| Legend |
|---|
| Justification for qualification based on EPPO PM 4 Standards |
| Justification for disqualification |
| Additional or non-conclusive information |
| Standard text |
NAME OF THE ORGANISM: Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis (XANTJU)
GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE PEST
Name as submitted in the project specification (if different):
Pest category:
Bacteria
1- Identity of the pest/Level of taxonomic listing:
Is the organism clearly a single taxonomic entity and can it be adequately distinguished from other entities of the same rank?
Yes
Is the pest defined at the species level or lower?:
Yes
Can listing of the pest at a taxonomic level higher than species be supported by scientific reasons or can species be identified within the taxonomic rank which are the (main) pests of concern?
- Not relevant: Fruits (including hops) sector
If necessary, please list the species:
-
Is it justified that the pest is listed at a taxonomic rank below species level?
Yes
Conclusion:
- Candidate: Fruits (including hops) sector
Justification (if necessary):
-
2 – Status in the EU:
Is this pest already a quarantine pest for the whole EU?
No
Presence in the EU:
Yes
List of countries (EPPO Global Database):
Austria (2001); Bulgaria (2001); Denmark (2001); France (2001); Germany (2001); Greece (2001); Italy (2011); Netherlands (2001); Poland (2015); Portugal (2001); Romania (2001); Slovenia (2001); Spain (2001)
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification (if necessary):
Data of the presence of this pest on the EU territory are available in EPPO Global Database (https://gd.eppo.int/).
HOST PLANT N°1: Juglans regia (IUGRE) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.
Origin of the listing:
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2014/98/EU and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072
Plants for planting:
Plants intended for planting
3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
No
Conclusion:
Evaluation continues
4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
No
Conclusion:
Not candidate
Justification:
Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis has a narrow host range, comprising of various species within the Juglans genus, including Juglans regia (Plantwise Knowledge Bank, 2023).
Infected nursery material of walnut (infections on leaves or trunk) is the main pathway for introduction and spread into newly cultivated areas. X. arboricola pv. juglandis is also disseminated through pollen (Kałużna et al., 2021).
Traditionally, grafted rootstocks are kept for rooting in supervised and controlled nursery fields: there, they may become infected through bacterial dissemination from nearby infected plants or groves via wind-driven rain or pollen. A study conducted in Italy highlighted that micro-propagated plants might be infected as well: indeed, walnut plants raised in screen houses and used to obtain meristematic tissue from buds revealed symptomless infections (Kałużna et al., 2021).
Summary: infected propagation material is the major route into an area without the disease. However, the Fruit SEWG noted that nurseries and walnut production are generally located in areas where walnut is present either in the environment or at least in gardens... and the disease is already occurring worldwide. Once the disease is there, it can disperse with pollen in the wind and chemical control is then the only option. So, the SEWG concluded that clean material will not prevent infection from surrounding areas and considered that plants for planting was not a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal.
Infected nursery material of walnut (infections on leaves or trunk) is the main pathway for introduction and spread into newly cultivated areas. X. arboricola pv. juglandis is also disseminated through pollen (Kałużna et al., 2021).
Traditionally, grafted rootstocks are kept for rooting in supervised and controlled nursery fields: there, they may become infected through bacterial dissemination from nearby infected plants or groves via wind-driven rain or pollen. A study conducted in Italy highlighted that micro-propagated plants might be infected as well: indeed, walnut plants raised in screen houses and used to obtain meristematic tissue from buds revealed symptomless infections (Kałużna et al., 2021).
Summary: infected propagation material is the major route into an area without the disease. However, the Fruit SEWG noted that nurseries and walnut production are generally located in areas where walnut is present either in the environment or at least in gardens... and the disease is already occurring worldwide. Once the disease is there, it can disperse with pollen in the wind and chemical control is then the only option. So, the SEWG concluded that clean material will not prevent infection from surrounding areas and considered that plants for planting was not a significant pathway compared to natural dispersal.
