or can species be identified within the taxonomic rank which are the (main) pests of concern?
 
  • Not relevant: Fruits (including hops) sector
If necessary, please list the species:
 
-

Is it justified that the pest is listed at a taxonomic rank below species level?
 
Not relevant

Conclusion:
 
  • Candidate: Fruits (including hops) sector
Justification (if necessary):
 
-

2 – Status in the EU:
 
Is this pest already a quarantine pest for the whole EU?
 
No

Presence in the EU:
 
Yes

List of countries (EPPO Global Database):
 
-

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification (if necessary):
 
Data of the presence of this pest on the EU territory is available in CABI datasheet (https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.40956). P. cambivora is widely distributed on all continents. The pest is reported to be present in Austria (2009), Belgium (2009), Bulgaria (2018), Croatia (2013), Czech Republic (2008), Denmark (1971), France (1922), Germany (1996), Greece (2013), Hungary (2017), Ireland (2005), Italy (2013), Netherlands (2009), Poland (2002), Portugal (2013), Romania (2017), Slovakia (2005), Spain (2013), Sweden (2017).

HOST PLANT N°1: Pistacia vera (PIAVE) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
This plant species has no EPPO PM4 Standards, and the pest is not mentioned in other PM4 standards

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

 
Justification:
 
Pistacia vera has been identified as a host of Phytophthora cambivora [only?] in artificial inoculations tests (Kouyeas, 1973 in CABI).
The main pathway of P. x cambivora is the transport of contaminated substrates by human activities: tillage practices and vehicle movement along the rural road network have been associated with disease spread (Vannini et al. 2005; Martins et al. 2007). Cryptic dissemination of Phytophthora inoculum with soil or soil-like substrates plays a major role in epidemiology of the associated diseases (Jung et al., 2009).
Phytophthora cambivora can live as a saprophyte in the soil, feeding on salts and dead organic material, often in competition with other microorganisms. In Europe, P. cambivora is widespread in the soil. Infection is favored by moist and moderate climates. P. cambivora survives in the soil in the form of mycelium, sporangia, zoospores and oospores. It is frequently found in soils with impeded drainage, due to a high water table or to a particular soil texture. Soils may drain poorly because they are compact (fine-textured silty or sandy) or clayey (Day, 1938; Erwin & Ribeiro, 1996, cited from CABI, 2021).
Water is a pathway: Disease outbreaks are associated with local climatic parameters such as precipitation, temperature, pH (Vettraino et al. 2005) and landscape heterogeneity, which facilitates inoculum movement along creeks and natural drainage channels (Vannini et al. 2010).
Plants for planting are a pathway (Jung & Blaschke 2004; Jung et al. 2009): Phytophthora inoculum may be transported from nurseries in latently infected host tissues and substrates (soil, potting mix), even associated with non-host plants. Because of the wide host range and longevity of inoculum sources in the environment, planting material (transplants) are generally not considered to be the main pathway for introduction under outdoor field conditions. The Fruit SEWG noted that the occurrence of temperatures during a period below 0°C may not be a limiting factor as is the case for P. cinnamomi (C. cambivora seems better adapted to cooler conditions, see summarysheet for P. cinnamomi on C. sativa). However, although it has a high persistence capacity in soil, where it can live saprophytically, it seemed that in central Italy it has difficulties to survive in soil for most of the year, which the authors attribute to its inability to produce oospores in the population analysed (sexual spores are formed after the union of mycelium of types A1 and A2; in that area only type A2 is present) (only some oospores may be formed as result of selfing stimulated by ubiquitous soil fungi). Furthermore, chlamydospores are not known to be formed by this species. The above considerations suggest that P. cambivora has the ability to spread from infected roots and establish new infections for only a limited period of the year, when climatic conditions are favourable to the formation, release and survival of zoospores (CABI, 2021; Vettraino et al., 2001), making plants for planting a significant pathway in such particular situations.
True seeds are not known to carry P. cambivora (CABI, 2021).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
No

Justification:
 
In Europe, pistachio production is relatively small compared to other areas in the world like Iran and USA, and also compared to other nuts (pistachio 1% of total nut production - walnut, hazelnut etc. - mostly produced in Greece and Italy) (Avanzatoa et al., 2009).
In the major production areas outside Europe other Phytophthora spp. were linked to diseases in pistachio e.g. in southern Iran Phytophthora citrophthora assumed to be the predominant species in most pistachio growing regions, P. drechsleri appears to be also of great concern in Kerman province. Other Phytophthora species like P. cryptogea and P. nicotianae were also occasionally isolated from pistachio (Banihashemi, 1995). In 2001 two other Phytophthora spp. were identified causing gummosis in Kerman province in Iran: Phytophthora pistaciae and P. melonis. Also in California pistachio is subject to diseases caused by Phytophthora spp. (UC IPM, 2019), pistachio tree decline was linked to Phytophthora niederhauserii, P. mediterranea and Phytophthora Taxon Walnut, causing crown an root rot (Trouillas et al., 2022).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Not candidate

Justification:
 
The Fruit SEWG considered that data of economic impact for P. cambivora on Pistacia vera was lacking.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
 
Conclusion:
 

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Disqualified: data of economic impact lacking on this host plant.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
Yes

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 
Delisting

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
Yes

Proposed Risk management measure:
 
