NAME OF THE ORGANISM: Bruchus rufimanus (BRCHRU)
GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE PEST
Name as submitted in the project specification (if different to the preferred name):
1- Identity of the pest/Level of taxonomic listing:
Is the organism clearly a single taxonomic entity and can it be adequately distinguished from other entities of the same rank?
Is the pest defined at the species level or lower?:
Can listing of the pest at a taxonomic level higher than species be supported by scientific reasons or can species be identified within the taxonomic rank which are the (main) pests of concern?
- Not relevant: Vegetable seed sector
Is it justified that the pest is listed at a taxonomic rank below species level?
- Candidate: Vegetable seed sector
2 – Status in the EU:
Is this pest already a quarantine pest for the whole EU?
Presence in the EU:
Justification (if necessary):
The pest is present in all EU Member States (Fauna Europaea, 2017; Seidenglanz & Huňady, 2016).
HOST PLANT N°1: Phaseolus coccineus (PHSCO) for the Vegetable seed sector.
Origin of the listing:
1 - Vegetable seed sector: Council Directive 2002/55/EC
Plants for planting:
3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
No references to evidence of infestation of seeds of Phaseolus coccineus by Bruchus rufimanus could be found.
CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
Disqualified: no references to evidence of infestation of seeds of Phaseolus coccineus, Phaseolus vulgaris or Pisum sativum by Bruchus rufimanus could be found.
8 - Tolerance level:
Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
Proposed Tolerance levels:
9 - Risk management measures:
Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
Proposed Risk management measure:
- Seidenglanz M & Huňady I (2016) Effects of faba bean (Vicia faba) varieties on the development of Bruchus rufimanus. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 52, 22–29;