| Legend |
|---|
| Justification for qualification based on EPPO PM 4 Standards |
| Justification for disqualification |
| Additional or non-conclusive information |
| Standard text |
NAME OF THE ORGANISM: Dematophora necatrix {Rosellinia necatrix} (ROSLNE)
GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE PEST
Name as submitted in the project specification (if different):
Pest category:
Fungi
1- Identity of the pest/Level of taxonomic listing:
Is the organism clearly a single taxonomic entity and can it be adequately distinguished from other entities of the same rank?
Yes
Is the pest defined at the species level or lower?:
Yes
Can listing of the pest at a taxonomic level higher than species be supported by scientific reasons or can species be identified within the taxonomic rank which are the (main) pests of concern?
- Not relevant: Fruits (including hops) sector
If necessary, please list the species:
-
Is it justified that the pest is listed at a taxonomic rank below species level?
Not relevant
Conclusion:
- Candidate: Fruits (including hops) sector
Justification (if necessary):
Remark: Molecular detection methods exist for its detection from infected roots.
2 – Status in the EU:
Is this pest already a quarantine pest for the whole EU?
No
Presence in the EU:
Yes
List of countries (EPPO Global Database):
-
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification (if necessary):
Dematophora necatrix is reported in: Austria, Bulgaria, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Romania (Plantwise Knowledge bank, 2021) and also in the Netherlands (Arnolds et al., 1995), France (Guillaumin et al., 1982), Portugal (Teixeira de Sousa, 1995), Spain (1998), Italy (2016).
HOST PLANT N°1: Malus (1MABG) for the Fruits (including hops) sector.
Origin of the listing:
New proposal
Plants for planting:
Plants intended for planting
3 - Is the pest already listed in a PM4 standard on the concerned host plant?
No
Conclusion:
Evaluation continues
Justification (if necessary):
Not mentioned in PM4/27(1) Malus (1999). Although the first report of Dematophora necatrix causing problems in apple orchards was in the 1980’s in Italy (Pasini et al., 2016) and France (Guillaumin et al., 1982), it was not considered necessary to add this pathogen to PM4/27 in 1999.
4 - Are the listed plants for planting the main* pathway for the "pest/host/intended use" combination? (*: significant compared to others):
Yes
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification:
• Plant: yes (intermediate important)
• Soil: yes (most important)
• Spores: yes (low importance)
The soilborne fungus Rosellinia necatrix is the causal agent of white root rot disease on numerous plant species, including apple. Although the fungus can travel long distances with plant material, plant material is not expected to be the sole source of inoculum. The heterogeneity within the fungus at one location suggests multiple preexisting sources of infection and not movement of infected soil or plant material from a single source (Pasini et al., 2016; Danfy-Yelin et al. 2018). Due to the ability of the fungus to live as a saprophyte, it can survive in soil for long periods on woody debris (Pasini et al., 2016). To avoid infection, one should avoid planting orchards on the sites of former plantations of the main susceptible hosts such as apples, cherries, poplars and tea bushes; limiting irrigation and organic fertilization; and removing stumps and roots as completely as possible, for instance by subsoiling (Plantwise Knowledge Bank, 2021).
In responses to the questionnaire, BE indicated that 'this pathogen is more common in areas with an oceanic climate or a Mediterranean climate, but in the context of climate change, an expansion of its range towards the north is expected'.
In comparison with Armillaria, the Fruit SEWG considered that this pest was more aggressive, making plants for planting being a significant pathway: it frequently attacks and kills very young orchard plants, often during the first year after planting. The fungus is frequent in nurseries, and contamination of orchards from nurseries is probably a common occurrence (CABI, 2021). The use of healthy planting material from nursery plants is crucial to prevent infection: the means to obtain such material include the use of aerated and dry substrates treated with steam or fungicides (EnviroChange, 2012).
The Fruit SEWG commented that good practices in open-ground nursery would be to establish the nursery on virgin soil and rotate, what should allow to produce healthy material.
• Soil: yes (most important)
• Spores: yes (low importance)
The soilborne fungus Rosellinia necatrix is the causal agent of white root rot disease on numerous plant species, including apple. Although the fungus can travel long distances with plant material, plant material is not expected to be the sole source of inoculum. The heterogeneity within the fungus at one location suggests multiple preexisting sources of infection and not movement of infected soil or plant material from a single source (Pasini et al., 2016; Danfy-Yelin et al. 2018). Due to the ability of the fungus to live as a saprophyte, it can survive in soil for long periods on woody debris (Pasini et al., 2016). To avoid infection, one should avoid planting orchards on the sites of former plantations of the main susceptible hosts such as apples, cherries, poplars and tea bushes; limiting irrigation and organic fertilization; and removing stumps and roots as completely as possible, for instance by subsoiling (Plantwise Knowledge Bank, 2021).
