Regulated Non-Quarantine Projects

Two EU funded projects for the benefit of the whole EPPO region

Legend
Justification for qualification based on EPPO PM 4 Standards
Justification for disqualification
Additional or non-conclusive information
Standard text



NAME OF THE ORGANISM: Meloidogyne arenaria (MELGAR)


GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE PEST

Name as submitted in the project specification (if different):
 

Pest category:
 
Nematoda


1- Identity of the pest/Level of taxonomic listing:

Is the organism clearly a single taxonomic entity and can it be adequately distinguished from other entities of the same rank?
 
Yes

Is the pest defined at the species level or lower?:
 
Yes

Can listing of the pest at a taxonomic level higher than species be supported by scientific reasons or can species be identified within the taxonomic rank which are the (main) pests of concern?
 
  • Not relevant: Fruits (including hops) sector
If necessary, please list the species:
 
-

Is it justified that the pest is listed at a taxonomic rank below species level?
 
Not relevant

Conclusion:
 
  • Candidate: Fruits (including hops) sector
Justification (if necessary):
 
-

2 – Status in the EU:
 
Is this pest already a quarantine pest for the whole EU?
 
No

Presence in the EU:
 
Yes

List of countries (EPPO Global Database):
 
-

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification (if necessary):
 
The pest is reported from Bulgaria (Samaliev et al., 2018), Croatia (Biondić et al., 2023), France (Voisin et al., 1999; Djian-Caporalino, 2012), Greece (Tzortzakakis et al., 2011), Italy (Vovlas et al., 2008), Netherlands (Docters van Leeuwen, 2009), Poland (Nowaczyk et al., 2008), Romenia (Boroş et al., 2018), Slovenia (Biondić et al., 2023), Spain (López-Pérez et al., 2011).

HOST PLANT N°1: Prunus salicina (PRNSC) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.


Origin of the listing:
 
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072

Plants for planting:
 
Plants intended for planting


3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
 
No
 
Conclusion:
 
Evaluation continues

 
Justification (if necessary):
 
Remark: the assessment performed covers the given host species as well as interspecific hybrids with other Prunus species.

4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

 
Justification:
 
Main transmission mode (in addition to plants for planting) is soil (EPPO, 2022; PM4/017)
In Europe, root-knot nematodes are increasingly important. Out of more than 90 Meloidogyne species currently described, 23 have been found on the continent. Meloidogyne arenaria, M. javanica and M. incognita are the most common species in warmer conditions of southern Europe, but also in glasshouses in northern Europe (Wesemael et al., 2011). Meloidogyne arenaria is considered to be the most frequent species in Spain after M. incognita (López-Pérez et al., 2011).
The host range of M. arenaria is extremely large and includes members from many plant families including monocotyledons, dicotyledons, and herbaceous and woody plants. This root-knot species parasitizes most of the major food crops (vegetables, fruit trees, brambles and vines) and ornamental plants grown in tropical, subtropical and temperate climates (cited from CABI, 2021).
Eggs and juveniles can be transported with soil, so anything which has soil attached is a potential pathway including agricultural equipment and containers, tools, vehicle tires, and workers clothing or boots (CABI, 2021). The nematodes can also be transported by water; down the river flooded fields can become infected (Clavero-Camacho et al., 2024).
Meloidogyne spp. are not transmitted with seeds (in Wesemael et al., 2011).

5 - Economic impact:

Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
 
Yes

Justification:
 
M. arenaria is an economically important plant pathogen that parasitizes thousands of plant species worldwide. The peanut root-knot nematode is a pest of major food crops and significantly reduces the quantity and quality of food and fiber production. The average loss caused by root-knot nematodes is thought to be around 5%; however, in some fields the loss can be complete. In some areas of the world, root-knot nematodes are so common that galls on roots are considered normal. Often the damage caused by these nematodes is overlooked or the blame is placed on other agronomic problems. Stunted, unthrifty growth by infected plants is often attributed to vague agricultural ailments such as tired, poor, worn-out and exhausted land (Sasser and Carter, 1984) (cited from CABI). Although Meloidogyne is considered worldwide as the most important genus of plant-parasitic nematodes, information in the scientific literature on the economic impact of root-knot nematodes in Europe is scarce (Wesemael et al., 2011).
The four major Meloidogyne species, M. incognita, M. javanica, M. arenaria, and M. hapla can cause economic damage to stone fruits (Marull et al., 1992) and yield losses (McKenry, 2004) in different parts of the world. Root-knot nematodes cause a 15% loss in vigour and yield of Prunus crops (nurseries and orchards) on a worldwide basis. The economic importance of Meloidogyne spp. to stone fruits was shown with the use of nematicides and rootstocks with nematode resistance. Sharpe et al. (1993) showed that pre-plant fumigation with methyl bromide to control Meloidogyne spp. in peaches increased the cumulative yield over 3 seasons by 2535Kg per hectare. Nematicides have been used to increase yield on many different crops.
In Mediterranean and warm temperate climates, the perennial crops most affected by root-knot nematode species include Prunus spp. and, to a lesser extent fig (Ficus carica) (Saucet et al., 2016).

What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
 
Medium

Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
 
No

Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
 

Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
For most Prunus spp., root-stocks resistant against root knot nematodes are available (Saucet et al., 2016); however, the Fruit SEWG considered that these rootstocks are only rarely used. The economic impact is rated as Medium in absence of resistant rootstocks.

