Regulated Non-Quarantine Projects

Two EU funded projects for the benefit of the whole EPPO region

Legend
Justification for qualification based on EPPO PM 4 Standards
Justification for disqualification
Additional or non-conclusive information
Standard text



NAME OF THE ORGANISM: Meloidogyne javanica (MELGJA)


GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE PEST

Name as submitted in the project specification (if different):
 

Pest category:
 
Nematoda


1- Identity of the pest/Level of taxonomic listing:

Is the organism clearly a single taxonomic entity and can it be adequately distinguished from other entities of the same rank?
 
Yes

Is the pest defined at the species level or lower?:
 
Yes

Can listing of the pest at a taxonomic level higher than species be supported by scientific reasons or can species be identified within the taxonomic rank which are the (main) pests of concern?
 
  • Not relevant: Fruits (including hops) sector
If necessary, please list the species:
 
-

Is it justified that the pest is listed at a taxonomic rank below species level?
 
Not relevant

Conclusion:
 
  • Candidate: Fruits (including hops) sector
Justification (if necessary):
 
The integration of molecular and isozyme electrophoretic pattern techniques with classical morphological approaches help to provide tools for differentiating Meloidogyne species and significantly improve and facilitate the routine identification of these nematodes (Archidona-Yuste et al., 2018). Some references for identification via morphological characteristics, isozyme electrophoresis and molecular methods are available in EPPO Standard PM 7/103 Diagnostic protocol for Meloidogyne enterolobii.

2 – Status in the EU:
 
Is this pest already a quarantine pest for the whole EU?
 
No

Presence in the EU:
 
Yes

List of countries (EPPO Global Database):
 
-

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification (if necessary):
 
This species is considered to be present worldwide. In the EPPO region, M. javanica is reported in olive in e.g. Greece, Italy, Jordan, Portugal, Spain (Castillo et al., 2010), Israel (Ali et al., 2014) and Morocco (Aït Hamza et al., 2017).

HOST PLANT N°1: Olea europaea (OLVEU) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Qualified

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
EPPO Standard PM 4/17 Certification scheme for olive trees and rootstock recommends using sterilized growing medium or soil tested and found free from Meloidogyne javanica. Full assessment of the RNQP status of M. javanica, together with M. incognita, was performed in 2021/2022 in the context of the revision of EPPO Standard PM 4/17. The RNQP status was considered justified by olive certification experts.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

 
Justification:
 
The root knot nematode M. japonica is known to infect olive trees. Plant parasitic nematodes move only short distances and, thus their dissemination can occur via water, wind and human activities such as the introduction of infected planting material or diffusion of infested soil with nursery practices.
Hamza et al. (2017) and Nico et al. (2002) suggested that the use of infected rooted plantlets was one of the likely major sources of root-knot nematode inoculum in the field. In Spain, a study in olive nurseries reported a high-percentage of root-knot nematodes in infected plantlets [Meloidogyne incognita (14.7%), M. javanica (11.2%), and M. arenaria (2.7%)] (Nico et al., 2002).
These nematodes occur in sporadic distributions in established orchards. Notably, three major parameters drive the distribution of Meloidogyne spp. in cultivated olives: cover vegetation on alley, irrigation and soil texture; but different species respond differently to them. In particular the presence of M. incognita is highly correlated with sandy loamy soils, the presence of M. javanica with irrigated soils and cover vegetation, while the presence of M. arenaria is correlated with the absence of cover vegetation on alley and absence of irrigation. These parameters likely influence the selection of each particular Meloidogyne species from a major dispersal source, such as the rooted plantlets used to establish the orchards (Archidona-Yuste et al., 2018).
Different management measures allow to reduce the importance of other pathways than plants for planting such as the use of new pest-free production sites to establish the planting material, management via soil disinfestation with fumigants prior to planting, soil solarization, use of special amendments (biofumigation), establishment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant root systems (to protect plants against soilborne diseases through improvement of phosphorus (P) absorption), direct competition etc., the use of good practices to avoid moving soils between different production sites etc. (Castillo et al., 2010). Taking all these measures into consideration, plants for planting is considered to be a major pathway compared to others.