In responses to the questionnaire, BE indicated that 'this pathogen is more common in areas with an oceanic climate or a Mediterranean climate, but in the context of climate change, an expansion of its range towards the north is expected'.
In comparison with Armillaria, the Fruit SEWG considered that this pest was more aggressive, making plants for planting being a significant pathway: it frequently attacks and kills very young orchard plants, often during the first year after planting. The fungus is frequent in nurseries, and contamination of orchards from nurseries is probably a common occurrence (CABI, 2021). The use of healthy planting material from nursery plants is crucial to prevent infection: the means to obtain such material include the use of aerated and dry substrates treated with steam or fungicides (EnviroChange, 2012).
The Fruit SEWG commented that good practices in open-ground nursery would be to establish the nursery on virgin soil and rotate, what should allow to produce healthy material.
5 - Economic impact:
Are there documented reports of any economic impact on the host?
Yes
Justification:
Malus is reported to be susceptible to the fungus (Plantwise Knowledge Bank, 2021).
Agarwala and Sharma (1966) estimated losses caused by R. necatrix in apple (Malus sp.) in the state of Himachal Pradesh, India, to be at least $272,000 in 1963 (Conversion based on Officer, 2002). This conservative estimate converts to about $1.6 million dollars present time (Conversion CPI, Williamson, 2002; cited from Ten Hoopen & Krauss, 2006).
In 1997, an Australian study reported that the white root rot was the most soilborne disease of apple in Queensland (Mouton, 2023). The author found that more than half of the orchards were affected, with estimated annual losses of approximately AUD 1 million for the industry.
It is reported as an increasing problem in apple orchards, in particular in Northern Italy (Trentino, Friuli Venezia Giulia) where soil contamination in orchards is revealed by the presence of large spots of weak or dead plants showing important drought-like symptoms (EnviroChange, 2012). The Fruit SEWG noted that when applying good practices, an orchard should not be replanted in the 4-5 years after another orchard: this would greatly limit the risk. A nursery is generally established on virgin soil. However, because of urbanization, this is not always feasible.
Agarwala and Sharma (1966) estimated losses caused by R. necatrix in apple (Malus sp.) in the state of Himachal Pradesh, India, to be at least $272,000 in 1963 (Conversion based on Officer, 2002). This conservative estimate converts to about $1.6 million dollars present time (Conversion CPI, Williamson, 2002; cited from Ten Hoopen & Krauss, 2006).
In 1997, an Australian study reported that the white root rot was the most soilborne disease of apple in Queensland (Mouton, 2023). The author found that more than half of the orchards were affected, with estimated annual losses of approximately AUD 1 million for the industry.
It is reported as an increasing problem in apple orchards, in particular in Northern Italy (Trentino, Friuli Venezia Giulia) where soil contamination in orchards is revealed by the presence of large spots of weak or dead plants showing important drought-like symptoms (EnviroChange, 2012). The Fruit SEWG noted that when applying good practices, an orchard should not be replanted in the 4-5 years after another orchard: this would greatly limit the risk. A nursery is generally established on virgin soil. However, because of urbanization, this is not always feasible.
What is the likely economic impact of the pest irrespective of its infestation source in the absence of phytosanitary measures? (= official measures)
Medium
Is the economic impact due to the presence of the pest on the named host plant for planting, acceptable to the propagation and end user sectors concerned?
No
Is there unacceptable economic impact caused to other hosts (or the same host with a different intended use) produced at the same place of production due to the transfer of the pest from the named host plant for planting?
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification:
Young plant may die from infection (Plantwise Knowledge Bank, 2021), which is considered unacceptable. As good nursery practices should already prevent such infections, the Fruit SEWG questioned whether regulation would provide any real additional benefit.
6 - Are there feasible and effective measures available to prevent the presence of the pest on the plants for planting at an incidence above a certain threshold (including zero) to avoid an unacceptable economic impact as regards the relevant host plants?
Yes
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification:
Inclusion in a certification scheme.
Testing the initial stock, visual examination for other categories.
Use virgin soil when establishing a nursery.
Use of substrates as growth media treated with steam or fungicides.
Use of Trichoderma atroviride as a biocontrol agent against R. necatrix reduced white root rot incidence on apple seedlings only if treatment was applied at least 1 week before planting (Pasini et al., 2016).
Testing the initial stock, visual examination for other categories.
Use virgin soil when establishing a nursery.