5 - Economic impact:
Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
Yes
Justification:
The disease can cause three types of symptoms: bacterial blight of walnut (BBW), brown apical necrosis (BAN) together with fungal pathogens and X. arboricola pv. juglandis is also related to a more recently reported disease, so-called vertical oozing canker (VOC). The diseases may decrease the effectiveness of nursery production and reduce crop quality and yield due to premature fruit drop, as well as causing shell staining and kernel browning of the nuts still hanging on the tree (Belisario et al., 2002; Bouvet, 2005; Hajri et al., 2010; Lang & Evans, 2010; Lindow et al., 2014, cited from Kałużna et al., 2021). It is expected that, due to global warming and the popularity of walnut nuts, the harmfulness of these complex diseases will increase (Kałużna et al., 2021).
BBW: The disease starts with small water-soaked spots on the leaves, these coalesce, and turn into brown necrotic lesions. On twigs necrotic lesions can develop, the twigs can die. The pollen produced in catkins may also be colonized with X. arboricola pv juglandis, thus serving as an efficient dissemination pathway for the pathogen (Ark, 1944). On the fruits, the disease also starts with small, water-soaked, dark lesions, which rapidly turn necrotic, deepen, and collapse. At high humidity and warm temperatures, droplets of bacterial slime may ooze from the lesions. The affected fruits shrink, and in most cases drop off prematurely. Late infections, during shell hardening, are usually limited to the epicarp of the fruit, with the infected nuts showing a necrotized husk. On twigs and shoots, necrotic cankers may occur (Lang & Evans, 2010; Scortichini, 2010).
Symptoms of BAN manifest themselves as apical necrosis originating at the stigmatic end of the fruit. On fallen fruit, a brown patch appearing exclusively at the blossom end can occur, as well as blackening and rotting of inner tissues. The symptoms observed differ from those of WBB (Belisario et al., 2002; Moragrega & Özaktan, 2010).
The symptoms of VOC develop in woody tissues. Initially, they include longitudinal deformations of the affected trunks, followed by vertical cankers developing on both the trunks and branches, with brown to black exudates, observed mainly in summer. In the final stage, severe distortion and cracking of the affected trunks become evident (Hajri et al., 2010).
BBW: The disease starts with small water-soaked spots on the leaves, these coalesce, and turn into brown necrotic lesions. On twigs necrotic lesions can develop, the twigs can die. The pollen produced in catkins may also be colonized with X. arboricola pv juglandis, thus serving as an efficient dissemination pathway for the pathogen (Ark, 1944). On the fruits, the disease also starts with small, water-soaked, dark lesions, which rapidly turn necrotic, deepen, and collapse. At high humidity and warm temperatures, droplets of bacterial slime may ooze from the lesions. The affected fruits shrink, and in most cases drop off prematurely. Late infections, during shell hardening, are usually limited to the epicarp of the fruit, with the infected nuts showing a necrotized husk. On twigs and shoots, necrotic cankers may occur (Lang & Evans, 2010; Scortichini, 2010).
Symptoms of BAN manifest themselves as apical necrosis originating at the stigmatic end of the fruit. On fallen fruit, a brown patch appearing exclusively at the blossom end can occur, as well as blackening and rotting of inner tissues. The symptoms observed differ from those of WBB (Belisario et al., 2002; Moragrega & Özaktan, 2010).
The symptoms of VOC develop in woody tissues. Initially, they include longitudinal deformations of the affected trunks, followed by vertical cankers developing on both the trunks and branches, with brown to black exudates, observed mainly in summer. In the final stage, severe distortion and cracking of the affected trunks become evident (Hajri et al., 2010).
What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
Major
Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
No
Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
Conclusion:
Justification:
6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
Yes
Conclusion:
Justification:
Chemical control: Once the disease is present in walnut groves, copper compounds are widely used, mostly in association with dithiocarbamates; where allowed, antibiotics (preferably kasugamycin) are sprayed. The emergence of strains highly resistant to copper currently represents the major threat for effective management of the bacterial blight of walnut (Kałużna et al., 2021).