Delisting


REFERENCES:
  • Avanzatoa D, Vaccaro A & Bevilacqua D (2009) A Short Review of Nut Industry in EU. Acta Horticulturae 825, 41-48.
  • Banihashemi Z (1995). Identification of Phytophthora species associated with pistachio gummosis in southern Iran. Acta Horticulturae 419, 349-352. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1995.419.58
  • Breisch H & Hennion B (2004). Chestnut rootstock: towards more resistance. Infos-Ctifl 198, 35-38.
  • Buisman CJ (1927) Root rots caused by Phycomycetes. Review of Applied Mycology 6, 380–381.
  • CABI (2021) Phytophthora cambivora (root rot of forest trees) (last updated 4/Jan/2023; accessed at 27/Mar/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.40956
  • Cristinzio G & Grassi G (1993). Assessing resistance to ink disease (caused by Phytophthora cambivora and Phytophthora cinnamomi) in chestnut cultivars. Monti e Boschi 44(1), 54-58.
  • Day WR (1938). Root-rot of Sweet Chestnut and Beech caused by species of Phytophthora: I. Cause and symptoms of disease: its relation to soil conditions. Forestry. 101-116.
  • Erwin DC & Ribeiro OK (1996). Phytophthora Diseases Worldwide. St Paul, Minnesota, USA: American Phytopathological Society Press.
  • Hwang SC & Ko WH (1978) Biology of chlamydospores, sporangia, and zoospores of Phytophthora cinnamomi in soil. Phytopathology 68, 726-731.
  • Jung T & Blaschke M (2004) Phytophthora root and collar rot of alders in Bavaria: distribution, modes of spread and possible management strategies. Plant Pathology 53, 97–208.
  • Jung T, Vannini A, Brasier CM (2009) Progress in Understanding Phytophthora Diseases of Trees in Europe 2004–2007. In Proceedings of the Fourth Meeting of the International Union of Forest Research Organization (IUFRO) Working Party S07.02.09: Phytophthoras in Forests and Natural Ecosystems (Ed Goheen EM & Frankel SJ). General Technical Report PSW-GTR-221, Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. Pacific Southwest Research Station, pp. 3–24
  • Jung T, Jung MH, Scanu B, Seress D, Kovács GM, Maia C, Pérez-Sierra A, Chang TT, Chandelier A, Heungens K, van Poucke K, Abad-Campos P, Léon M, Cacciola SO & Bakonyi J (2017). Six new Phytophthora species from ITS Clade 7a including two sexually functional heterothallic hybrid species detected in natural ecosystems in Taiwan. Persoonia 38, 100–135.
  • Kouyeas H (1973). Pathogenicity of Phytophthora species to pistachio tree. Annales de l'Institut Phytopathologique Benaki, 10(4):333-341 (Cited from CABI).
  • Linderman RG, Davis EA (2006) Survival of Phytophthora ramorum compared to other species of Phytophthora in potting media components, compost, and soil. Hort Technology 16, 502–507.
  • Martins L, Castro J, Macedo W, Marques C & Abreu C (2007) Assessment of the spread of chestnut ink disease using remote sensing and geostatistical methods. European Journal of Plant Pathology 119, 159–164.
  • Mullett M, Van Poucke K., Haegeman A., Focquet F, Cauldron NC, Knaus BJ, Jung MH, Kageyama K, Hieno A, Masuja H, Uematsu S, Webber JF, Brasier CM, Bakonyi J, Heungens K, Grünwald HJ & Jung T (2023) Phylogeography and population structure of the global, wide host-range hybrid pathogen Phytophthora × cambivora. IMA Fungus 14(4), 18 pp. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43008-023-00109-6.
  • Mirabolfathy M, Cooke DEL, Duncan JM, Williams NA, Ershad D & Alizadeh A (2001). Phytophthora pistaciae sp. nov. and P. melonis: the principal causes of pistachio gummosis in Iran. Mycological Research 105(10), 1166-1175.
  • Pereira JG, Valdiviesso T, Abreu CP de & Sousa AJT de (1995) Chestnut ink disease. Appraisal of the sensitivity of chestnut clones to ink disease. Phytoma 477, 50-52.
  • Petri L (1917) Ricerche sulla morfologia e biologia della Blepharospora cambivora, parassita del castagno. Atti Reale Accad Dei Lincei Rend Delle Classi Di Sci Fisiche Mat Nat 5, 297-299.
  • Robin C, Morel O, Vettraino AM, Perlerou C, Diamandis S, Vannini A (2006) Genetic variation in susceptibility to Phytophthora cambivora in European chestnut (Castanea sativa). Forest Ecology and Management 226, 199-207.
  • Trouillas FP, Nouri MT & Bourret TB (2022). Identification and characterization of Phytophthora species associated with crown and root rot of pistachio trees in California. Plant Disease 106(1), 197-206.
  • UC IPM (2019) Phytophthora root and crown rot. In Pistachio Pest management guidelines. University of California publication 3461, 60. https://ipm.ucanr.edu/legacy_assets/pdf/pmg/pmgpistachio.pdf
  • Vannini A & Vettraino AM (2001) Ink disease in chestnuts: impact on the European chestnut. Forest Snow Landscape Research 76(3), 345–350.
  • Vannini A, Vettraino AM, Fabi A, Montaghi A, Valentini R & Belli C (2005) Monitoring Ink disease of chestnut with the airborne multispectral system A.S.P.I.S. Acta Horticulturae 693, 529–533.
  • Vettraino AM, Natili G, Anselmi N & Vannini A (2001) Recovery and pathogenicity of Phytophthora species associated with a resurgence of ink disease in Castanea sativa in Italy. Plant Pathology 50, 90-96.
  • Vettraino AM, Morel O, Perlerou C, Robin C, Diamandis S & Vannini A (2005) Occurrence and distribution of Phytophthora species in European chestnut stands, and their association with Ink Disease and crown decline. European Journal of Plant Pathology 111, 169-180.
  • Vannini A, Natili G, Anselmi N, Montaghi A & Vettraino AM (2010) Distribution and gradient analysis of Ink disease in chestnut forests. Forest Pathology 40, 73–86