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
The root knot nematodes M. arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica are known to damage cultivated olive trees, especially in nurseries where optimum irrigation conditions favour root proliferation and increased nematode population, and which have been shown to be more susceptible than older plants (Castillo et al., 2010; Ali et al., 2014). Pathogenicity assays under controlled environmental conditions demonstrated the potential of M. arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica to damage olive rootstocks as well as self-rooted olive cultivars (Castillo et al., 2010). Meloidogyne sp. cause heavy root galling on olive trees, distorted feeder roots as well as plant growth retardation. At low infection levels, no disease symptoms are observed on the stems or leaves of nematode-infected planting stocks as compared with non-infected ones (Nico et al., 2002). On specific cultivars, e.g. Picual (one of the olive cultivars most extensively grown in the Mediterranean Basin), these nematodes can show a distinct yellowing affecting the uppermost leaves followed by partial defoliation (Castillo et al., 2010; Ali et al., 2014). Controlled experiments showed that root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne (e.g., M. arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica) may be responsible for 5 to 10% crop losses, while the damage is often difficult to assign to plant parasitic nematodes (Ali et al., 2014). Studies on the pathogenicity of Meloidogyne spp. to olives suggest that main stem diameter is a highly sensitive parameter for assessing damage caused by M. arenaria and M. javanica (Castillo et al., 2010).
In Argentina, the etiology of a generalized olive drying syndrome (designated “seca”) was attributed to a disease complex involving M. javanica and several species of the soilborne fungus Fusarium, although a causal relationship has not been established (Castillo et al., 2010).
Indirect root damages are also reported to be related to nematode infection, whose penetration opens pathways to other soilborne pathogens (bacteria, fungi). The best example is the association of plant pathogenic nematodes such as M. incognita with the fungal pathogen Verticillium dahliae (Verticillium wilt). The presence of nematodes enhances the symptoms induced by the fungus (Ali et al., 2014).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Medium in nurseries (but appears to be lower in orchards)

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
No

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Damage to established olive orchards by nematode parasitism may not be clearly perceived because olive is an extremely vigorous plant able to thrive in relatively dry areas, which may obscure expression of symptoms from nematode attacks. However, modern olive production is based largely on the establishment of new high-input orchards intended to increase yields while reducing the time for investment recovery. This model, broadly adopted in new olive-producing areas of the Southern Hemisphere and the Mediterranean Basin, creates an environment conducive to diseases caused by or involving nematodes (Ali et al., 2014). The economic importance of these nematodes in olive cultivation has also increased in recent years because most chemical agents for the control of plant-parasitic nematodes have been banned due to environmental and health concerns (Castillo et al., 2010).

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
The appropriate application of exclusion principles should lead to nematode-free nursery stock. Disinfestation of soil by any means cannot achieve total nematode control. The use of potting mixtures that are not fully disinfested reduces nematological risk, but could mask the presence of pathogen nematodes in seemingly healthy stock (Castillo et al., 2010).

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Recommended for listing as an RNQP, based on EPPO PM4 Standard and data.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
No

Proposed Risk management measure:
 

Justification (if necessary):
 
The Fruit SEWG discussed how visual examination should be performed in a nursery: although random inspection of the roots of asymptomatic plants for this nematode is better (i.e. uprooting some asymptomatic plants), some countries considered that it would have an unacceptable economic impact and recommended that root examination is only performed following suspicions.

REFERENCES:
  • Aït Hamza M, Ali N, Tavoillot J, Fossati-Gaschignard O, Boubaker H, El Mousadik A & Mateille T (2017) Diversity of root-knot nematodes in Moroccan olive nurseries and orchards: does Meloidogyne javanica disperse according to invasion processes? BMC Ecology 17, 1-13. Available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-017-0153-9
  • Ali N, Chapuis E, Tavoillot J & Mateille T (2014) Plant-parasitic nematodes associated with olive tree (Olea europaea L.) with a focus on the Mediterranean Basin: a review. Comptes Rendus Biologies 337, 423–442. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2014.05.006
  • Archidona-Yuste A, Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C, LieÂbanas G, Rapoport HF, Castillo P & Palomares-Rius JE (2018) Diversity of root-knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne, 1892 (Nematoda: Meloidogynidae) associated with olive plants and environmental cues regarding their distribution in southern Spain. PLoS ONE 13, e0198236. Available at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
  • Castillo P, Nico AI, Navas-Cortés JA, Landa BB, Jimenez-Diaz RM & Vovlas N (2010) Plant-parasitic nematodes attacking olive trees and their management. Plant Disease 94, 148–162.
  • Nico A, Rapoport HF, Jiménez-Diaz RM & Castillo P (2002) Incidence and population density of plant-parasitic
  • nematodes associated with olive planting stocks at nurseries in southern Spain. Plant Disease 86, 1075–1079.