Cultivar choice: Early leafing cultivars are usually more susceptible to walnut blight (Olson et al., 1997). In addition, cultivar susceptibility would seem to play an important role also for fruit apical necrosis, cvs Hartley, Chandler, Serr, Lara and Vina being very sensitive (Moragraga & Özaktan, 2010). Other important predisposing factors increasing the severity of fruit apical necrosis are sandy soils, acidic soils and phosphorous, calcium and magnesium deficiencies (Garcin & Duchesne, 2001).
Cultural practices: This may include removing infected plant material, managing irrigation practices to reduce water on the foliage (Manthos et al., 2024).
Remark: in responses to the questionnaire, DE commented that no feasible and effective measures were available to control the pest on plants for planting at incidence above a certain threshold.
Cultivar choice: Early leafing cultivars are usually more susceptible to walnut blight (Olson et al., 1997). In addition, cultivar susceptibility would seem to play an important role also for fruit apical necrosis, cvs Hartley, Chandler, Serr, Lara and Vina being very sensitive (Moragraga & Özaktan, 2010). Other important predisposing factors increasing the severity of fruit apical necrosis are sandy soils, acidic soils and phosphorous, calcium and magnesium deficiencies (Garcin & Duchesne, 2001).
Cultural practices: This may include removing infected plant material, managing irrigation practices to reduce water on the foliage (Manthos et al., 2024).
Remark: in responses to the questionnaire, DE commented that no feasible and effective measures were available to control the pest on plants for planting at incidence above a certain threshold.
7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
Conclusion:
Justification:
CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
Disqualified: plants for planting is not a significant pathway
8 - Tolerance level:
Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
Yes
Proposed Tolerance levels:
Delisting
9 - Risk management measures:
Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
Yes
Proposed Risk management measure:
Delisting
REFERENCES:
- Ark PA (1944) Further evidence of pollen dissemination of walnut blight. Phytopathology, 34, 329-334.
- Belisario A, Maccaroni M, Corazza L, Balmas V & Valier A (2002) Occurrence and etiology of brown apical necrosis on Persian (English) walnut fruit. Plant Disease 86, 599-60.
- Bouvet G (2005) Walnut blight-apical necrosis: test of agronomic control. Acta Horticulturae 705, 447-449.
- Garcin A & Duchesne D (2001) Walnut blight and apical necrosis. Acta Horticulturae 705, 447-449.
- Hajri A, Meyer D, Delort F, Guillaumes J, Brin C & Manceau C (2010) Identification of a genetic lineage within Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis as the causal agent of vertical oozing canker of Persian (English) walnut in France. Plant Pathology 59, 1014-1022.
- Lang MD & Evans KJ (2010) Epidemiology and status of walnut blight in Australia. Journal of Plant Pathology 92(1, Supplement), S1.49-S1. 51.
- Kałużna M, Fischer-Le Saux M, Pothier JF, Jacques M-A, Obradović A, Tavares F & Stefani E (2021) Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis and pv. corylina: Brothers or distant relatives? Genetic clues, epidemiology, and insights for disease management. Molecular Plant Pathology 2(12), 1481-1499. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.13073
- Lindow S, Olson W & Buchner R (2014) Colonization of dormant walnut buds by Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis is predictive of subsequent disease. Phytopathology 104, 1163-1174.
- Manthos I, Sotiropoulos, T & Vagelas, I (2024) Is the artificial pollination of walnut trees with drones able to minimize the presence of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis? A Review. Applied Sciences 14, 2732. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14072732
- Moragrega C & Özaktan H (2010) Apical necrosis of Persian (English) walnut (Juglans regia): an update. Journal of Plant Pathology 92(1 supplement), S67–S71.
- Olson WH, Buchner RP, Adaskaveg JE & Lindow SE (1997) Walnut blight control in California. Acta Horticulturae 442, 361-365.
- Scortichini M (2010) Epidemiology and predisposing factors of some major bacterial diseases of stone and nut fruit trees species. Journal of Plant Pathology 92(1, Supplement), S1.73-S1.78.