Use of substrates as growth media treated with steam or fungicides.
Use of Trichoderma atroviride as a biocontrol agent against R. necatrix reduced white root rot incidence on apple seedlings only if treatment was applied at least 1 week before planting (Pasini et al., 2016).
7- Is the quality of the data sufficient to recommend the pest to be listed as a RNQP?
Yes
Conclusion:
Candidate
Justification:
CONCLUSION ON THE STATUS:
Recommended for listing as an RNQP, based on data.
8 - Tolerance level:
Is there a need to change the Tolerance level:
Yes (new regulation proposal)
Proposed Tolerance levels:
Zero tolerance, based on the following measures
9 - Risk management measures:
Is there a need to change the Risk management measure:
Yes
Proposed Risk management measure:
The following measures were recommended for non-certified material (‘CAC’):
(A) Plants for planting have been produced in a pest free production site
remark: good production practices consisting of rotating nursery fields and using virgin soils should allow such a pest free production site to be established. The pest free production site is based on visual examination and/or testing.
(B) In case of a finding, plants for planting from the production site can only be marketed after delimitation of the infestation based on further visual examination (confirmed by testing in case of doubt) and cultivation practices (e.g. irrigation and organic fertilization). All the plants in the delimited area should be uprooted and destroyed.
Pre-basic, basic and certified material, additional measures to be considered include:
• Use of sterilized soil or soil testing.
(A) Plants for planting have been produced in a pest free production site
remark: good production practices consisting of rotating nursery fields and using virgin soils should allow such a pest free production site to be established. The pest free production site is based on visual examination and/or testing.
(B) In case of a finding, plants for planting from the production site can only be marketed after delimitation of the infestation based on further visual examination (confirmed by testing in case of doubt) and cultivation practices (e.g. irrigation and organic fertilization). All the plants in the delimited area should be uprooted and destroyed.
Pre-basic, basic and certified material, additional measures to be considered include:
• Use of sterilized soil or soil testing.
Justification (if necessary):
The Fruit SEWG did not recommend soil testing. The pest can survive on wood debris. When destroying plants, particular attention should paid not to spread the fungus. The delimited zone should not be re-used for a couple of growing seasons, but no exact timing can be recommended.
REFERENCES:
- Agarwala, R.K., Sharma, V.C., 1966. White root-rot disease of apple in Himachal Pradesh. Indian Phytopathology 29, 82–86.
- Arnolds E, Kuyper TW & Noordeloos ME (1995). Overzicht van de paddestoelen in Nederland. 871 pp. NMV, Wijster. (Fungi)
- Dafny-Yelin M., Mairesse O, Moy J, Dor S & Malkinson D (2018). Genetic diversity and infection sources of Rosellinia necatrix in northern Israel. Phytopathologia Mediterranae 57(1), 37-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-22478
- EnviroChange (2012) Rosellinia necatrix: an increasing problem in apple orchards. www.envirochange.eu.
- Guillaumin JJ, Mercier S & Dubos B (1982). Les pourridiés à Armillariella et Rosellinia en France sur vigne, arbres fruitiers et cultures florales I. Etiologie et symptomatologie. Agronomie 2, 71-80.
- López-Herrera CJ, Pérez-Jiménez RM, Zea-Bonilla T, Basallote-Ureba MJ & Melero-Vara JM (1998). Soil solarization in established avocado trees for control of Dematophora necatrix. Plant Disease 82, 1088-1092.
- Mouton A (2023) White root rot caused by Rosellinia necatrix afflicts everything from apples to avocadoes. HORTGRO internet site. Fresh Quarterly. Consulted on 2024-08-21. Available at https://www.freshquarterly.co.za/rosellinia-necatrix/
- Pasini L, Prodorutti D, Pastorelli S, Pertot I (2016). Genetic diversity and biocontrol of Rosellinia necatrix infecting apple in Northern Italy. Plant Disease 100, 444-452. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-15-0480-RE. Epub 2015 Dec 19. PMID: 30694124.
- Plantwise Knowledge Bank (2021). Rosellinia necatrix (dematophora root rot). (accessed 21/Mar/2024). https://plantwiseplusknowledgebank.org/doi/full/10.1079/pwkb.species.47860
- Teixeira de Sousa AJ, Guillaumin JJ, Sharples GP, Whalley AJS (1995). Rosellinia necatrix and white root rot of fruit trees and other plants in Portugal and nearby regions. Mycologist 9, 31-33.
- Ten Hoopen M & Krauss U (2005). Biology and control of Rosellinia bunodes, Rosellinia necatrix and Rosellinia pepo: A review. Crop Protection 25 (2), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2005.03.009