6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 
Rootstocks with a wide resistance spectrum for Meloidogyne spp. have been developed using the Myrobalan plum, P. cerasifera, as a parental (Saucet et al., 2016).
Use of clean soil: The propagation material is kept either in containers of sterilized growing medium or in soil that has been tested and found free from Xiphinema diversicaudatum (see EPPO Standard PM4/35), Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita, M. javanica, Pratylenchus vulnus and Verticillium dahlia (EPPO 2022)
Woody crops are generally grown in long-term specialized production systems that remain in place for decades. It is not possible, therefore, to control polyphagous root-knot nematode species by crop rotation (Saucet et al., 2016).

7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
 
Yes
 
Conclusion:
 
Candidate

Justification:
 

CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
 
Recommended for listing as an RNQP based on data.


8 - Tolerance level:

Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
 
No

Proposed Tolerance levels:
 

9 - Risk management measures:

Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
 
No

Proposed Risk management measure:
 

Justification (if necessary):
 
The Fruit SEWG discussed how visual examination should be performed in a nursery: although random inspection of the roots of asymptomatic plants for this nematode is better (i.e. uprooting some asymptomatic plants), some experts considered that it would have an unacceptable economic burden and recommended that root examination is only performed in case of suspicions.

REFERENCES:
  • Biondić R, Puškarić T, Gerič Stare B & Brmež M (2023). The status of root-knot nematodes of the Meloidogyne genus in Croatia, with a special reference to the quarantine species. Poljoprivreda 29(1), 27-34.
  • Boroş L, Fanelli E, Şesan TE, Dobrin I & Luca FD (2018). Detection and characterization of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) associated with three host plants in Romania. Romanian Biotechnological Letters 23(6), 14097-14106.
  • CABI (2021). Meloidogyne arenaria (peanut root-knot nematode), (accessed 13/Mar/2024). https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/cabicompendium.33233
  • Clavero-Camacho I, Archidona-Yuste A, Cantalapiedra-Navarrete C, Castillo P & Palomares-Rius JE (2024) Prevalence and ecological factors affecting the distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in Prunus groves in Spain Journal of Integrative Agriculture 23(2), 566–589.
  • Djian-Caporalino C (2012). Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.), a growing problem in French vegetable crops. EPPO Bulletin 42(1), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2012.02530.xCitations: 25
  • Docters van Leeuwen WM (2009). Gallenboek, vierde druk (bewerking H. Roskam). KNNV Uitgeverij.
  • EPPO (2022) PM 4/17 (3) Certification scheme for olive trees and rootstocks. EPPO Bulletin 52, 590–60. DOI: 10.1111/epp.1288
  • López-Pérez JA, Escuer M, Díez-Rojo MA, Robertson L, Piedra Buena A, López-Cepero J & Bello A (2011). Host range of Meloidogyne arenaria (Neal, 1889) Chitwood, 1949 (Nematoda: Meloidogynidae) in Spain. Nematropica 41:130-140.Nowaczyk K, Dobosz R, Budziszewska M, Kornobis S & Obrępalska-Stęplowska A (2008). Morphometric and genetic characteristic of Polish populations of Meloidogyne hapla and Meloidogyne arenaria. Progress in Plant Protection 48(1), 126-130.
  • Marull J, Pinochet J, Felipe A & Cenis JL (1994) Resistance verification in Prunus selections to a mixture of thirteen Meloidogyne isolates and resistance mechanisms of a peach-almond hybrid to M. javanica. Fundamental and Applied Nematology 17(1), pp.85-92.
  • McKenry MV (2004) Three nematode genera and the damage they cause for plum producers. Journal of Nematology 36(3), p.333.
  • Samaliev HY, Salkova DS, Baycheva OTs, Zinovieva SV & Udalova ZhV (2018) Investigations of the root-knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne (Goeldi, 1887) on the territories of Bulgaria and Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Parasitology 12(4), 94–98. DOI: 10.31016/1998-8435-2018-12-4-94-9
  • Saucet SB, Van Ghelder C, Abad P, Duval H & Esmenjaud D9 (2016) Resistance to root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp. in woody plants. New Phytologist (2016) 211: 41–56. doi: 10.1111/nph.13933
  • Sharpe RR, Pusey PL, Nyczepir AP & Florkowski WJ (1993) Yield and economics of intervention with peach tree short life disease. Journal of production agriculture 6(2), pp.241-244.
  • Simeone AM & Di Vito M (1990) Reactions to nematodes of selections of peach rootstocks. Peach, XXIII IHC 315, pp.197-202.
  • Tzortzakakis AE, Conceicao ILPM da, Santos MCV dos & Abrantes IM de O (2011) Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Greece. Hellenic Plant Protection Journal 4: 25-30.
  • Voisin R, Rubio-Cabetas MJ, Minot JC & Esmenjaud D (1999). Penetration, development and emigration of juveniles of the nematode Meloidogyne arenaria in Myrobalan plum (Prunus cerasifera) clones bearing the Ma resistance genes. European journal of plant pathology, 105(1), 103-108.
  • Vovlas N, Troccoli A, Minuto A, Bruzzone C, Sasanelli N & Castillo P. (2008). Pathogenicity and host–parasite relationships of Meloidogyne arenaria in sweet basil. Plant disease 92(9), 1329-1335.
  • Wesemael W, Viaene N & Moens M. (2011). Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Europe. Nematology 13(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1163/138855410X526831